If he really does believe a nuclear armed state beat a gun armed public, then why would he want to disarm the people from their guns?
Because he knows that communist police states cannot have full control over the population without the boots on the ground, door to door police state thuggery, they can't force communism on the people.
Police states require a disarmed public so that when the police state thugs are dispersed throughout the country, they will be able to shoot the people like sheep on a farm.
Believe me, nukes alone are not enough. Nukes can only control governments, and thus the people only indirectly. For direct control they need a police state force over a disarmed public,
Hitler took the guns.
Stalin took the guns.
Mao took the guns.
Pol Pot took the guns.
Castro took the guns.
These fascist/communist (no difference from the perspective of the individual forced to live under police state tyranny) "gun control" advocates know that they have no power over the people, so they're trying to disarm them under the cover of stopping "mass shooting" that they themselves always seem to be associated with. We see the evidence and the connections. Fake news can't hide it anymore.
oh give it a rest. He removed the guns from the jews, the actual german citizens were allowed even looser gun regulations than they had before, just look at the role of shooting training in the hitler youth
Then, to better clarify the point: Hitler took guns from certain citizens, and then imprisoned, and murdered defenseless people by the millions- just like all of the popular fascist/marxist dick-taters have done throughout history.
The point stands. Never give your vote to a gun-grabber, under any, and all circumstances. No exceptions!!!
a.) he took the guns from citizens who deserved it
b.) he imprisoned citizens who deserved it
c.) the holocaust never happened darling, more's the shame
The point stands. Never give your vote to a gun-grabber, under any, and all circumstances. No exceptions!!!
This bit is highly valid though. Remember, if someone insists they're taking your gun, shoot to kill. You can ask questions when they're bleeding out on the floor.
view the rest of the comments →
15088949? ago
Swallwell is panicking.
If he really does believe a nuclear armed state beat a gun armed public, then why would he want to disarm the people from their guns?
Because he knows that communist police states cannot have full control over the population without the boots on the ground, door to door police state thuggery, they can't force communism on the people.
Police states require a disarmed public so that when the police state thugs are dispersed throughout the country, they will be able to shoot the people like sheep on a farm.
Believe me, nukes alone are not enough. Nukes can only control governments, and thus the people only indirectly. For direct control they need a police state force over a disarmed public,
Hitler took the guns.
Stalin took the guns.
Mao took the guns.
Pol Pot took the guns.
Castro took the guns.
These fascist/communist (no difference from the perspective of the individual forced to live under police state tyranny) "gun control" advocates know that they have no power over the people, so they're trying to disarm them under the cover of stopping "mass shooting" that they themselves always seem to be associated with. We see the evidence and the connections. Fake news can't hide it anymore.
The people are awake.
15089447? ago
oh give it a rest. He removed the guns from the jews, the actual german citizens were allowed even looser gun regulations than they had before, just look at the role of shooting training in the hitler youth
15091158? ago
Then, to better clarify the point: Hitler took guns from certain citizens, and then imprisoned, and murdered defenseless people by the millions- just like all of the popular fascist/marxist dick-taters have done throughout history.
The point stands. Never give your vote to a gun-grabber, under any, and all circumstances. No exceptions!!!
15091894? ago
a.) he took the guns from citizens who deserved it
b.) he imprisoned citizens who deserved it
c.) the holocaust never happened darling, more's the shame
This bit is highly valid though. Remember, if someone insists they're taking your gun, shoot to kill. You can ask questions when they're bleeding out on the floor.