Please share this with everyone you think has been threatened, falsely accused and or harassed by the Hate Agent, @crensch and his accomplices. @crensch banned me from /v/Pizzagate for no reason. He admitted no legitimate reason on a recent Poalcast. He did it "just to be a dick"... his exact words. These are the people Voat has allowed to become in charge of you. They will continue to try and assert authority over research that is not theirs in order to protect the criminals who are being exposed regularly.
@puttitout is allowing a criminal enterprise to take over Voat. Voat is now officially a place where good research goes to die and the reason is because a few actors have successfully manipulated a great platform into a travesty of freespeech that is no longer open to the public.
I am calling out this criminal behavior and I am insisting that these people cease and desist their behavior. Statistically, these stalker cases only escalate, once they have passed acertain point and this case has passed that point.
There will be no denying his own words in his own voice, which some people already claim to have recognized. As I am already part of a DA Victim Witness program, @crensch and his accomplices have violated a number of laws in my state that are counted as felonies; particular in their attempts to doxx me.
If @crensch calls you a pedophile or makes other egregious false allegations for the purpose of harassment, you should report him and his accomplices to the police immediately. Start with your local PD, then make a report with the federal authorities because it is interstate jurisdiction. With enough legitimate reports from victims, the authorities will take action.
The legal precedent is clear that this is an organized crime racket that is designed to harass other users who post legitimate research that exposes their bosses. There is a serious and legitimate RICO case, here.
@theoldones only posts useful information as a way to make it seem he is a legimate user. @crensch makes fake accusations to seem like a legitimate actor. Neither of these people are being honest, ever. The suspected pedophile (because he requested child porn more than once) works in coordination with @crensch and @crensch's own words in the Poalcast reveal that they use the same exact bogus terms (like "unredacted court documents" which is a misnomer. ANyone with a drivers license can get court documents.) These "coincidences" lead most people listening to believe that they are one and the same person.
@crensch admitted on the poalcast that NOBODY doxxed "to pedophiles" and that is just a harassing way of wording things. His definition was that if it goes out to the public, at large, then a pedophile COULD see the information. This admitted hyperbole is a clue to how he fields all arguments against him.
@srayzie has irl connections to this group of bad actors.
@crensch admitted everything we need to know on a recent Poalcast, where he can't help but stalk me because I have scheduled appearances and he has an obsessive and stalkerish nature. These people are criminals and I have reported them to multiple authorities with more steps being planned to combat their criminal harassment of myself and other users. Please post any additional information that you have, demonstrating their willingness to target and harass sincere users.
Having followed me and harassed me onto other sites, @Crensch has taken to stalking me on Poal and even the Poal Mumble server. This is stalking, and given the attempts to doxx me, as well as the pedophile connotation of his accomplices, this is sufficient in some states to apply for a restraining order where @crensch would have to register as a sex offender. Why these people are willing to request child porn in a public forum is insane, to me, but these are the people who seek to criticize me and make sure I am not allowed to post any research where it might be visible to a large number of people.
Having been appropriately drawn out, @Crensch admitted to some troubling behavior and motivations on the Poal cast, where, in his desperate desire to make everything about him it is made clear his subs should be system subs. He is totally untrustworthy, operates under ulterior motives and, despite never posting any research (admittedly), @crensch's primary aim is to harass legitimate, sincere users. @crensch is a shill who should be banned from Voat permanently. @crensch admitted to this. We do not have to guess. It is a travesty that @puttitout allows him any power of other users.
Without going into too long of a diatribe, let's look at what @crensch admitted to on the Poalcast, where we can all listen to the recording to prove what I am saying is true.
I attempted to enter into an agreement with these drama spammers to never mention them, if they also agreed to not mention me. This was too difficult of a task for these bad actors.
@crensch admitted to making numerous false accusations, including where he called me a pedophile. Though he tried to bury the evidence of this, most people know this to be true and many have screen shotted the evidence. False accusations, particularly of this nature are is a terroristic harassment per the penal code in every state where he can be liable for damages in a variety of ways. @Crensch has falsley accused many people of being a pedophile, like @thebuddha, "just to be a dick." I encourage everyone he has falsely accused to post information about his behavior and report him to the authorities, along with his accomplice accounts, @shizie, @shizy (also made false accusations in a harassing manner), @theoldones (also made harassing false accusations in a systematic and coordinated effort) and, of course@srayzie who criminally harassed @gothamgirl and others, in tandem with these other accounts.
This is officially a criminal matter and it should be treated as such. I am as serious as a heart attack. Site admin should not allow the criminal harassment of users.
@Crensch admitted to doxxing @gothamgirl and @TexasVet, though attempted to redefine what he thought doxxing was. I will spell it out... sharing people's personal information with the specific intent to harass is doxxing and criminal harassment. @Crensch admitted to this behavior, stating that he is doing it "just to be a dick." His exact words. @crensch has admitted to multiple crimes.
@crensch admitted to voat manipulation using pings.
@crensch admitted to having access to IP information on Voat during the poalcast, though he tried to back pedal when he was called out on it.
@crensch admitted to a lot of information that suggests he works closely with @theoldones, assuming that account isn't an alt of his. Both of these accounts have doxxed other users with malicious intent and both are extraordinarily aligned with who they like and do not like. In fact, they are desperate to defend @srayzie, who was sending naked pictures around to all of Voat to gain influence over those with control over larger subs. After I made an agreement with @srayzie not to discuss these topics (because I would rather focus on research and music) @theoldones immediately set out to spend weeks defaming me with knowingly false accusations, nullifying the agreement.
