You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BraunF14 ago

You call srayzie a heaven sent angel? HAHAHA I laughed this morning. Thanks Crensch. That's hysterical.

Crensch ago

You have reading comprehension issues.

BraunF14 ago

Did you mean something else by this?

"They have already made fake PMs about srayzie, so even a heaven-sent angel wouldn't be immune to their antics."

I mean, it's ok to have problems writing things out clearly. I'm not calling you dumb for it. Just don't say I have problems with reading when you're not writing what you mean correctly. Lemme catch you on an edit of that phrase after this comment.

Crensch ago

If they can fake private messages, even someone who has done nothing wrong at all could be painted as anything they want.

BraunF14 ago

That's not at all what I commented about. I don't care about the substance of the rest of that paragraph. I'm talking about how you falsely claim srayzie is a heavenly angel. Did I read that wrong like you claimed or did you type it wrong? That's why I'm here. I know half of Voat at least would love to know how crayzie...ahem....srayzie is an angel in your eyes.

wokeasfook ago

Read it again. And again. And again until your own question sounds as retarded to you as it does to me. He never said Srayzie is a heaven sent angel. He said even a heaven sent angel wouldn't be immune.

That's actually implying Srayzie isnt a heaven sent angel but that even a bonafide heaven sent angel wouldn't be safe from these types of people.

I'm assuming crensch stopped replying so as not to waste his time with either an idiot or someone deliberately misrepresenting what he said.

Crensch ago

He really is quite stupid.

Thank you for speaking up and letting him know that it's his reading comprehension at fault here.