It seems there is far more to what's going on here than I originally thought. Apologies to Godsangell for coming at this without having done thorough due diligence. (GreatAwakeningMeta)

submitted ago by Crensch

I'll be leaving the info/disinfo argument alone for the time being, until I have a better grasp of the facts.

And I'll no longer entertain poorly sourced or formatted complaints/accusations against narratives or other users. While neither side was entirely wrong, neither side appears to be entirely correct, either.

Thank you for your time and effort up to this point, and apologies for my lack of understanding of all the nuances going on here.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Nosfewratsjews ago

Doesn't really change the fact that GodsAngell is an autistic spammer.

Crensch ago

Nope. Changes what I'm going to do or not do, though. A lot of people don't like her. A lot of people like her. My entering the field of play without knowing the rules or the teams was immature.

I'll do better going forward.

DickTick ago

Dude, you're completely missing the point again. It has nothing to do with liking her or not liking her. This isn't a popularity contest.. You can dig back through our comments, I have given her praise many times when she has done good and I really wish she could slow down just enough to double-check things before she screams them out and capital bold letters, saying that they have been "confirmed" when she's the only person that has confirmed them most of the time..

I like her. Ive said that more than a few times, but this movement is supposed to be about a hell of a lot more than liking each other. Its supposed to be about facts and double-checking those facts and sources and making sure we actually get to the truth and not spread fake news just like we accuse the left and Democrats of doing.

That is, after all, what Q has begged us to do so many times I can't even remember them all.

But what happens when you try to point something out to her that completely proves what she is saying is wrong? She just calls you a shill from that point on, no matter what you say or how good your proof is contrary to her statements.

It has absolutely nothing to do with not "liking" her and everything to do with the health and future of our movement, which there won't be one if we have too many voices like hers.

singlebrain1 ago

^ this

Qdini ago

Yes