So yesterday, after witnessing several days of truly despicable smear campaigning by multiple users attempting to paint srayzie as a manipulative floozy using completely unsubstantiated claims who deserved to be driven off Voat, treating her recent fight with @Zyklon_b and friends as if it occurred in a vacuum, I had a conversation in which I reminded @Kevdude about the role that he played in creating it, starting around 1:42 am Voat time.

He was telling @Dismember, former PV mod Disappointed, about why srayzie came under attack by Hojuruku a year ago, and he said,

"I was helping with that. He was attacking the entire mod team in PG and spamming autism to PV and other places."

So I challenged him, because he did not, in fact, "help" with that. He caused it.

First, I gave him a chance to stop misrepresenting the incident. Kev's response was to dismiss Hojuruku's attacks -- which involved a bounty put out on me to try to have me doxxed -- as "because he was crazy". Then he turned it into a completely unwarranted attack on me with a slur against my reputation:

"Look you have this misguided idea that because something annoys you you have the right to delete it. Remember you only left reddit when they threw you off. Silencing entire communities starts with a comment deletion years prior."

I challenged the smear:

Look you have this misguided idea that because something annoys you you have the right to delete it.

Oh? Show me evidence that I delete what annoys me. Show me one single example.

Remember you only left reddit when they threw you off.

I was on Reddit for about three weeks before the migration because I saw the research being posted on Twitter. You've made this "Reddit" accusation against me before. Why do you keep repeating something you know is not true?

Silencing entire communities starts with a comment deletion years prior.

I'd like to see proof of this. I'd also like to know what this has to do with me.

Kev did not -- and cannot -- provide anything to support these assertions.

I went on to address his role in loosing Hojuruku to rampage at will, which I believe is important background information for what ultimately led srayzie to her later acts of desperation and protest:

Besides, I think he was dealt with quite effectively in the end.

Zero thanks to you.

The reason Hojuruku went on a rampage -- after he was legitimately banned after multiple rule breaking posts -- is because you unilaterally unbanned him without doing any research whatsoever into who he was, or what he had been up to. And I didn't reban him, because he was going all over Voat saying I was a pedo and it would have looked like censorship, as I told you at the time when I asked you to fix what you had fucked up. But you didn't care about taking responsibility for your bad decision, or about protecting my reputation. @Crensch rebanned him. That took about two weeks, during which time, srayzie and @think- tried to defend me against him because Hojuruku put a bounty out to have me doxed on multiple platforms. I can document every single word of this, if you like.

Srayzie never would have even gotten on Hojuruku's radar if it weren't for your irresponsible act, followed by your cowardly inaction. The fact that you are allowing a bunch of liars to go around carping about how she "doxed" a guy that doxed himself in every submission he ever made without revealing the MAJOR role you played in creating the situation is very, very telling.

Instead of doing the right thing and owning up to the fact that he let a dangerous, rule-violating nutbar loose to rampage at will, attacking me, then srayzie when she defended me, and then refused to put him back in his cage, he dismissed everything I said as "bullshit":

"That is so much one sided bullshit I don't even know where to start. You're that fucking desperate to paint me as the villain in all of this. Seriously. I'll get back to you in a few days. Or I won't. Whatever."

That was at 7:21 am Voat time. For the next hour, he and I went back and forth, with him deflecting, acting as if I had not been speaking clearly, and diverting away from his creation of the problem. At 8:23 am, I ended the conversation with a restatement of what I had been saying all along:

What was that role, exactly?

Your role -- exactly -- was to create the situation, and then do nothing to fix your mistake or the harm it caused. Srayzie never would have been targeted by Hojuruku if you hadn't unbanned him. Or if you had promptly rebanned him when he did exactly what I warned you he would do.

After that, I went to bed. This morning, I got up to find this gem in my notifications, in which someone created a fake "Vindicator" account on Paol and commented on this post exposing a srayzie alt and claiming "Vindicator must be the biggest weenie on the Internet. Takes to Poal to defend @srayzie's honor".

I have never been on Paol, until today to research this smear, and it's easily proven. Here is how it went down:

Timeline of a Retard Psyop:

• 6/3/2019 between 6:22 am and 8:23 am Voat time I have the above conversation with Kev
• 6/3/2019 at 1:20 am PDT (8:20 am Voat time) at the end of the conversation with Kev the “Vindicator” account is created on Paol

Four hours later…

• 6/3/2019 at 4:52 am PDT (11:52 am Voat time) SrayzieL1ve5 posts the Paol submission
• 6/3/2019 at 4:53 am PDT Just one minute after it was submitted, Paol “Vindicator” account comments
• 6/3/2019 at 2:04 pm Voat time someone seeking to discredit me posts on AnonWhatever claiming I created a Paol account to cover for srayzie _{(Voat time = PDT +7)}

Pretty retarded. How astronomically small are the odds I would be able to find that submission and reply to it within one minute of it being posted, as the hit job posted here on AnonWhatever asserts?

That choice nugget of fecal matter also includes the disinfo narrative of the week portraying srayzie as a magical vixen, the mere sight of whose nude form allegedly enslaved me, @Crensch and apparently everyone but the mighty Kevdude, driving men to never before seen heights of craven Redditry:

[–] 18984156? 0 points (+0|-0) 4.7 hours ago

Promise of sexual favors. Promise of meeting. Promise of seeing more pictures. Like any good cam girl she strung them all out. My theory: if any of the male voaters she’s was sexting where even mildly attractive she would of meet them in person. Unfortunately for her the voat demographic is chubby and over 50. She went after the bottom dwellers of voat. There are attractive people on voat but they’re not spending countless hours on protect voat, great awakening or Pizzagate.

And the final piece de resistance:

At 7:07 pm, Kev cites the sloppily created fake Paol account in attempt to de-legitimize Crensch and his acts of civil disobedience:

"You have literally become Darth Vader. You sold out everything you stood for and now you're a big menacing dude who's going to rip everything apart but somebody's pulling your strings. I can't even take you seriously anymore. I think Vindicator needs your help over on Poal."

You'll note he fails to ping me to his slur. Or this one.

That, my friends, is what happens when you attempt to hold Kevdude accountable for his conduct. That is the "free speech" that is being protected by "ProtectVoat". Speech used to attempt to discredit and thus silence my inconvenient point of view.