The Intern's Husband | GreatAwakening

submitted 4.8 years ago by Blacksmith21

This is something interesting I just discovered. I'm not sure that anyone has put this together yet. Additional digging is appreciated as I am time limited:

Timothy J. Klausutis is the widower of Lori Klausutis, the woman found dead in MSNBC Joe Scarborough's office in the 1st Congressional District of FL (now held by Matt Gaetz).
T. Klausutis published the following letter on 21 May 2020 to Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter, asking him to remove the tweets from PDJT regarding Lori's mysterious death: https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6968-jack-dorsey-letter/ffaa205b1364518c15b3/optimized/full.pdf#page=1
I noticed that the letter was signed "Timothy J. Klausutis, PhD". A doctor of what, you ask? I'm not sure, but Mr. K. has contributed to a lot of research papers on the subject of inertial guidance systems: https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/2058811655_Timothy_J_Klausutis
So what? Well, recall that HRC's Rose Law Firm handled the patent filing/petition for the QRS11, a solid-state gyroscopic guidance system. It is rumored that HRC/RLF managed to strongarm the patent holders for their own financial gain. The QRS11 and it's later versions are rumored to be at the heart of the Deep State's ability to skyjack and down a plane or helicopter: https://abeldanger.blogspot.com/2013/08/1633-marine-links-clintons-serco-fadec.html
Also interesting, is Mr. K.'s involvement in DARPA-funded projects (page 155): https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fexocorriges.com%2Fdoc%2F27235.doc
Edit: Most recent Q post: https://qmap.pub/read/4322 refers to ILS - or Instrument Landing System - part of the guidance system. ILS definition: "It is defined by the International Telecommunication Union as a service provided by a station as follows: A radionavigation system which provides aircraft with horizontal and vertical guidance just before and during landing and, at certain fixed points, indicates the distance to the reference point of landing."

Q posts about ILS, POTUS posts about Scarborogh, victim's husband is involved in guidance systems as was/is HRC. What are the odds? What other info can we add here?

Edit: If anyone wants to share this on Twitter or other platform, please do. The more eyeballs on this, the better.

Edit: Late edit here, another anon pointed out something so very obvious, yet overlooked - 2 plane crashes - F22 and F35 - In the last week. Originating from Elgin AFB. Elgin is in FL1 district.

@mac1221 @molochhunter @darkknight111 @vindicator @bopper

265 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

literallyyourmom 4.8 years ago

Mr. Klausutis was paid a visit.

link

SuckaFree 4.8 years ago

By Scarborough, Brzezinski, & Assoc, LLC

link

Headwest127 4.8 years ago

Could hubby have been in on the guidance systems for the 9/11 planes, wife figures it out and tells boss (because hes an important politician)? Boss Joe is told to 'fix' the problem.... the rest is history.

link

User7867 4.8 years ago

Or maybe Mr. K was resistant, and Mrs. K's departure was used as leverage.

link

SuckaFree 4.8 years ago

Those planes were turned into drones. This system isn't related.

link

Headwest127 4.8 years ago

Are you saying that a navigation system is unrelated to unmanned flight?

link

SuckaFree 4.8 years ago

It is if it's controlled on the ground remotely within sight range. I've seen it in use in The Navy watching our pilots shoot down drones.

link

SuckaFree 4.8 years ago

Yes. The early drones the military used for target practice were just some people in a hangar or on the flight line with a high dollar remote control, similar to what the scale model jets use. In the late 80's/early 90's computer screens and a flight stick were used. All they had to ref headings was the jets gun camera. Or a spotter with binocs on the ground. They didn't even know what altitude they were at. They didn't need it. Nor did they need radar. Because the planes weren't designed to land successfully. If the training ended and a drone was left over, they would use it for SAM practice, or just drive it into the ground.

Later, in the 90's they started using the jets computers. They would just preprogram a flight course. Again, if the plane survived, at the end it would be destroyed by SAM or crashed. Same concept.

So, if the rumors about remote controlled flight being used are accurate, there was no need for the "pilots" to even really be alive. Someone else was controlling them remotely.

Could also explain why remote viewers were watching but saw the pilots unable to do anything. At least the two planes that struck the towers. If flight 93's data recorder is accurate, but remote control was being used, it wouldn't have really matterd what those Patriots did to take back the plane. It was destined to crash...via remote control. Which would explain why 10 guys couldn't defeat 3 terrorists in the cockpit before plummeting a couple miles to their deaths. Even travelling at 500 mph, you'd have enough time to gain control of the cockpit, reorient the aircraft and save it from crashing. The guys that took it back didn't stand a chance.

Also, in this day and age of sat gps and networked radar use through AWKS and the NOAA, the ILS system is now obsolete. Pilots dont even really fly the damned things anymore. It's all done through the auto pilot system linked with Sat GPS and the air ship's radar, which is tied into NOAA for weather refs.

link

Headwest127 4.8 years ago

First, I agree with your assessment of the 9/11 planes and I have seen the remote viewing videos - they are compelling. However, I feel like a guidance system is not only related, but entirely necessary to pull off everything you describe.

link

RecceRat 4.8 years ago

And if you look at the radar overlay, the aircraft involved do some strange things, almost like over flying each other?

One of the data recorders (black boxes) was definitely only a bench test unit! You see when an aircraft is assembled, and the first time power is introduced to the systems, the data recorder will assign a special code into the bootstrap so it can be identified to that specific aircraft for life. It can't be switched out and simply put on a different aircraft because in case of an accident they have to be certain which come from which aircraft.

At least one data recorder had just a bunch of 00000's in that bootstrap (it's ROM) so can't be altered, which means it came from most likely a test equipment type recorder.

Another flights navigation data was way off when they released the official repors. They said it was at a certain gate but the nav data put it somewhere else, also that data put it south of the runway by several hundred yards on takeoff, it just can't be so as the nav system is checked and position entered exactly at the gate before moving anywhere otherwise it's useless! You couldn't do an ILS approach with nav kit being that far out.