You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

followthemoney ago

Only after she is mad about her criminal history showing up. Nothing was being done before that.

sguevar ago

Well at this point I am glad to see that it happened and that u/Crensch's doxx team has been taken down and with that @Puttitout showed Voat as well that what u/Crensch did was in the wrong.

I am happy that justice was served where it needed to be served, equally.

Crensch ago

as well that what u/Crensch did was in the wrong.

And somehow, I'm still here.

Which means I didn't do anything wrong.

Kek.

sguevar ago

Mmm. So by that logic u/WhiteRonin either. Am I correct?

Crensch ago

Kek. Not at all. Dude posted dox info all over the place. Kev's the one that leaked it all.

But please, keep equating me to them. I'm sure it helps you feel better about all the dishonesty you've shown in the past month and a half.

sguevar ago

Kev's the one that leaked it all

This is an assumption you are throwing out there but without real proof of it. And it is one you are hanging with because of the fact that it convenes your constant search for attacking v/ProtectVoat which failed quite poorly to say the least.

But please, keep equating me to them.

I don't equate you to them, they didn't organized a doxx party like you did with alts. Nor tried to defend any doxx attempt at all. I mean u/WhiteRonin spread multiple links to something that I made sure to report myself from which other users got banned for what they did in the anon sub. But he never defended doxxing anyone.

Neither u/kevdude.

The only one on record that I have seen defending doxxing attempts on Voat was you u/Crensch on this post of yours: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3274898.

But please, keep equating me to them. I'm sure it helps you feel better about all the dishonesty you've shown in the past month and a half.

Sure I have been the dishonest one, that is why your attacks against have failed so badly... I was the dishonest one. I was the one betraying my principles and beliefs to attack my counter parts. I was the one defending doxxers all along... You can keep diverting my dear typhoon but you are nothing more than a whistle now...

Crensch ago

The only one on record that I have seen defending doxxing attempts on Voat was you u/Crensch on this post of yours: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3274898.

Was I defending doxxing attempts, or was I showing how dishonest you were labeling it "possible misinfo"?

Oh, right. It was the latter. And you were very obviously in the wrong there. You had no way of knowing that, you just plastered the flair up, and told him you'd continue to do so on any of his posts.

You're so dishonest it's hilarious.

Sure I have been the dishonest one, that is why your attacks against me* have failed so badly...

Not one of my attacks has failed, but keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better.

I was the dishonest one. I was the one betraying my principles and beliefs to attack my counter parts.

Yes, and you don't seem to have many principles, since lying and being dishonest seem to be part of your modus operandi.

I was the one defending doxxers all along... You can keep diverting my dear typhoon but you are nothing more than a whistle now...

You're defending kevdude despite him being the only one that could have dropped the video linking srayzie's pic to her name. Those are private links, sguevar. How did gothamgirl/zyklon get them?

sguevar ago

Was I defending doxxing attempts, or was I showing how dishonest you were labeling it "possible misinfo"?

Well on another comment I read you made you stated "this guy got you by the balls and you are scared" (paraphrasing) when you were addressing u/zyklon_b so you sure profited from that user's attempts.

Also you can claim that you were trying to show how dishonest I was being by the flair I put on the post however I did what was needed to defend a user from a doxx you felt quite passionately about. I do not regret my actions and I stand by them and all of Voat saw that hence your failure there.

Oh, right. It was the latter. And you were very obviously in the wrong there. You had no way of knowing that, you just plastered the flair up, and told him you'd continue to do so on any of his posts.

I flaired it and made the necessary inquiries through the same post. Again I do not regret it and even after your post I stickied it so everyone could see what you were encouraging there.

You're so dishonest it's hilarious.

You making a character judgement is even more funny but by all means keep it up.

Not one of my attacks has failed, but keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better.

Well right back at you. You saw a win where there wasn't one to be honest with you. But as I said to you before: convenience is a dangerous drug.

Yes, and you don't seem to have many principles, since lying and being dishonest seem to be part of your modus operandi.

Well that since I stand by my words and my post history and comment history show my consistency you can keep repeating it all you want. Doesn't make it true.

You're defending kevdude despite him being the only one that could have dropped the video linking srayzie's pic to her name. Those are private links, sguevar. How did gothamgirl/zyklon get them?

To be honest with you I never watch them. Wasn't interested at all. And to my knowledge from what I understand the first person that got any of those vids/pics was Esoteric. So isn't that a reasonable doubt that can be consider? Or your pride doesn't let you see objectively? (I don't even know why I am asking... after all I know the answer to the last one)

Crensch ago

I did what was needed to defend a user from a doxx you felt quite passionately about.

So you lied. Got it.

You didn't defend anyone from anything.

The user claimed he used only public searches to find what he did about them, which is EXACTLY the excuse Trigglypuff and Rotteuxx used for srayzie. You had no way of knowing if it was a lie, yet you flaired it as misinformation. Not "Dox" Not "warning" nothing. Misinformation.

A lie.

