Assuming that you guys want this drama to end. @GothamGirl should just file a restraining order against @srayz. It's really easy to do, use a fee waiver. As an additional request, the order should request that @srayzie no longer be able to use the Internet or, at least, not be able to use Voat. This is will within the court's ability and it is a no brainer. YOu can't lose this case because this is a case of ongoing criminal harassment.
@srayz has plenty of criminal history and has been arrested with things like trespassing, drug charges and, most recently, a DUI that she failed to stop paying for and has gone into collections.
With the filing of this restraining order, you can issue a subpoena requesting the alts used by @srayz to get to the bottom of what is really going on with her harassment. If you guys are serious about dealing with this problem, I will even fill out the forms and the subpoenas for you.
At this stage, @srayz is making a very poor decision to continue harassment since the extent of her real world criminal history, publicly available information, might start hitting the Internet. I don't really feel like seeing this drama, anymore. @srayz is a problem. @srayz needs to go away. There are plenty of legal ways to make this happen, as well as an opportunity for people involved to demonstrate sincerity in finding an end to the conflict.
You are an accomplice and your double standard proves it. The right subpoena in a restraining order case could unmask you and all of your alt accounts.
I find your team's behavior to fit the legal definition of harassment giving legitimate rise to a case for a restraining order and very likely qualifying for the special request of limiting the Internet access of those participating in the harassment.
Given that your team just threatened @kevdude with a lawsuit and the proven criminal history of those on your team, I don't think you would stand a chance in court. In fact, I consider a case against all of you to be a "slam dunk" by the right parties.
If it did go to court, I would find it in the interest of justice to chime in with what private investigator and forensic accountant software can provide on your team.
That, of course, would include publicly available information, as well.
I'm assuming that's what you want. More conflict? But you play like little babies. I do man's work. It looks like your team wants to see how the two stack up against each other.
You are clearly afraid you will lose the sub /v/GreatAwakening, which is why you had to bring @srayzie back after the threat of it becoming a system sub emerged. Why are you terrified of GA becoming a system sub? Wouldn't that be less work for you?
Also, when it comes to restraining orders, I have a 100% win rate. It is basically unheard of. In California, I have also won permanent restraining orders which are somewhat of a hen's tooth. The few police departments I've served them on have been shocked to see that they are even real.
As for what I do? I have also put pedophiles in jail. So, you can pretend I am not a serious person, but, I do know the court system. My legal advice is on point. I especially know the court system in California.
I think a couple of people can file to end @srayzie's use of Internet with a civil harassment suit, since it meets all of the criteria and is, most importantly, ongoing. I also am certain the criteria is met for the discovery process to include subpoenas in your specific direction, as well. Why? Becaus @srayzie was finally able to start paying on that DUI when you two became involved and you are part of the harassment, using DARVO (aka crybullying) to decry behavior that your friends are also engaged in.
Notice your argument against me contains no substance at all. It is an indicator of guilt.
AD HOMINEM. It means you just lost this argument. You admitted defeat,. just like last time we had a discourse, because all you offer are insults.
Notice you have no intellectual ability to defend your actions because you are in the wrong.
Now, @srayzie has her criminal history posted online everywhere. Everyone should see it, as it is public information. This is not the type of person who would actually be in charge of any type of conservative movement. @srayzie is a shill.
view the rest of the comments →
thewebofslime ago
@kevdude @gothamgirl @srayz @vindicator @crensch
Assuming that you guys want this drama to end. @GothamGirl should just file a restraining order against @srayz. It's really easy to do, use a fee waiver. As an additional request, the order should request that @srayzie no longer be able to use the Internet or, at least, not be able to use Voat. This is will within the court's ability and it is a no brainer. YOu can't lose this case because this is a case of ongoing criminal harassment.
@srayz has plenty of criminal history and has been arrested with things like trespassing, drug charges and, most recently, a DUI that she failed to stop paying for and has gone into collections.
With the filing of this restraining order, you can issue a subpoena requesting the alts used by @srayz to get to the bottom of what is really going on with her harassment. If you guys are serious about dealing with this problem, I will even fill out the forms and the subpoenas for you.
At this stage, @srayz is making a very poor decision to continue harassment since the extent of her real world criminal history, publicly available information, might start hitting the Internet. I don't really feel like seeing this drama, anymore. @srayz is a problem. @srayz needs to go away. There are plenty of legal ways to make this happen, as well as an opportunity for people involved to demonstrate sincerity in finding an end to the conflict.
Crensch ago
https://voat.co/v/whatever/3234217
Remember when it was her husband that doxxed her?
thewebofslime ago
You are an accomplice and your double standard proves it. The right subpoena in a restraining order case could unmask you and all of your alt accounts.
I find your team's behavior to fit the legal definition of harassment giving legitimate rise to a case for a restraining order and very likely qualifying for the special request of limiting the Internet access of those participating in the harassment.
Given that your team just threatened @kevdude with a lawsuit and the proven criminal history of those on your team, I don't think you would stand a chance in court. In fact, I consider a case against all of you to be a "slam dunk" by the right parties.
If it did go to court, I would find it in the interest of justice to chime in with what private investigator and forensic accountant software can provide on your team.
That, of course, would include publicly available information, as well.
https://i.imgur.com/xuteJgs.jpg
I'm assuming that's what you want. More conflict? But you play like little babies. I do man's work. It looks like your team wants to see how the two stack up against each other.
Crensch ago
You don't do shit. Nobody is afraid of you, or your weak fake legal expertise.
thewebofslime ago
You are clearly afraid you will lose the sub /v/GreatAwakening, which is why you had to bring @srayzie back after the threat of it becoming a system sub emerged. Why are you terrified of GA becoming a system sub? Wouldn't that be less work for you?
Also, when it comes to restraining orders, I have a 100% win rate. It is basically unheard of. In California, I have also won permanent restraining orders which are somewhat of a hen's tooth. The few police departments I've served them on have been shocked to see that they are even real.
As for what I do? I have also put pedophiles in jail. So, you can pretend I am not a serious person, but, I do know the court system. My legal advice is on point. I especially know the court system in California.
I think a couple of people can file to end @srayzie's use of Internet with a civil harassment suit, since it meets all of the criteria and is, most importantly, ongoing. I also am certain the criteria is met for the discovery process to include subpoenas in your specific direction, as well. Why? Becaus @srayzie was finally able to start paying on that DUI when you two became involved and you are part of the harassment, using DARVO (aka crybullying) to decry behavior that your friends are also engaged in.
Notice your argument against me contains no substance at all. It is an indicator of guilt.
AD HOMINEM. It means you just lost this argument. You admitted defeat,. just like last time we had a discourse, because all you offer are insults.
Notice you have no intellectual ability to defend your actions because you are in the wrong.
http://www.fresno.courts.ca.gov/civil/civil_harassment.php
You are participating in illegal behavior with @srayzie.
@puttitout
Now, @srayzie has her criminal history posted online everywhere. Everyone should see it, as it is public information. This is not the type of person who would actually be in charge of any type of conservative movement. @srayzie is a shill.
Crensch ago
I bet you're also a Navy SEAL, aren't you?