If the DS will Threaten Children to get Rid of our Subs Mods, imagine what a well-Intentioned politician faces ! (GreatAwakening)

submitted ago by grace8

This is the greatest argument for a Trump second term. He is a fighter and is standing up to them.

If we just see him really prosecute some of the DS, there will be no stopping him. Many don't believe he is really going to do it.

We need to stand up to these attacks

When you see a new account posting anti Trump threads, go to their list of comments and submissions and vote them all down. Dont waste time talking to them. Just down vote them to hell. If 10 people hand out 100 down votes that is 1000 points. Takes about an hour to give 100 down votes this way.

SearchVoatBot ago

This submission was linked from this v/GreatAwakening comment by @BadPenny.

Posted automatically (#51452) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@grace8: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @BadPenny)

SearchVoatBot ago

This submission was linked from this v/whatever comment by @70times7.

Posted automatically (#45708) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

kestrel9 ago

@Bopper please see reported log, not Q related

bopper ago

Crensch removed it, thanks..

kestrel9 ago

thank you :)

bopper ago

@MolochHunter @Crensch

Should we remove?

Crensch ago

Removed.

bopper ago

Yes, saw that earlier, thanks..

kestrel9 ago

np, OP is off topic and arguably vote brigading. Hasn't posted in a month, and then two months. Potentially a forum slide attempt imho

bopper ago

Yeah, it should be removed.

SearchVoatBot ago

This submission was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @think-.

Posted automatically (#45420) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

GoatWatcher ago

If you need mods I'd like to throw my hat in. I won't be able to be on 24/7 but I can prune the porn and obvious shills. Plus I don't have any kids or family they can use against me

drmckoy ago

They're also watching us.

70times7 ago

Wait, the deep state made your mod take nudes and put them on the internet?

Really?

grace8 ago

A shill who bragged about buying a house with the proceeds from his employment as a troll attacking conservative sites and his cohorts doxed her and threatened her and her children. They then threatened a second mod's children who left the next day. Who do you think is paying the guys salary? Who do you think is dictating the parameters of his behavior?

Publishing pictures of yourself is stupid, but it does not make it acceptable to use them to threaten you, spread them, claim you are having an affair and then threaten to rape your children.

70times7 ago

2 or 3 clicks to get her personal info.

Like a phone book.

Stupidity yo. Not the deep state.

grace8 ago

Strayzie said she had deleted the pics years ago.

grace8 ago

They were PMing the mods constantly with harrassing threats. They were recruiting a troll army and acting in unison=brigading. They were telling their troll army to post porn.

70times7 ago

Welcome to the internet.

MudPuddlePie ago

What do people not get about "just because you can, doesn't mean you should." This is the whole problem. Just because you make a mistake in being anon doesn't mean people should be able to ruin your business, your life, threaten your kids and your family.

It doesn't matter if an anon leaves a door open, no one should walk thru it. That's blaming the victim.

GoatWatcher ago

Welcome to the Internet. There be bad people out there so you might want to learn how to protect yourself. You know kinda like real life

MudPuddlePie ago

No sh*t, Sherlock. Everyone slides right past the point to "it's the internet" without addressing the truth in the statement.

That is alarming and a huge problem...making an excuse for it instead of understanding the evil of it and either standing up against it or changing it.

70times7 ago

Welcome to the internet

StarAnon ago

I thought vote manipulation was a banning offense.

grace8 ago

If I go and look at a users comments and disagree with them I can down vote them all I want. So can you. We all need to take responsibility to do this when we find a new account attacking Q and who looks like a shill. I told Quench I was doing this and he said it was awesome. Difference of opinion is different than attacks. Attack has to be met with concerted counter-attack. Mods have called for us all to down vote attackers as well.

MDEneverdies1488 ago

Fucking retard, kill yourself. I hope you go suck Trump's dick some more like a battered wife that keeps coming home after every let down. How do you genuinely believe any of this shit? You're a brainlet that has invested too much of your time and effort to admit you are wrong.

Please don't procreate

grace8 ago

This reply tells me all I need to know about you. Thanks very much.

MDEneverdies1488 ago

Have a nice night, fella

StarAnon ago

Yes, but vote manipulation is what you're asking us to do. To go to someone's page, and downvote all the comments, you're just voting to destroy that persons ability to vote. The comments are out of context. You're asking people to bully someone into agreeing with you.
I was led to believe that was a banning offense that the algorithms here are set to target. If it's a banning offense, people should know ahead of time, fair? If not, then they should know that too.

grace8 ago

Reddits definition of voter manipulation. I have not done anything against these rules: Using multiple accounts, voting services, or any other software to increase or decrease vote scores. Asking people to vote up or down certain posts, either on Reddit itself or through social networks, messaging, etc. for personal gain. Forming or joining a group that votes together, either on a specific post, a user's posts, posts from a domain, etc.

Voats user agreement does not list vote manipulation or define it.
Here is a post on vote manipulation. It discusses brigading which I think would be me post a post saying I am recruiting for users to go and down vote a specific users specific post or posts. It talks about using multiple accounts to upvote yourself or give yourself the ability to give multiple downvotes to someone.

https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/3240308And here is another post by Putt on vote manipulation: https://voat.co/v/announcements/1639027

I am not brigading any one 1. I have no alt accounts. 2. I am not recruiting people to vote down a specific person's posts. But I am saying you are allowed to use your one vote as you see fit.

By the way,You said I am using my vote to bully someone into agreeing with me. I do not care if anyone agrees with me or not. I do care if this sub gets attacked and good content people get driven away by spam, attacks, etc. Our new board owner told us to take responsibility for protecting this sub by increasing how much we down vote. If you encounter someone who you think is a shill out to destroy the sub, I encourage you to use your down votes to prevent them from being able to post on our sub. Same thing your new mod said.

StarAnon ago

This isn't Reddit. Yes, use your vote to up or down. You're speaking of going to another user's account, and just downvoting all of their comments. Recommending everyone to do that to a person is brigading. I didn't comment to argue. Clarification on what the rules are is fair to those being recruited to participate in these activities is fair, in my opinion. I understand your argument. I don't think it's a prudent, or fair practice, and yes, I believe it's bullying people into submission.

grace8 ago

What do you do with a bully but stand up to them. That's the only thing that works with a bully. It does not seem like you understand at all. Its clear you dont want to argue so I wont take it further than just one last attempt to clarify what I am saying.

Brigading would be if I said to you, hey user x just posted in GA. Go over and down vote his comment/ post. Making a general statement in advance that in the future to use your down vote any comments in a persons post history who is attacking a community is not brigading. Brigading is if I posted saying I am recruiting a troll army to attack GA and destroy the sub. That is exactly what Zyklon B did. He directed his troll army to post porn in QRV and his battle cry was 1990 (meaning post it 1990 times).

Your position is that one person can't use their vote to protect their sub from an attack that comes in numbers strong enough to disrupt the exchange of info. That's how subs die. I'm on solid ground since the main mod here approved what I did. In addition, he said in his recent post that the responsibility to protect the sub lies with each of us. He directed us to use your votes to protect the sub or loose the sub.

StarAnon ago

I understood you from the OP.