So is this what that huge list of [s] is about on every GA page I open ? This is a waste of bandwidth for mobile users IMO.
IMO blocking people from posting at least on a site where you can just ban troublesome users and remove submissions is basically censorship. You're removing the voice of any legitimate newbie who might come and ask questions unless they get approval to post.
I know you have a hard time keeping up with the spam and this seems to be the easiest solution but it is not the best. I am pretty sure you have had at least a year to vet more people to help remove spam and porn and ban bad users after at least one/or more warning.
Also ... why is all the blame always going to SBBH ? One of the tactics of a shill is to defect blame to cause division. Will be probably downvoated for this comment alone but there have been one or two SBBH peeps here for as long as I remember and have never seen anything to bad from those accounts.
So is this what that huge list of [s] is about on every GA page I open ? This is a waste of bandwidth for mobile users IMO.
Some extra words on a page are going to make or break it when you open up pics and video? Come the fuck on.
IMO blocking people from posting at least on a site where you can just ban troublesome users and remove submissions is basically censorship.
Listen, you fantastically stupid twat, when a bot can be made to create new usernames and immediately make 3 spam submissions, then upvote them to the front page, there's nothing any number of mods can do, because we'd have to delete submissions and ban usernames constantly to keep the sub from being overrun. In a 6 hour span I banned 50 usernames and deleted 150 submissions, and that was only limited by the delay of the website updating to let me see what had been posted every 6 mins or so.
I did all that and I still could not keep up with the spam.
So honestly, go fuck yourself, you self-righteous, naive little bitch.
You're removing the voice of any legitimate newbie who might come and ask questions unless they get approval to post.
Want to know how much of a fuckup you are both online and in real life?
QUESTION POSTS ARE AGAINST THE RULES, FUCKWIT.
I know you have a hard time keeping up with the spam and this seems to be the easiest solution but it is not the best.
Eat a dick.
I am pretty sure you have had at least a year to vet more people to help remove spam and porn and ban bad users after at least one/or more warning.
You really don't know shit about anything here.
Also ... why is all the blame always going to SBBH ?
Because that's who's perpetrating the attacks?
One of the tactics of a shill is to defect blame to cause division. Will be probably downvoated for this comment alone but there have been one or two SBBH peeps here for as long as I remember and have never seen anything to bad from those accounts.
"But not all X are like that!" - says every self-righteous left-leaning faggot that has never had to live with or be around or suffer the consequences of their "NAXALT" philosophy.
Nobody asked for your input. Nobody wanted your input. Your input is the product of a diseased mind that thinks it knows best when it doesn't even know that one of the main rules - that had a reminder stickied for a week last month - is NO QUESTION POSTS.
Take your Dunning-Kruger bullshit somewhere else, concern troll.
Posted automatically (#88457) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Crensch: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Chempergrill)
Posted automatically (#88456) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Crensch: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Chempergrill)
Wow ...your upset ! Do you really think I deserved that ?
Now I see why people dislike you are under the assumption that your viewpoint is the only one to consider and when someone challenges that you get toxic. To think I have also defended you
Wow ...your upset ! Do you really think I deserved that ?
Tone fallacy. Projection. Know-it-all grandstanding like he has a clue doesn't like being told he doesn't.
Now I see why people dislike you are under the assumption that your viewpoint is the only one to consider and when someone challenges that you get toxic.
You didn't even present a valid viewpoint.
Your first line was absurd from the outset, given the difference in data usage from text, pics, and video. Unless you're going to tell me that you have images and videos BLOCKED somehow, it's complete and utter horseshit.
Your second line is claiming what I'm doing is censorship in order to lead to your third line...
... that shows you are not only ignorant of the rules, but that you support one of the most easily exploited vectors of attack against forums like this.
In fact, nothing you said was valid, even as just a viewpoint. Anyone paying attention to the meta, the rules, what's going on, at ANY level, can see that your comment is beyond suspect. It's laughable. Absurd. So disconnected from reality that one questions either your sanity or you $$allegiance$$.
To think I have also defended you.
Money does strange things to people. So does stupidity.
Without Voats IP logs that I doubt you have access too you have no proof of claims vs SBBH if you get proof then blame them all you want without it is is just hot air.
This nigger thinks I need IP-log proof, or that IP-logs ARE proof in and of themselves, or that VPNs don't exist. If this isn't a bought/paid account, I don't know what is.
Looks like someone conveniently forgot that there was once restrictions in place which made moderation of account/submission spam at least a little easier. https://archive.md/JsvGd
Now taking shots at you for taking measures to address the apparent disappearance of some of those restrictions.
