-
Esoteric- "Designed for or understood by the specially initiated alone."
-
Symbol- "An object or act representing something in the unconscious mind that has been repressed."
-
Liminality- "The threshold of disorientation between pre-ritual and post-ritual mind".
The audience to which i am addressing is one of the most unique bodies of people assembled not only in geographical terms it also includes a wide representation of experiences and knowledge. If there is a common theme i believe it to be one of skepticism and curiosity of the unknown and in equally varying degrees a level of self awareness. In this pursuit of truth one must be willing to challenge everything about the world around them and the very core of their being. To let go of ones self is the death of the ego, an understandable challenge. One must undergo this change in order to reach a higher level of reason and one must do this for themselves as It cannot be done for you. It is requisite that you are biologically able to understand these words, and not all of you will be able to.
(Bear with the author as the author bears with those who can't think but can still speak. As a result, a measure of hand holding is included.)
Cognitive dissonance and perceived superiority are the pitfalls of confidence and by virtue we should always be in recognition of the value of the unknown. One must be able to entertain infinite branches of supposition and theory and to be willing to start anew with every additional computation. The recognition that this process is directly limited by the input and availability of information regardless of the base objective reality, It would do us well to recognize that truth is not selfish nor hidden in that it can be found by anyone and at any moment. When it has been found its holders can either preserve or veil, creating a cycle of rediscovery and loss. Many of you are going to be too triggered and hateful inside yourselves to listen to anything or anyone who might challenge the false reality in which you live.
Many of you however wont have the reading comprehension needed or intellect to take the time to understand what i am saying and instead you will leap to strawmans and ad hominem attacks instead discussing the subject matter and corroborating evidence. Doomed as sheep. My character is irrelevant. The sooner you learn to separate people from a point of reason the sooner you can start thinking for yourself. This message is not for those with hardened hearts and stiff necks, those too weak to pull away from the matrix. Jesus preached to those willing to accept the redpill and left seeds for the sheep in hope that in time they too could see.
Knowledge and truth lay outside the frame of human existence and our ability to understand being strongly influenced by the span of humanities collective intellect would therefore demand an honest attempt at accounting for said timeline. Here is that accounting.
(This isn't something you can skim over, everything is included for a reason and it is the responsibility of the reader to comprehend what is delivered and to actually do their part of reading the sources in order.)
2.5~ Million years of hominids with similar or larger cranial capacity.
160,000 years of modern homo sapien, Sumer 4500BC
Here we have a conflict of reasoning between what we are told and what the evidence is telling us.(Read the sources and in the proper order.) The addition of geological and astronomical understanding resolves this conflict.
The last ice age started 2.5 million years ago and ended 12,800~ years ago, covering most of modern hominid history.
The Younger Dryas is the youngest and longest of three stadials, which resulted from typically abrupt climatic changes that took place over the last 16,000 calendar years.[6] Within the Blytt–Sernander classification of north European climatic phases, the prefix "Younger" refers to the recognition that this original "Dryas" period was preceded by a warmer stage, the Allerød oscillation, which, in turn, was preceded by the Older Dryas, around 14,000 calendar years BP. That is not securely dated, and estimates vary by 400 years, but it is generally accepted that it lasted around 200 years. In northern Scotland, the glaciers were thicker and more extensive than during the Younger Dryas.[7] The Older Dryas, in turn, was preceded by another warmer stage, the Bølling oscillation, that separated it from a third and even older stadial, often known as the Oldest Dryas. The Oldest Dryas occurred approximately 1,770 calendar years before the Younger Dryas and lasted about 400 calendar years. According to the GISP2 ice core from Greenland, the Oldest Dryas occurred between about 15,070 and 14,670 calendar years BP.[8]
The world temperature fluctuation were brutal during this period of time, life was easier near the equator. 12,800-10,000~ years ago a great warming period began and gave rose to our current geological epoch the Holocene. Things have never been more stable than the past 10,000 years and we adapted to take advantage of that. (Maternal mitochondrial dna studies are laughable in sample size/selection, anthropological phylogenetic data of cultivated grasses is far better.)
The great flood occurred during the younger Dryas ~12,800 years ago, significantly reducing the coastline of the northern hemisphere. Seven thousand generations of you and i and do you suppose that civilization recently began? So it is from the eyes of humanity that we must be aware of and the limits of continuity, motive and the absolute recognition of hidden or lost history. How would we communicate the discovery of knowledge across such time spans? When a story is told within our collective memory we must separate elements by their addition on the human timeline to elucidate a clear path. What would be worth preservation?
Megalithic sites represent advanced knowledge of astronomical measurements and by virtue mathematics. A deep understanding of the great year (25,800) and axial precession (72:1) which would take considerable time and resource to intelligently observe, clear signs of civilization. With recent sites being dated to 40,000~+ (BC) and the understanding that earth is a changing template with time being its power, one would be forced to conclude that we are a reboot cycle of humanity set within a 12 thousand year memory span rather than the peak of a 12 thousand year linear progression. This memory span has the history of Israel at the center of this false "Official" view point. This is not reflective of objective reality, rather a lens shrouding the available perception through the viewpoint of 12,000 years that you are forced into standing on for lack of awareness of its existence. Which conforms you into a suitable range of possibilities for thought and that makes you far easier to bring to subjugation.
Again, the tribal memory reaches back 12,000 years to the story of the great flood. It is important you actually understand the paragraph above and the implications as outlined previous. This would mean that by virtue, the collective mythos of mindkind and all of its suppositions of cult and religion stem from a limited window (and point of origin) of the totality of human existence. Controlled. Focused. Blinders to a farmhand. Without this recognition you will fail to see what others see so clearly.
Consider the following;
The logarithmic growth of technology is both the means of our liberation and everlasting sinusoidal enslavement. The choice to know has always been yours to take, The holding of knowledge is of great value and in times past knowledge could be removed at the disposal of those who knew. The parable of the garden of Eden/ Matrix/ Christ/ shepards, sheeps and wolves. Truth will be painful. When you know you know it, you are not alone.
Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.- Matthew 9:17 KJV
view the rest of the comments →
15258764? ago
Did you know bringing religion to the table only discredits your idea / post?
15258839? ago
Did you know that the only ones who would interrupt that as a discredit do so from the cognitive dissonance of their own self perceived superiority and that such persons would be incapable of the intellect required for the nuances involved?
Did you know that you missed the entire point of my post and the entire point of religion in general which was also explained?