You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

15259221? ago

In your link on Sumer.... r they saying that the Akkadians were there before the Sumerians? And if not, then where did the Akkadians come from? They didn’t just appear so that means that they can’t be the first, that they must’ve come from somewhere else, same with Sumer. They claim that the Sumerians had to move inland after the flood. So the Sumerians had a civilization in tact prior to the one that history is recording as the first. How do we know how advanced they were? Hypothetically they could’ve more advanced than we r today?

15259340? ago

You are starting to think clearly.

So why create a false narrative about sumer and the sumerians? What group of people would benefit from the world being trapped into a 12,000 year memory span most of which originates with the story of the first temple? Why credit written language as only being 4,500~ years old? Who benefits from hiding the fact that present humanity is a rebirth of what came before?

15259556? ago

It seems history will tell us that after the flood the only prevalent civilization were Semitic people? So this is probably where most folks would stop looking and will assume that this is the beginning not understanding that we have many millennia more to go back to find the real first civilization?

15260216? ago

Boom.

only prevalent civilization were Semitic people?

Why would they tell their cattle the truth?

15260369? ago

Control. But amazingly all people have to do is look at the facts of which are all open source, ready and waiting for us. It’s right in our faces.

15260390? ago

They don't fear us.