I just spent a few days dissecting his utterly irrational form of argument in a comment thread. I did it originally as a form of trolling/entertainment. Initially i had assumed he was just a troll or an insanely paranoid person. But upon further discussion with him i have come to believe strongly that he is a shill attempting to disrupt the community by sowing distrust and strife among those of us here. If you are bored, like REALLY BORED, take a look at his and my comments in this thread. WARNING. this is a multi-day comment thread. i do not bore easily and i hate irrational cunts and shills a lot. https://voat.co/v/politics/1884872/9259040/10#9259040
The thread started because Tallest_Skil decided to adamantly claim that someone was a shill, someone who seemed to make a fair point. I replied that i didnt think making a fair point was proof someone was a shill. The resulting tirade against me from Tallest_Skil is what made me start to question the legitimacy of the account.
If you are bored, or want a nice breakdown of some really manipulative argument methods, take a look at the thread. I truly believe he is a shill here to cause strife. He could also easily just be a completely paranoid retard. But his "Misinterpret and Respond to the Misinterpretation" technique, as i have come to know it, where he removes all meaningful arguments and points from your statement with his misinterpretation and then responds to his own misinterpreted statement instead of yours is EXTREMELY MANIPULATIVE and strikes me very very much as something a shill would use to attempt to deflect from the truth without addressing it.
My only reason for posting this is to attempt to mitigate the damage that he might cause running around accusing people of being shills. That and to mitigate the amount of time that any other person might waste attempting to understand WTF is wrong with this retard. Would love to hear any other opinions or experiences with this fuck nut. Maybe im totally off base, but if he isnt a shill, he is totally fucking insane. that much i am 100% certain of. lol.
EDIT* here is a comment farther down in the thread, in this comment and especially immediately after it (in 3 comments all replied to a single comment of his) i actually start to break down the methods he is using in his responses to ignore any points made by anyone without actually having to legitimately address those points.
https://voat.co/v/politics/1884872/9361420/10#9361420
EDIT #2
Fucking redundant title. I guess ive stayed up a little too late playing cat and mouse with this shill cunt. Must be getting tired.
EDIT #3
I started using his "Misinterpret and Respond" technique about half way through because its the only fucking way to get a word in with the cunt because it is a manipulative method of argument that forces your point while ignoring theirs and the only way to make progress against someone using it is to use it against them. But unlike him i constantly make real points while using his nonsensical technique instead of just spouting off nonsense. So its an adaptation of his methods that can only be used when you arent a disruptive shill that is deliberately trying to avoid the truth or rational arguments in any way. But yeah, wanted to explain why you will see me doing that god awful misinterpret and respond shit. i fucking hate it. But hes difficult to make headway against otherwise.
TLDR; @Tallest_Skil is a manipulative cunt who argues in the most despicable and irrational of ways. I believe he is a shill attempting to sow discord among the users of voat.
view the rest of the comments →
Tallest_Skil ago
I realize that it’s impossible for you–a person who has sold his ideological presence to the highest bidder–to comprehend the concept of morality and a higher calling, but for those you’re trying to infect with this bullshit (thanks for linking all the proof needed to out you as a shill, by the way), I’d like to call out your initial response, yet again, and question why you even replied to the faggot who thinks that morals don’t exist if you hadn’t yourself sold your children (or equivalent) down the river in the past. It wouldn’t matter to you unless you are A. that user on another account or B. a paid shill.
By calling people to hold truth above all else and to not be cowed by threats against you for saying truth. Right, because that’s what shills do, isn’t it?
Irony.
It’s called a strawman, dipshit. You’re well acquainted with all the forms of logical fallacy. You can’t hide it behind faux ignorance at this point.
I’d put that at a 5 by 5.
You mean like you did when I asked why you’d even defend the faggot who thinks that morals don’t exist? Again, either you sold your children (or equivalent) down the river in the past, are that user on another account or are a paid shill. It’s not that simple to comprehend. And yet you refuse to answer the question. Hmm.
You’re a shill. I drew you out to show everyone that you’re a shill. You got no words in. Well, no words for which you weren’t PAID, at least. That much is blatantly obvious. You’re a fucking nutcase.
Translation: WAAAAAA MOMMY THE GUY WHO HAS ACTUALLY READ THE COINTELPRO PLAYBOOK FOUND ME OUUUUUUUT! NOT FAIR!
Fun fact, dipshit. Projecting what you’re doing onto others only works when we don’t know that it’s how you operate. And the best part? Telling you this isn’t actually helping you be a better shill, because you will NEVER IMPROVE FROM THIS FORMULA.
Reported for fucking libel.
markrod420 ago
Oh look. I put your shill tactics on blast and actually got you to say something. Looks like i finally found a way to force you to say something. Lol. Its too late. Nothing could ever convince me you are anything other than a shill piece of shit at this point. Also who are you reporting this to? What magical council of internet enforcement do you think gives a fuck about anything you have to say?
Tallest_Skil ago
Yeah, you're totally not a shill. You don't do anything that shills do. Oh yeah. That's definitely the case.