If he really does believe a nuclear armed state beat a gun armed public, then why would he want to disarm the people from their guns?
Because he knows that communist police states cannot have full control over the population without the boots on the ground, door to door police state thuggery, they can't force communism on the people.
Police states require a disarmed public so that when the police state thugs are dispersed throughout the country, they will be able to shoot the people like sheep on a farm.
Believe me, nukes alone are not enough. Nukes can only control governments, and thus the people only indirectly. For direct control they need a police state force over a disarmed public,
Hitler took the guns.
Stalin took the guns.
Mao took the guns.
Pol Pot took the guns.
Castro took the guns.
These fascist/communist (no difference from the perspective of the individual forced to live under police state tyranny) "gun control" advocates know that they have no power over the people, so they're trying to disarm them under the cover of stopping "mass shooting" that they themselves always seem to be associated with. We see the evidence and the connections. Fake news can't hide it anymore.
Hitler didn't take any guns from German citizens. Only the dirty kikes who ruined his country, ruined Russia, ruined Rome, and are trying to ruin every western country in the world. Hitler ARMED his citizens with Volksturmgewhers.
Hitler was a no good Dirty Rothschild. He threw his own people under the Bus, Conspired with other Polish Elites and others on How to make it so Hitler and Germany could justify invading because they had to "protect german ethnics" . Hitler Ordered a HALT when they were on the Edge of Winning the WAR. But that halt gave time for america to step in. All done on purpose. He played his role of the bogeyman.
view the rest of the comments →
15088949? ago
Swallwell is panicking.
If he really does believe a nuclear armed state beat a gun armed public, then why would he want to disarm the people from their guns?
Because he knows that communist police states cannot have full control over the population without the boots on the ground, door to door police state thuggery, they can't force communism on the people.
Police states require a disarmed public so that when the police state thugs are dispersed throughout the country, they will be able to shoot the people like sheep on a farm.
Believe me, nukes alone are not enough. Nukes can only control governments, and thus the people only indirectly. For direct control they need a police state force over a disarmed public,
Hitler took the guns.
Stalin took the guns.
Mao took the guns.
Pol Pot took the guns.
Castro took the guns.
These fascist/communist (no difference from the perspective of the individual forced to live under police state tyranny) "gun control" advocates know that they have no power over the people, so they're trying to disarm them under the cover of stopping "mass shooting" that they themselves always seem to be associated with. We see the evidence and the connections. Fake news can't hide it anymore.
The people are awake.
15089740? ago
Hitler didn't take any guns from German citizens. Only the dirty kikes who ruined his country, ruined Russia, ruined Rome, and are trying to ruin every western country in the world. Hitler ARMED his citizens with Volksturmgewhers.
15090291? ago
Hitler was a no good Dirty Rothschild. He threw his own people under the Bus, Conspired with other Polish Elites and others on How to make it so Hitler and Germany could justify invading because they had to "protect german ethnics" . Hitler Ordered a HALT when they were on the Edge of Winning the WAR. But that halt gave time for america to step in. All done on purpose. He played his role of the bogeyman.
15090787? ago
This sounds like something a Rothschild would want to have you believe.