Not gonna read 90% of the shit written here, but i was lead here so i will shit out a few thoughts.
SBBH started as a joke subverse whose joke was literally pretending to be a faggot redditor mod. Anyone who wanted could be mod, and then ban random users, who don't even post there, for the most mundane shit. People would be unbanned within 3-24h, and they would be modded so they can ban you back.
It has since somewhat grown out of that joke, and into other jokes, but it generally doesn't ban anyone for more than a day except when gabara doesn't pay attention to his ban ad doesn't clear them. Usually i clean up after him.
There can usually be a clear distinction between "joke" subverses, and "serious" subverses. The distinction comes from weather the topics discussed are political in nature or not. Because censorship is a political weapon. it isn't being carried out to silence a comedian. Its being carried out to silence a political opponent. Politics affect our lives, jokes do not. Since most things can be political in nature, i would consider most voat subverses "political". There can be a sort of in-between subverse, such as DIY, that is nether joke not political. But when in doubt, the default state should be to not censor anything. So almost all subs on voat should never ban/delete. Tagging @PeaceSeeker cuz hes not retarded. Just a christfag :)
SBBH is a 99% joke subverse.
Beatlewhatever subverse is a 100% joke sub.
GA is a 100% political subverse.
WhatYouMissed is a "serious" subverse.
So what @virge is doing is just as bad as what you are doing.
PS, @Glory_Beckons u mad bro? Did a black bull cuck some random waitress you had your eye on? Stay mad bro.
The only fight SBBH ever fought on voat is an anti-censorship one.
You provided no argument ether. Just the usual they spread filth because they are not 100% political 100% of the time drivel with no substance. So there is not point in debating this, so i just say.....stay mad bro.
The only fight SBBH ever fought on voat is an anti-censorship one.
That is a political agenda.
Particularly when it is applied selectively. And enforced with outrage mobbing and shaming rituals and whining to admins to enforce their will with global bans, and unban them after they've clearly broken rules*. And, when all else fails, with "satirical" personal threats. All of which are typical leftist censorship tactics that just seem so very familiar. Where, oh where, have we seen this before? And why would the "anti-censorship" crowd be using the same tactics leftists always use to censor and create echo chambers? Hm.
Of course, this all makes much more sense once you realize SBBH was never about anti-censorship. But only pro open borders. For all subs. Except for theirs.
Now, where have we seen that before?
*: Btw, there are no global rules on Voat against what SBBH calls "censorship" in subs that you own. There are, however, global rules against Spam and Dox. Both of which SBBH giddily violates every chance they get.
the usual they spread filth because they are not 100% political 100% of the time drivel
They're quite welcome to do whatever they want in their containment ghettos, er, I mean, subs. As long as it doesn't affect anyone else. They're "not political", after all, right?
The problems begin when they invade other peoples' subs. To preach, and demand, and enforce, standards and values that they themselves don't live by. They're a bunch of whiny hypocrites, who are actively engaging in censorship, using leftist tactics, and not fighting against it.
An anti jewish one. Its bans that got us here to begin with. Hiding in some tiny website, instead of spreading the wort to a much bigger audience.
Particularly when it is applied selectively.
Not our fault. I advocate outrage against any bans. Maybe even removal of the ability to ban and delete.
"satirical" personal threats
What are you afraid of an internet shitposter on meth? And everyone was told to block him if they don't like him. But...you didn't did you?
But only pro open borders. For all subs. Except for theirs.
Why are you so full of bullshit? Anyone can post there, and SBBH at one point literally sent mod invites to half this website.
Spam refers to advertising, and dox rules are for faggots anyway. What if it was time to dox high ranking jews for RWDS. Would you be against doxxing then too?
engaging in censorship
Where and how? Because gabara counter deleted some shitposts of srzye? Nigger please. Btw, SBBH is the most blocked sub on voat according to putt. Is your political speech being censored, when you post it to a sub where no one looks for political speech, than no one even sees because they blocked it years ago?
A political agenda is a political agenda. Your claim was that SBBH had none. That is a lie. Attempting to pass it off as anything else, just because you happen to agree with it, is disingenuous and manipulative. Just like the Jews you claim to oppose.
Its bans that got us here to begin with. Hiding in some tiny website, instead of spreading the wort to a much bigger audience.
Blaming bans for this is like blaming guns for school shootings. Bans are a tool. Who you ban, and why you ban them, is what makes the difference.
We are here because corporations and administrators bowed to pressure from manufactured outrage mobs and witch hunts. Which is exactly what SBBH is now doing to Voat.
Leftists also claimed to be anti-censorship and the defenders of free speech. Until we dared speak out against them. You are no different from them.
Not our fault. I advocate outrage against any bans. Maybe even removal of the ability to ban and delete.
Nothing ever is, is it.
And leftists advocate outrage against all guns. Maybe even all weapons. Thinking this will cure violence.
You're both wrong. For the same reasons.
What are you afraid of an internet shitposter on meth?
You don't have children, do you?
