This is something interesting I just discovered. I'm not sure that anyone has put this together yet. Additional digging is appreciated as I am time limited:
-
Timothy J. Klausutis is the widower of Lori Klausutis, the woman found dead in MSNBC Joe Scarborough's office in the 1st Congressional District of FL (now held by Matt Gaetz).
-
T. Klausutis published the following letter on 21 May 2020 to Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter, asking him to remove the tweets from PDJT regarding Lori's mysterious death: https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6968-jack-dorsey-letter/ffaa205b1364518c15b3/optimized/full.pdf#page=1
-
I noticed that the letter was signed "Timothy J. Klausutis, PhD". A doctor of what, you ask? I'm not sure, but Mr. K. has contributed to a lot of research papers on the subject of inertial guidance systems: https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/2058811655_Timothy_J_Klausutis
-
So what? Well, recall that HRC's Rose Law Firm handled the patent filing/petition for the QRS11, a solid-state gyroscopic guidance system. It is rumored that HRC/RLF managed to strongarm the patent holders for their own financial gain. The QRS11 and it's later versions are rumored to be at the heart of the Deep State's ability to skyjack and down a plane or helicopter: https://abeldanger.blogspot.com/2013/08/1633-marine-links-clintons-serco-fadec.html
-
Also interesting, is Mr. K.'s involvement in DARPA-funded projects (page 155): https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fexocorriges.com%2Fdoc%2F27235.doc
-
Edit: Most recent Q post: https://qmap.pub/read/4322 refers to ILS - or Instrument Landing System - part of the guidance system. ILS definition: "It is defined by the International Telecommunication Union as a service provided by a station as follows: A radionavigation system which provides aircraft with horizontal and vertical guidance just before and during landing and, at certain fixed points, indicates the distance to the reference point of landing."
Q posts about ILS, POTUS posts about Scarborogh, victim's husband is involved in guidance systems as was/is HRC. What are the odds? What other info can we add here?
Edit: If anyone wants to share this on Twitter or other platform, please do. The more eyeballs on this, the better.
Edit: Late edit here, another anon pointed out something so very obvious, yet overlooked - 2 plane crashes - F22 and F35 - In the last week. Originating from Elgin AFB. Elgin is in FL1 district.
@mac1221 @molochhunter @darkknight111 @vindicator @bopper
view the rest of the comments →
moderator99 ago
His wife was killed less than a week before 9/11.
Was it a threat against him to keep him silent?
Patranon1 ago
Hmmmm. Guided planes?
RecceRat ago
Before anyone here shouts me down for even suggesting this let alone giving it any element of truth or validation, I do not know enough about the subject?
What subject, well it's about remote viewing!
As tends to happen when digging around, a few days ago I ended up watching a 1 1/2 documentary type upload on Y/T about remote viewing. For a small synopsis, the person in charge asked two of his so called best "remote viewers" to do there stuff, they were told nothing about any subject and this was recently, many years after 9/11
You watched both of the remote viewers describe and draw on a white board what they were seeing, both saw very similar things and undoubtedly it was the twin towers, the destruction, even referencing the dust and particles etc.
But the piece that struck me was when one of the viewers was describing and drawing clearly a cockpit of an airplane, but he was more disturbed because (and yes you have to have an element of believe in this stuff) he described the pilot frantically trying to control the aircraft but couldn't. He described and drew them turning off systems etc to try and regain control of the aircraft, he said in the viewing that nothing the pilots could do would make the controls respond to the pilots input.
Yes it's a massive leap to make, but reading this post today I was immediately struck about the pilots having zero control over the flight controls in that remote viewing session.
If anyone wants the link (I found it interesting to watch) then I will dig back and provide it.
GhostOfSwartz ago
Yes please provide link. Right up my alley. Thanks friend!
RecceRat ago
Hi fren, sure I've dug it out. You may like to watch the whole thing but if you just want the section I've referenced about the cockpit etc, go to 1:33:34.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=671ziiLlBBs
There is a part 2 also. See what you think?
GodAndGlory ago
Nothing is off the table for me anymore. CIA docs are even more evidence of remote viewing if you needed it
Rings true and makes sense with Q's statistic of plane crashes. Technology can easily be co-opted by another party.
Hoppinmad ago
This is interesting. There is plenty of examples of humans ability to somewhat do this. This is not the best example but imagine if you had a job where you trained in this everyday and the training had been going on for decades.
https://rviewer.com/rob-lowe-encounters-remote-viewing/