You shouldn't have spoken negative words about my kids. I will be a thorn in your side everywhere now get used to it, food stamp.

Oh, is that how it works with you? Whenever you accuse me of something I can just say, "if it's not in this post, you're wrong"?

he is also a repeat record, a deciever overall a very bad person

-dial

-saba

He is, he has no life. He is in love with a married woman. He sits at a computer all day waiting for her to come back .🤣

20 day old username making milquetoast posts constantly, and to the delight of no one, in order to astroturf a "neutral third party" vibe when finally attacking me.

Note the username that happens to look suspiciously like a first and last name, suggesting the naive boomer doxxed himself, but despite my pointing that out early on, he continues to use this username.

Here's anti-Crensch user @m_1 pinging this username for seemingly no reason whatsoever 14 days after its creation.

185 posts in 20 days; nothing but Voat's analog of a Reddit re-post bot. Honestly, an Overton-Window-moving load of reddit-tier "DAE" type posts, too.

1,227 comments in 20 days asking 3 days into the account's existence:

What is this whole Q thing?

And he proceeds to act for all the world like a naive boomer, but gives himself away with a comment in /v/SoapboxBanhammer saying:

1990

For those that don't know, this is a common comment from @zyklon_b, who would accuse users of "raping and murdering a child in 1990". Following which he would simply write "1990", and it became a dogwhistle between SBBH users that liked zyklon.

You can see from his comment history that he had no organic introduction to this concept.

He continues to interact a lot with @m_1 in nests like this, talking about how someone is downvoting all of m_1's comments because they're socializing with him, (An 11 day old account.)

And finally, 3 days after his account creation, he writes this comment response to me:

I talked to the other party you are having problems with and he is very interested in making amends with you. He is just confused as to why he got banned and I explained to him that being that it's your sub you are able to ban him simply for saying something you didn't like. His concern is that's a slippery slope. I suspect you were upset because he said something about a woman you care about which is Honorable. You could explain exactly that to him and I'm sure he would understand (if that is the case). Could you simply unban him and tell him then just say you're not interested in arguing anymore. I think if you did something like that he would think twice before saying disrespectful things in the future. If I am out of bounds for making any of these suggestions let me know and I will but out of it. I am only trying to help and being that it was all posted publicly I'm just giving my opinion.

3 day old account. That is now trying to demoralize me by "asking questions" about "ignoring" literal pedophiles.

SBBH is cancer.

It was 1999 when she died and I didn't kill her. You seem butthurt, basket case.

what have you produced crensch? nothing