That sounds familiar. Someone else has also accused @Crensch of having access to Voat's IPs XD. If I remember correctly, that same someone has also accused @Vindicator of such thing. Interesting!
Listen ! I am not trying to put you down, I just believe the simpler solution is not always the best one, I understand your dilemma and I hope this is just a stopgap solution untill a better way to mitigate bots can be found. I browse New enough to see quite a few spam posts (mostly on Anon QRV site) to have an inkling of what is going on.
Listen ! I am just questioning this move from what I believe is a free speech perspective
No, you're attacking my decision for stupid reasons based on stupid ideas that show you either have no clue what's going on, or are paid to seem like you are a newbie.
In no way am I attacking you.
That's exactly what you're doing.
I just believe the simpler solution is not always the best one, and history has taught me that projected blame is very effective tool for sowing discord.
You just assigned blame by calling it "censorship", and whining about newbies that couldn't do what you said they should be able to do anyway.
I understand your dilemma and I hope this is just a stopgap solution until a better way to mitigate bots can be found.
That is likely to not be the case. Adimin is AWOL and unlikely to do anything about their spam.
I browse New enough to see quite a few spam posts (mostly on Anon QRV site) to have an inkling of what is going on.
No, you don't have an inkling.
I don't Envy you I know the weight of responsibility you feel.
I don't believe you. Everything you wrote was targeted at me and divisive. If you're not a bad actor, you should apply to get money for being one, because that's exactly what you did here.
Ok I guess the word "censorship" is emotionally charged it was not meant as an attack just an observation ! Maybe, I should have said having to ask mods for permission to submit on a free speech platform seems to be synonymous with censorship at least to me ! There are other ways to defeat bots especially these low energy ones lately like an anti-spam plugin, or an extra step like a non-spyware version of captcha/skill testing question (on a gif,jpg,to make it harder for bot program to read) on registration. One change I have been wanting is the ability to report obvious spam posts without having to go into post itself.
Ok I guess the word "censorship" is emotionally charged it was not meant as an attack just an observation !
Emotionally charged? It's directly accusatory.
Maybe, I should have said having to ask mods for permission to submit on a free speech platform seems to be synonymous with censorship at least to me !
Does not change the fact that you think it's censorship.
There are other ways to defeat bots especially these low energy ones lately like an anti-spam plugin
XD I am badging you "A king for a day" badge, in spirit! A Detective badge would be nicer, but you know those fuckers would shit their pants for months. --PuttItOut
view the rest of the comments →
Adarcer ago
So is this what that huge list of [s] is about on every GA page I open ? This is a waste of bandwidth for mobile users IMO.
IMO blocking people from posting at least on a site where you can just ban troublesome users and remove submissions is basically censorship. You're removing the voice of any legitimate newbie who might come and ask questions unless they get approval to post.
I know you have a hard time keeping up with the spam and this seems to be the easiest solution but it is not the best. I am pretty sure you have had at least a year to vet more people to help remove spam and porn and ban bad users after at least one/or more warning.
Also ... why is all the blame always going to SBBH ? One of the tactics of a shill is to defect blame to cause division. Will be probably downvoated for this comment alone but there have been one or two SBBH peeps here for as long as I remember and have never seen anything to bad from those accounts.
Crensch ago
Some extra words on a page are going to make or break it when you open up pics and video? Come the fuck on.
Listen, you fantastically stupid twat, when a bot can be made to create new usernames and immediately make 3 spam submissions, then upvote them to the front page, there's nothing any number of mods can do, because we'd have to delete submissions and ban usernames constantly to keep the sub from being overrun. In a 6 hour span I banned 50 usernames and deleted 150 submissions, and that was only limited by the delay of the website updating to let me see what had been posted every 6 mins or so.
I did all that and I still could not keep up with the spam.
So honestly, go fuck yourself, you self-righteous, naive little bitch.
Want to know how much of a fuckup you are both online and in real life?
QUESTION POSTS ARE AGAINST THE RULES, FUCKWIT.
Eat a dick.
You really don't know shit about anything here.
Because that's who's perpetrating the attacks?
"But not all X are like that!" - says every self-righteous left-leaning faggot that has never had to live with or be around or suffer the consequences of their "NAXALT" philosophy.
Nobody asked for your input. Nobody wanted your input. Your input is the product of a diseased mind that thinks it knows best when it doesn't even know that one of the main rules - that had a reminder stickied for a week last month - is NO QUESTION POSTS.
Take your Dunning-Kruger bullshit somewhere else, concern troll.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ShitCrenschSays submission by @Chempergrill.