And everyone was told to block him if they don't like him. But...you didn't did you?
I have most of both SBBH and GA subverses blocked. Which is why I was late to the party and didn't take notice until the shitstorm started manifesting as @puttitout stickies on my frontpage. Guess he didn't get the memo that SBBH is just a joke sub and can't possibly affect anything or anyone since it's not political, huh?
So, yes, I did. Preemptively. You lot still flung shit so far my way that I couldn't help but notice the stench. That's on you.
You could have told him and his pack of degenerates to block @srayzie and GA subs if they didn't like them. But...you didn't did you?
Rules for thee, but not for me.
|>
|3
|
Why are you so full of bullshit? Anyone can post there, and SBBH at one point literally sent mod invites to half this website.
You admit yourself people get banned and comments get deleted in SBBH. Your attempts to rationalize it with various excuses doesn't change that it happens.
Either you are against ALL bans and deletions under any and all circumstances, or you think there are some circumstances when it is okay.
Which is it? If the former, you must be opposed to SBBH bans and deletions. If it's the latter, what business do you have dictating to other subs what exact circumstances do or don't make it okay for them? Just do your thing in your SBBH subs and let others do their thing in their subs. Why do you feel the need to invade other subs and force your rules upon them? That is commie leftist trash behavior.
Freedom is not being able to do whatever, whenever, wherever.
Freedom is being able to draw a line in the sand and say, "This here is mine, and that there is yours. When on mine, you follow my rules. When on yours, I will respect yours."
Is the difference so difficult to understand?
Spam refers to advertising, and dox rules are for faggots anyway. What if it was time to dox high ranking jews for RWDS. Would you be against doxxing then too?
Spam is any noise that derails or distracts from the purpose of the communication venue. If I make a bunch of bots to spam all SBBH subs with randomly generated bot talk, and to upvoat each other while downvoting all of you, would you not take offense to that? Would you not run to Putt for help, complaining that I'm spamming you and you can't use your subs for their intended purpose? No, you'd probably just ban my bots and delete their spam. Wait a minute...
I think guns should be legal. I think murdering someone, just because you don't like them, should be illegal and punished by death.
I think dox should be allowed. I think doxxing a Voat user, and threatening their children, just because you don't like them, should be forbidden and punished with a global ban.
Where and how? Because gabara counter deleted some shitposts of srzye?
I don't care what you do on your subs. Ban and delete away. Just stop being hypocrites about it on other subs.
I'm referring to SBBH having a long running reputation - and priding itself in it - of driving people away from the site and destroying or disrupting subs they don't like, for whatever reason.
Stop dictating to others how they should run their subs, or what they should or shouldn't be discussing there.
That is censorship. Doesn't matter that the weapons you used weren't bans or deletions. It kills free speech all the same.
view the rest of the comments →
ExpertShitposter ago
Not gonna read 90% of the shit written here, but i was lead here so i will shit out a few thoughts.
SBBH started as a joke subverse whose joke was literally pretending to be a faggot redditor mod. Anyone who wanted could be mod, and then ban random users, who don't even post there, for the most mundane shit. People would be unbanned within 3-24h, and they would be modded so they can ban you back.
It has since somewhat grown out of that joke, and into other jokes, but it generally doesn't ban anyone for more than a day except when gabara doesn't pay attention to his ban ad doesn't clear them. Usually i clean up after him.
There can usually be a clear distinction between "joke" subverses, and "serious" subverses. The distinction comes from weather the topics discussed are political in nature or not. Because censorship is a political weapon. it isn't being carried out to silence a comedian. Its being carried out to silence a political opponent. Politics affect our lives, jokes do not. Since most things can be political in nature, i would consider most voat subverses "political". There can be a sort of in-between subverse, such as DIY, that is nether joke not political. But when in doubt, the default state should be to not censor anything. So almost all subs on voat should never ban/delete. Tagging @PeaceSeeker cuz hes not retarded. Just a christfag :)
So what @virge is doing is just as bad as what you are doing.
PS, @Glory_Beckons u mad bro? Did a black bull cuck some random waitress you had your eye on? Stay mad bro.
Glory_Beckons ago
A naive premise, and easily subverted, exposing your entire comment as nonsense:
SBBH routinely and intentionally seeks to affect Voat, and often succeeds, therefore SBBH is political and not a joke subverse.
How original. Nice to see you didn't have any real arguments, but enough sand in your vagina to ping me anyway.
Did something I said hit too close to home?
ExpertShitposter ago
The only fight SBBH ever fought on voat is an anti-censorship one.
You provided no argument ether. Just the usual they spread filth because they are not 100% political 100% of the time drivel with no substance. So there is not point in debating this, so i just say.....stay mad bro.
Glory_Beckons ago
That is a political agenda.
Particularly when it is applied selectively. And enforced with outrage mobbing and shaming rituals and whining to admins to enforce their will with global bans, and unban them after they've clearly broken rules*. And, when all else fails, with "satirical" personal threats. All of which are typical leftist censorship tactics that just seem so very familiar. Where, oh where, have we seen this before? And why would the "anti-censorship" crowd be using the same tactics leftists always use to censor and create echo chambers? Hm.