I made another agreement with @crensch, to make a quid pro quo effort to stop the conflict, but @crensch ignored the agreement after I delivered and deleted all of my legitimate criticism of him, @srayzie and @theoldones. Notice that @crensch was very specific in his requests on which posts I deleted... he specifically request all criticism of @srayzie and the @theoldones were deleted. This is proof of a closer connection, showing that possibly @srayzie AND her husband are involved.
Please consider sharing the following information every time @crensch harasses you in order to make it clear that this behavior should not be tolerated by people in admin positions. Please report him to the authorities. If you are interested in joining a class action lawsuit against these people, I will be willing to lead the way because, apparently, that is the only logical way to get justice and recompense from these people. A court order where they pay for the damage they've done and some jail time are the only thing that are going to give them pause. At this stage, they are not going to stop unless something is done.
You may be entitled to seek damages.The legal precedent is clear for knowingly making false accusations:
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/38/1226/2311370/
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/mn-court-of-appeals/1002976.html
https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1592&context=wmlr
Combining these false accusations, the admission that they were knowingly false, the persistent and systemic application of these accusations and screenshots of @crensch's many calls to violence show that this is a criminal enterprise.
Combined with the fact that these people make repeated calls to violence and their lack of desire to post any research means that their goal is harassment of other users. Period. @crensch admittedly serves no purpose on Voat other than to harass users. He was unable to articulate any kind of purpose when confronted about this issue.
If you make a report to law enforcement, I encourage you to include his many calls to violence:
https://imgur.com/a/HXcAl12
@crensch has a pattern of conduct (a series of acts over a long period of time) where a reasonable person would consider his threats to be serious, uses electronic communication devices as a means to follow, harass, monitor, surveil and threaten and interfere with users of Voat. This damages his victims' ability to conduct regular business. He follows me from place to place and follows me without conducting any news gathering conduct.
view the rest of the comments →
kneo24 ago
Uhh, too bad Sean Sweat, aka @TexasVet did that to himself. You could ask @antiliberalsoceity about all of that.
You've been caught being a massive faggot before claiming people on Voat were trying to attack your website with proof that amounted to nothing. Now you're using someones instance of a claim to say, "see they did this", which calls into question your other claims.
Did you read your link for claims of an alt? I did. Nothing seems to substantiate what you're describing. I chose this one randomly, thinking there was something spicy in it.
You very well could have legitimate claims, but I took 5 minutes to easily debunk three of yours. The claims of CP solicitation against @theoldones is easily debunked when you look at context of the conversation. You're taking the side of those who support pedophiles because someone went into an overzealous campaign against them here. You consistently poison your own well.
I'm not even a fan of @Crensch anymore. I'm not even a fan of @theoldones. You just suck at this.
followthemoney ago
Who are you?
Also, people post themselves on Facebook. That is not doxxing with intent to harass. I'm sorry, but you're definition falls short and you fail to address the systematic doxxing of @gothamgirl which seems like you are pro lying an agenda.
Who are you?
kneo24 ago
Way to shift the goal posts. My point is TexasVet doxxed himself. Crensch did none of that. TexasVet did it to himself. Claiming that Crensch doxxed someone who already self doxxed is is beyond dumb.
Why do I need to address every bit of that shit show? I purposely stayed out of it even though I kept getting invited by all parties involved. I don't see you addressing the pedo loving nature of users like Maggotbait88, yet you and your kind love using their twisted explanations to defame @theoldones. It's not hard to make fun of that guy, but for whatever reason you use the worst possible piece you could gather to do so.
Cool, name calling. Earlier in this thread you chastized someone for calling someone names. It's a shame registration is closed on Voat right now. I'd try to convince you to change your name to (((followthemoney))) since you're so fond of using (((their))) tactics.
I'm me. While you sit there trying to figure out who some nobody is, I'll just remind you and everyone else that we're all @kevdude according to @9-11.
Gothamgirl ago
"I kept getting invited by all parties involved."
That's a lie and now everything you just wrote is questionable. I have no idea who you are, and never not once seen your screen name until tonight.
heygeorge ago
It’s a bit of hyperbole, if you put your reading comprehension hat on, love
kneo24 ago
@antiliberalsociety
I messed up your username above.
antiliberalsociety ago
Thanks, I'm glad someone called that out.
Here's a snippet from the megapost:
heygeorge ago
Dude, this is a perfect collection of links. Slimey would do well to learn from you here.
By the by I have no control over that crackhead fella. Although I do with you’d taken my bait about being ‘successful’. That shit was funny.
Crensch ago
I know it's meaningless, but kudos for actually looking into this unlike the rest of the sheep around here.
kneo24 ago
Hey, I might not see eye to eye with you on your new found campaign here after the whole srayzie drama, but that won't stop me from at least being fair when I do take the time to look at these claims.
He could be right, you could be a giant massive faggot, but it's hard to take them seriously when they don't support 90% of the claims they're making. It's baffle them with bullshit style.
followthemoney ago
@Vindicator exact quote. Interesting.
kneo24 ago
What do you even mean here?
Vindicator ago
When shills post long, complicated "research" to v/pizzagate with a million links to waste moderator and researcher time (a fancy form of forum sliding), I call it "Baffle with Bullshit".
antiliberalsociety ago
That saying has been around for decades.
"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit"
heygeorge ago
I also use the common expression ‘baffle with bullshit’, I guess we’re all the same person now. @kneo24
Also, are you picking up in this thread that @followthemoney is pretending to be a distinct individual from slimey? Peculiar.
Vindicator ago
He has numerous alts for his shenanigans.