38 Thirty. Fucking. Eight. (ProtectVoat)

submitted ago by Crensch

https://i.sli.mg/pQ87gI.png

All from Eugenenix/Antiracist1-80/JesusofNazareth1-77

RANT:

Every single one is of a raving lunatic who cannot, at any resolution, no matter how small, admit he's wrong. There is no discussion here - this website is his soapbox, and anyone engaging him is targeted by his harassment.

I told him I was done responding to him pending either the desire to do so, or some admission on his part that he was wrong - even for something small like trying to use a biologist's opinions to debunk a physicist's book. No dice.

The fact that I'd have to "ignore" more than a hundred usernames just because of this one person is insane. These accounts, with many thousands of downvoats between them, should not be able to post as much as they are able, and they certainly should not be allowed to be accessed or created as easily as it seems they are.

This really becomes an issue when the admins seem to think that fettering our ability to self-regulate with downvoats is more important than username switching to harass legitimate users.

My inbox is flooded with SPAM freakouts of his, and any response to him winds up just becoming another place for him to spew his message. To find legitimate posts, I have to go through many pages of him asserting that his logic holds to things that do not exist in this universe, and in places where the laws of physics break down.

There is nothing I can do to mute this guy. He changes usernames thirty or more times per day. There's a new username every day.

SUGGESTIONS:

Usernames with under 100ccp should not get to ping people.

They should NOT be able to post bullshit right away, get downvoated, and not get muted.

They should be held to some kind of minimum behavioural standard before having the ability to post TEN TIMES in response to the same person without a response FROM that person. Preferably not more than ONCE; not to a post, not to a comment.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

piratse ago

/u/crensch ..... I just want to join in the fun.

Crensch ago

Gotta use the @ sign to ping. /u/ is just a link to their profile.

piratse ago

Shit..... you win this round @crensch.....

ExpertShitposter ago

How do you thinks @Crensch feels knowing he will burn in hell for his lack of faith?

For real tho @Crensch. What's going on here? Amalek harassing you over atheism and jews? Pls post best messages, i need e-drama.

Crensch ago

I'm not convinced antiracist is Amalek. Antiracist seems to think that philosophers can tell physicists what is and isn't true about reality, that biologists can refute physicists, that his DNA is special because of Jesus... or something, and that some preformulated logic works despite the premises not adhering to reality.

https://www.voat.co/v/SJWHate/1365679

Down at the bottom where SarMegahhwhatever deleted a comment. Antiracist brought him up at some point, and the guy thought he could argue that his religion wasn't a delusion.

Not sure it'll be entertaining, but you're more than welcome to trawl through that.

fuckccf ago

or something, and that some preformulated logic works despite the premises not adhering to reality.

You are UTTERLY INCAPABLE of explaining why any premises don't adhere to reality. You mistakenly claimed question-begging. You mistakenly claimed special pleading. You mistakenly claimed you can dismiss logic because of "before time." Now you're desperately clinging to authority. "But MUH CARROLL is an atheist, therefore atheism is true!" While ignoring George Ellis. You just keep insisting that physicists are the only ones who study reality, not philosophers. Biologists study biology, and can tell physicists about biology. Topics like "necessity" and "truth" and "the prime mover argument" are studied by expert philosophers who specialize in those things. They study "necessity" and "truth" and "the prime mover argument" for years, that way they can devastate idiot Internet atheist crensch when he stupidly proclaims "question-begging!" after go ogling for 5 minutes and reading a Patheos article by a nonexpert. It's fucking astounding that you can't admit that "truth" and "necessity" are as a matter of fact studied by philosophers, not physicists.

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

@expertshitposter

Crensch ago

You are UTTERLY INCAPABLE of explaining why any premises don't adhere to reality.

Except now you know you have the onus to disprove Hawkins, Carroll, and Krauss, not the other way around.

fuckccf ago

You are UTTERLY INCAPABLE of explaining why any premises don't adhere to reality.

Except now you know you have the onus to disprove Hawkins, Carroll, and Krauss, not the other way around.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! IDIOT! YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW THIS WORKS! YOU HAVE THE BURDEN OF REBUTTAL! GODDAMN! HOW MANY TIMES DOES THIS NEED TO BE EXPLAINED TO YOU?! YOU MAKE ATHEISTS LOOK BAD, IDIOT!

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

Crensch ago

YOU HAVE THE BURDEN OF REBUTTAL!

You argue for a first mover using premises not based in reality. I show you that those that actually study reality disagree with you at a fundamental level.

Somehow this means I still owe you some kind of answer? Get real.

fuckccf ago

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

You argue for a first mover using premises not based in reality.

Shallow assertion. You've never demonstrated this.

I show you that those that actually study reality disagree with you at a fundamental level.

Except you don't do that when I ask. Go ahead, share. Give me three quotes about "whatever is changed is changed by something else", one from Krauss, one from Carroll, and one from Hawking. YOU CANT!

Somehow this means I still owe you some kind of answer? Get real.

You've never given any adequate responses.