Posted automatically (#88457) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Crensch: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Chempergrill)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ShitCrenschSays submission by @Chempergrill.
Posted automatically (#88456) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Crensch: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Chempergrill)
Adarcer ago
Wow ...your upset ! Do you really think I deserved that ?
Now I see why people dislike you are under the assumption that your viewpoint is the only one to consider and when someone challenges that you get toxic. To think I have also defended you
Farmerberry ago
The short answer would be :"Don't upset the man with the delete key".
Crensch ago
Tone fallacy. Projection. Know-it-all grandstanding like he has a clue doesn't like being told he doesn't.
You didn't even present a valid viewpoint.
Your first line was absurd from the outset, given the difference in data usage from text, pics, and video. Unless you're going to tell me that you have images and videos BLOCKED somehow, it's complete and utter horseshit.
Your second line is claiming what I'm doing is censorship in order to lead to your third line...
... that shows you are not only ignorant of the rules, but that you support one of the most easily exploited vectors of attack against forums like this.
In fact, nothing you said was valid, even as just a viewpoint. Anyone paying attention to the meta, the rules, what's going on, at ANY level, can see that your comment is beyond suspect. It's laughable. Absurd. So disconnected from reality that one questions either your sanity or you $$allegiance$$.
Money does strange things to people. So does stupidity.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
@Vindicator @MolochHunter @grace8 @argosciv
This nigger thinks I need IP-log proof, or that IP-logs ARE proof in and of themselves, or that VPNs don't exist. If this isn't a bought/paid account, I don't know what is.
argosciv ago
Looks like someone conveniently forgot that there was once restrictions in place which made moderation of account/submission spam at least a little easier. https://archive.md/JsvGd
Now taking shots at you for taking measures to address the apparent disappearance of some of those restrictions.
grace8 ago
And he thinks you have access to IP logs because SBBH has such access.
MadWorld ago
That sounds familiar. Someone else has also accused @Crensch of having access to Voat's IPs XD. If I remember correctly, that same someone has also accused @Vindicator of such thing. Interesting!
argosciv ago
https://searchvoat.co/?st=comments&t=IP+logs&r=Crensch&nsfw=on&o=on
https://searchvoat.co/?st=comments&t=IP+address&r=Crensch&nsfw=on&o=on
https://searchvoat.co/?st=comments&t=IP+addresses&r=Crensch&nsfw=on&o=on
Summary: NHFP, EYJP, ES, Tallest_skil, SBBH
Oh, and TWOS: https://archive.md/EQELs
Anyone shocked? Didn't think so.
@Crensch @Vindicator
Adarcer ago
Listen ! I am not trying to put you down, I just believe the simpler solution is not always the best one, I understand your dilemma and I hope this is just a stopgap solution untill a better way to mitigate bots can be found. I browse New enough to see quite a few spam posts (mostly on Anon QRV site) to have an inkling of what is going on.
Crensch ago
No, you're attacking my decision for stupid reasons based on stupid ideas that show you either have no clue what's going on, or are paid to seem like you are a newbie.
That's exactly what you're doing.
You just assigned blame by calling it "censorship", and whining about newbies that couldn't do what you said they should be able to do anyway.
That is likely to not be the case. Adimin is AWOL and unlikely to do anything about their spam.
No, you don't have an inkling.
I don't believe you. Everything you wrote was targeted at me and divisive. If you're not a bad actor, you should apply to get money for being one, because that's exactly what you did here.
Adarcer ago
Ok I guess the word "censorship" is emotionally charged it was not meant as an attack just an observation ! Maybe, I should have said having to ask mods for permission to submit on a free speech platform seems to be synonymous with censorship at least to me ! There are other ways to defeat bots especially these low energy ones lately like an anti-spam plugin, or an extra step like a non-spyware version of captcha/skill testing question (on a gif,jpg,to make it harder for bot program to read) on registration. One change I have been wanting is the ability to report obvious spam posts without having to go into post itself.
Crensch ago
Emotionally charged? It's directly accusatory.
Does not change the fact that you think it's censorship.
HAHAHAHA get the fuck out of here.
You cannot possibly be legit.
@Vindicator @MolochHunter @grace8 @argosciv @MadWorld
Somebody tell me this guy can be real here.
argosciv ago
This pretty much says it all:
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3626300/22270641/4/ | https://archive.md/2YlO2
Sooo not worth anyone's time. There's a term for what he/she is doing, but I won't go blurting it out here.
MadWorld ago
XD I am badging you "A king for a day" badge, in spirit! A Detective badge would be nicer, but you know those fuckers would shit their pants for months. --PuttItOut
Disclaimer: the quote was a fake XD