https://i.sli.mg/pQ87gI.png
All from Eugenenix/Antiracist1-80/JesusofNazareth1-77
RANT:
Every single one is of a raving lunatic who cannot, at any resolution, no matter how small, admit he's wrong. There is no discussion here - this website is his soapbox, and anyone engaging him is targeted by his harassment.
I told him I was done responding to him pending either the desire to do so, or some admission on his part that he was wrong - even for something small like trying to use a biologist's opinions to debunk a physicist's book. No dice.
The fact that I'd have to "ignore" more than a hundred usernames just because of this one person is insane. These accounts, with many thousands of downvoats between them, should not be able to post as much as they are able, and they certainly should not be allowed to be accessed or created as easily as it seems they are.
This really becomes an issue when the admins seem to think that fettering our ability to self-regulate with downvoats is more important than username switching to harass legitimate users.
My inbox is flooded with SPAM freakouts of his, and any response to him winds up just becoming another place for him to spew his message. To find legitimate posts, I have to go through many pages of him asserting that his logic holds to things that do not exist in this universe, and in places where the laws of physics break down.
There is nothing I can do to mute this guy. He changes usernames thirty or more times per day. There's a new username every day.
SUGGESTIONS:
Usernames with under 100ccp should not get to ping people.
They should NOT be able to post bullshit right away, get downvoated, and not get muted.
They should be held to some kind of minimum behavioural standard before having the ability to post TEN TIMES in response to the same person without a response FROM that person. Preferably not more than ONCE; not to a post, not to a comment.
view the rest of the comments →
oedipusaurus_rex ago
If you back him into a corner he gets all huffy and will leave you alone for a bit. You might get a ping every now and then as he links to something in your comment history and calls you a hypocrite due to some conversation you had with him 3 months ago and don't remember. Other than that though he'll leave you alone.
Crensch ago
Backed him into multiple corners. Once that happens, he waits a while before bringing up the same thing that I just destroyed as if I didn't already address it.
Antiracist10 ago
Okay. Let's see. I provide you a few reasonable sentences, and you display to everyone in this thread what the destroying response is.
I am calling you out. PICK A PREMISE and tell me it's false.
Premise 1. The suffering and death of white children, from lack of food, shelter, or medical care, is bad.
Premise 2. If Crensch has the power to prevent something bad from happening to a white child without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, then Crensch should use that power to prevent something bad from happening to a white child.
Premise 3. It makes no moral difference whether the white child Crensch can help is a neighbor's child ten yards from him or a European whose name Crensch shall never know.
Premise 4. The principle makes no distinction between cases in which Crensch is the only person who could possibly do anything and cases in which Crensch is just one among millions in the same position.
Conclusion: The next time Crensch wants to spend his money on something frivolous, (like a new car rather than a used car, or going out to eat at The Olive Garden rather than cooking inexpensively at home), he should instead donate that money to help white children. Their food and shelter, and the satisfaction that you get from helping them, would bring more happiness into the world than if you spent your money on frivolous things.
Let's see your rational response, brainiac. Or will you make a dumb insulting comment and run away from the argument like you always do instead of picking a fucking premise to refute? We'll see. lol
SumYungGuy ago
You are insane.
Antiracist10 ago
Wow what a perfect Crensch response of not picking any premises, you fucking idiot.