u/theoldones has a history of labeling people he doesn’t like as voats enemy of the day in order to trick users and censor them through downvote brigading. More recently he has labeled u/thelma and u/shewhomustbeobeyed as pedophile defenders in an attempt to silence dissenting opinions of his witch hunts.
Here he claims u/thelma is a pedophille defenderhere he claims that u/thelma is spreading “shady files” despite being an easily accessible pdf. he retracts his statements that u/thelma is a pedophile, but threatens to accuse him again if u/thelma exposes the witch hunt again.
As for u/shewhomustbeobeyed she criticized the methods of u/theoldones and he wasn’t happy about it
Additionally he goes after obvious trolls such as u/tokui
Lastly, lets review
this
this
and this
Here's the law regarding soliciting CP:
(B) advertises, promotes, presents, distributes, or solicits through the mails, or using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, any material or purported material in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is intended to cause another to believe, that the material or purported material is, or contains—
(i) an obscene visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(ii) a visual depiction of an actual minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
sauce
From Voat's User Agreement:
You may not use Voat to break the law
Conclusion: Soliciting (asking for) child porn from other people on the internet is illegal. Therefore, @theoldones has used voat to break the law. Anyone who calls out his actions or opposes his witchhunt is slandered and brigaded.
view the rest of the comments →
My10thaccount ago
Why do you all wrap yourself up in this stupid internet drama? Do you realize what someone thinks of you on voat is 100% irrelevant and means nothing in real life.
Maggotbait88 ago
¯\_(ツ) _/¯
My10thaccount ago
Well you guys must enjoy it at the end of the day. Can I be involved? Will you make a post about me you can make anything up you want. All I ask is that you be creative, I'll even go along with it. Doesn't matter what it is.
theoldones ago
it'll get you involved with a dude who claims to have fucked a 6 year old: https://archive.fo/T4265
thelma ago
Do you believe that he had sex with that 6 year old, or was it banter ?
theoldones ago
there's plenty of other evidence to act as circumstantial proof (most notably defending the posting of a fetish clip of child being raped), so i lean more towards "real" rather then "banter"
thelma ago
Then you should contact law enforcement.
Have you ?
theoldones ago
i aint got the right info on him to report such a thing
thelma ago
[–] thelma -1 points (+2|-3) 10.5 hours ago
Then you should contact law enforcement.
Have you ?
So the answer is no. You are waiting for him to "totally fuck up" which indicates that you don't believe he's a pedo at all.
You should apologize to all you have called pedos and not apologized to before your bank account runs dry.
theoldones ago
i've directly busted these people as pedos, so, they're pedos.
loli fails the dost test, thus all loli could be banned site-wide if voat so wished.
thelma ago
I am familiar with the DOST court case.
Your lack of comprehension is exampled in your post.
I cannot fix stupid.
theoldones ago
pieceseeker and putt in chat have explicitly stated dost applies to voat.
thelma ago
Its irrelevant....voat can decide whatever it wants as a measuring stick. Using a court case is likely not the best thing to do. Nor have I seen anything that demonstrates that putt has said anything on the subject. So now you have a better understanding of the facts I have seen.
And loli is posted on the site, so it is apparently good on voat; meaning also upon the more narrow CP examination it passes that.
theoldones ago
it can, and word is loli fails dost.
thelma ago
You saying so does not make it so.
theoldones ago
i can pull chatlogs if you like