And btw, I saw you floundering around not able to find the info he did, but I tried it myself later, and found far more than what he dropped. All public searches. But go ahead and call me a liar or untruthful after your constant lying and dishonesty here.

sguevar ago

So you lied. Got it.

Your perception. I don't care much about it.

You didn't defend anyone from anything.

That is your insight and you are entitled to have it.

The user claimed he used only public searches to find what he did about them, which is EXACTLY the excuse Trigglypuff and Rotteuxx used for srayzie. You had no way of knowing if it was a lie, yet you flaired it as misinformation. Not "Dox" Not "warning" nothing. Misinformation.

Of information that was never linked before here on Voat. So no u/Trigglypuff nor Rotteuxx acted in the same way because u/srayzie had her persona twitter linked. What you are doing there is a false equivalency.

A lie.

Your characterization of my actions are not of my interest so keep going.

And btw, I saw you floundering around not able to find the info he did, but I tried it myself later, and found far more than what he dropped. All public searches. But go ahead and call me a liar or untruthful after your constant lying and dishonesty here.

I haven't called you a liar. I think you did organized those alts. Obviously not used by you. But that is my opinion on the matter. I have no interest in labeling anything else on you than you betrayed your principles and fell into convenience to wage your "war"... That is it.

Crensch ago

Your perception. I don't care much about it.

You admitted it. It's not a perception, it's a fact.

Of information that was never linked before here on Voat.

Horseshit. I took what zyklon and GG doxxed of themselves and found more than what he did.

So no u/Trigglypuff nor u/Rotteuxx acted in the same way because u/srayzie had her persona twitter linked. What you are doing there is a false equivalency.

She had much of it deleted. It was there no longer. Meaning a "public search" was a lie, but that's the excuse they used.

Your characterization of my actions are not of my interest so keep going.

The truth ought to interest you.

I haven't called you a liar. I think you did organized those alts. Obviously not used by you. But that is my opinion on the matter. I have no interest in labeling anything else on you than you betrayed your principles and fell into convenience to wage your "war"... That is it.

You've shown yourself to have no principles. You lie, admit it, then pretend my pointing out that you lied is some kind of lie because you don't like me.

You're dishonest in the highest degree.

Rotteuxx ago

She had much of it deleted. It was there no longer. Meaning a "public search" was a lie, but that's the excuse they used.

Pure bullshit, it's still on google.

Multiple social media accounts with the same name and various profiles pics. Nothing gets erased from the internet.

Why are you being so fallacious in your argumentation ?

You're dishonest in the highest degree.

Right, maximum projection !

Crensch ago

Pure bullshit, it's still on google.

Then it was a public search? Great. So was what SOOB posted. It still is.

Multiple social media accounts with the same name and various profiles pics. Nothing gets erased from the internet.

So posting all of their stuff is fine? That's kinda what SOOB was getting at...

Why are you being so fallacious in your argumentation ?

I'm not. You just hung yourself.

Right, maximum projection !

Get wrecked.

Rotteuxx ago

Who's soob and what did they post ?

I'm not.

She had much of it deleted. It was there no longer. Meaning a "public search" was a lie, but that's the excuse they used.

Fallacious statement right there.

Proof 1 2 3 4

You just hung yourself.

How ?

Crensch ago

Did you get her images from those public searches?

Rotteuxx ago

Reply to the other points I raised and we'll move on to your new query after that.

Crensch ago

I replied to the other question with an answer. Your turn.

Rotteuxx ago

Nope, if you think you can control a conversation so your narrative stays intact I've got news for you.

Who's soob and what did they post ?

How did I hang myself ?

Converse with integrity or fuck off.

Crensch ago

And this:

Pure bullshit, it's still on google.

Multiple social media accounts with the same name and various profiles pics. Nothing gets erased from the internet.

Why are you being so fallacious in your argumentation ?

Crensch ago

Nope, if you think you can control a conversation so your narrative stays intact I've got news for you.

Then why post this:

        The dumb bitch [@Srayzie](https://voat.co/u/Srayzie) uploaded multiple pictures of herself to various social media networks.

        They are publicly available on google if you search for "@srayzie"

        This is not a dox, you're a fucking moron for believing it is.

?

Rotteuxx ago

Moving the goal post and avoiding answering my questions to hold on to your narrative.

Fuck off, good night.

Crensch ago

Answer that one question and I'll answer everything for you.

I already answered another question elsewhere.

Rotteuxx ago

Nope, you don't have control.

Deal with it.

wokeasfook ago

Wtf. Conversation goes back and forth. As a bystander reading I'd like an answer too.

Rotteuxx ago

Not until i get mine.

Crensch ago

Kek. I really do. Why mention that if you didn't do exactly that to get the pics?

Someone looking at this would have to ask themselves that question.

Rotteuxx ago

No you dont.

Proof right here, keep on fishing.

Crensch ago

I really do have all I need, and it's too bad you're not smart enough to put it all together yourself. Might as well just answer the question, it's pretty much 100% confirmed as is.

Rotteuxx ago

Keep on yappin' !