Of course, this all makes much more sense once you realize SBBH was never about anti-censorship. But only pro open borders. For all subs. Except for theirs.
Now, where have we seen that before?
*: Btw, there are no global rules on Voat against what SBBH calls "censorship" in subs that you own. There are, however, global rules against Spam and Dox. Both of which SBBH giddily violates every chance they get.
They're quite welcome to do whatever they want in their containment ghettos, er, I mean, subs. As long as it doesn't affect anyone else. They're "not political", after all, right?
The problems begin when they invade other peoples' subs. To preach, and demand, and enforce, standards and values that they themselves don't live by. They're a bunch of whiny hypocrites, who are actively engaging in censorship, using leftist tactics, and not fighting against it.
And by they, of course, I mean you.
ExpertShitposter ago
An anti jewish one. Its bans that got us here to begin with. Hiding in some tiny website, instead of spreading the wort to a much bigger audience.
Not our fault. I advocate outrage against any bans. Maybe even removal of the ability to ban and delete.
What are you afraid of an internet shitposter on meth? And everyone was told to block him if they don't like him. But...you didn't did you?
Why are you so full of bullshit? Anyone can post there, and SBBH at one point literally sent mod invites to half this website.
Spam refers to advertising, and dox rules are for faggots anyway. What if it was time to dox high ranking jews for RWDS. Would you be against doxxing then too?
Where and how? Because gabara counter deleted some shitposts of srzye? Nigger please. Btw, SBBH is the most blocked sub on voat according to putt. Is your political speech being censored, when you post it to a sub where no one looks for political speech, than no one even sees because they blocked it years ago?
Glory_Beckons ago
A political agenda is a political agenda. Your claim was that SBBH had none. That is a lie. Attempting to pass it off as anything else, just because you happen to agree with it, is disingenuous and manipulative. Just like the Jews you claim to oppose.
Blaming bans for this is like blaming guns for school shootings. Bans are a tool. Who you ban, and why you ban them, is what makes the difference.
We are here because corporations and administrators bowed to pressure from manufactured outrage mobs and witch hunts. Which is exactly what SBBH is now doing to Voat.
Leftists also claimed to be anti-censorship and the defenders of free speech. Until we dared speak out against them. You are no different from them.
Nothing ever is, is it.
And leftists advocate outrage against all guns. Maybe even all weapons. Thinking this will cure violence.
You're both wrong. For the same reasons.
You don't have children, do you?
I have most of both SBBH and GA subverses blocked. Which is why I was late to the party and didn't take notice until the shitstorm started manifesting as @puttitout stickies on my frontpage. Guess he didn't get the memo that SBBH is just a joke sub and can't possibly affect anything or anyone since it's not political, huh?
So, yes, I did. Preemptively. You lot still flung shit so far my way that I couldn't help but notice the stench. That's on you.
You could have told him and his pack of degenerates to block @srayzie and GA subs if they didn't like them. But...you didn't did you?
Rules for thee, but not for me.
You admit yourself people get banned and comments get deleted in SBBH. Your attempts to rationalize it with various excuses doesn't change that it happens.
Either you are against ALL bans and deletions under any and all circumstances, or you think there are some circumstances when it is okay.
Which is it? If the former, you must be opposed to SBBH bans and deletions. If it's the latter, what business do you have dictating to other subs what exact circumstances do or don't make it okay for them? Just do your thing in your SBBH subs and let others do their thing in their subs. Why do you feel the need to invade other subs and force your rules upon them? That is commie leftist trash behavior.
Freedom is not being able to do whatever, whenever, wherever.
Freedom is being able to draw a line in the sand and say, "This here is mine, and that there is yours. When on mine, you follow my rules. When on yours, I will respect yours."
Is the difference so difficult to understand?
Spam is any noise that derails or distracts from the purpose of the communication venue. If I make a bunch of bots to spam all SBBH subs with randomly generated bot talk, and to upvoat each other while downvoting all of you, would you not take offense to that? Would you not run to Putt for help, complaining that I'm spamming you and you can't use your subs for their intended purpose? No, you'd probably just ban my bots and delete their spam. Wait a minute...
I think guns should be legal. I think murdering someone, just because you don't like them, should be illegal and punished by death.
I think dox should be allowed. I think doxxing a Voat user, and threatening their children, just because you don't like them, should be forbidden and punished with a global ban.
I don't care what you do on your subs. Ban and delete away. Just stop being hypocrites about it on other subs.
I'm referring to SBBH having a long running reputation - and priding itself in it - of driving people away from the site and destroying or disrupting subs they don't like, for whatever reason.
Stop dictating to others how they should run their subs, or what they should or shouldn't be discussing there.
That is censorship. Doesn't matter that the weapons you used weren't bans or deletions. It kills free speech all the same.
ExpertShitposter ago
its party tiem.
i'll respond tomorrow