You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SuckaFree ago

Only a microchip with networking links can do what y'all are proposing. Hence, the Boeing 737 Max groundings, the F-22 and

F-35 groundings, and Airbus's problems with similar systems.

Solid state gyroscopic systems is the future tech stemming from AHARS, Aircraft Heading Altitude Reference System. It's what our military aircraft use alongside Sat linked and network linked GPS coming from sats, AWKS, and ground based radar/lidar/laser guidance systems. You make that fail, the plane crashes. Pilot can't do shit to stop it. Seen the results of this system failure in the Navy. No bruno, to say the least.

DemonNancy ago

Husband worked at the BigB for nearly 30 yrs as an avionics specialist. From what he says, there is no receptor in the avionics to accomplish this remote control idea. He has vast experience in avionic A6s, the Star Wars program under Reagan, F-18s and more. So unless someone has specific technical knowlege to the contrary, this is just fantasy you guys are spinning.

They got into the cockpits of those planes. It's simple. Making anymore than that is folly and makes us look stupid.

SuckaFree ago

Bullshit. I've seen the military tech myself...in the fuckiing 90's. I know what I saw and what I'm talking about. Before u was an Ordnanceman and EOD tech, I went to Aviation Electronics School. Learned all about wiring and fixing cockpit components.