This comment was linked from this v/whatever comment by @Renatus.

^{Posted automatically (#15470) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

This submission was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @kevdude.

^{Posted automatically (#221) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

I don't understand your first sentence.

kevdude's endeavours on the matter are outlined here:

https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2919805

This submission was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @kevdude.

^{Posted automatically (#14371) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

Comments are being censored on the pretext of rule-breaking. Rules are not being broken. Consider the following case.

In the context of a conversation of pertinence to monsters in the Bible, a user proposed the Jews.

• That's not against the rules.
• It's not spam.
• It's not racist.
• It's not hate speech.

It's an objective, contextual and valid statement of fact.