None of those fit the definition.
You've been told, if you want the definition to change, that is up to the community.
Threatening the mods in a effort to get your way, will not work.
Discuss it with the community, if they agree we would do something, if they don't care, then no amount of harrasment by you will change anything.
view the rest of the comments →
AOU ago
Mods of /v/videos said:
Let the community decide, but let's ban those who go against our thoughts.
Example of spam in v/videos in the past hours:
https://voat.co/v/videos/1396004 (obvious spambot tagged as news/politic by mods. lol)
https://voat.co/v/videos/1395987 (seems like the community didn't like his spam)
https://voat.co/v/videos/1396086 (obvious youtube channel spam for revenues tagged as OC by mods. lol)
https://voat.co/v/videos/1396108 (yet another spammer that is under protection of the mods)
https://voat.co/v/videos/1396500 (and another one)
https://voat.co/v/videos/1395374 (and another VIP one)
https://voat.co/v/videos/1395269 (and again the VIP one)
https://voat.co/v/videos/1395278 (and a new one)
Edit: And 3 more.
https://voat.co/v/videos/1397029
https://voat.co/v/videos/1397008
https://voat.co/v/videos/1396405
There are much more, and you can see it for yourself.
InnocentBystander ago
None of those fit the definition.
You've been told, if you want the definition to change, that is up to the community.
Threatening the mods in a effort to get your way, will not work.
Discuss it with the community, if they agree we would do something, if they don't care, then no amount of harrasment by you will change anything.