| GreatAwakening

submitted 5.5 years ago by [deleted]

146 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

lol

great post. The lion anecdote was awesome

I wanna tell everyone reading this that there's 2 ways to go. You can get out there and stand by @Cresnsch and slug it out against the jackal pack, or you can take all the assholes on that list and block user to starve them of oxygen

As for me, well. I'm thinking for the LONGEVITY of this subverse I probably need to maintain what ive been doing - and thats to limit my Voat participation beyond this subverse

A large part of Srayzie and Shizy's vulnerability resulted from them fighting battles in other subverses

I'm thinking I need to be Captain Kurtz here. I've broken the Chain of Command from the Voat ball busters, and if they want me, they gotta come boating up this meekong delta river to fukkn GET me.

Now thats a wiser long term strategy but it shames me that I cant get out there swinging in support of Crensch - I'd appreciate some of you cats getting on out there

Apologies Mr @Crensch

I hope you dont think lesser of me

great post Mr @shit_alt_lmao , you cheeky 10 day old account, you. Im sure I know you as some other user, somewhere, somehow

link

Crensch 5.5 years ago

I don't think I support this post. I don't know that Alt and I don't want other people in the crossfire. I'm not a leader. I'm not really one of the Q people.

I will fight for them and win this all on my own. They can make their voices heard, or they can sit back and enjoy the show. The only thing I wanted was for them to support you or others that were trying to fight for them.

I'm making my own moves and countermoves and would consider something like this more of a burden than an asset. Most of these folks are, quite frankly, unequipped to deal with this.

Not a single one of them needs to support me or follow me.

I think this submission is a troll.

link

argosciv 5.5 years ago

I've flaired the 2 v/ProtectVoat posts attempting to capitalize on this submission as "possible misinfo", in line with the "possible disinformation" flair this submission now has.

https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3253743/

https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3253901/

@Vindicator @MolochHunter @bopper @kestrel9

Edit 1: was a fix from "possible disinfo" to "possible disinformation"

Edit 2:

No, zyklon, you can try to spin my intent all you like, but if Rott's "concerns" were "legit", I'd be very fucking surprised. Moreover, my concern that the submission author was creating drama for Rott (or whomever in your camp) to, himself, spin as Crensch being behind the post is definitely legitimate and stands to reason far more than Rott's.

I'm also not the only one who smelled bullshit from the OP.

All 3 submissions deserve to be flaired appropriately on the grounds of what appears to be manufactured drama.

link

SearchVoatBot 5.5 years ago

This comment was linked from this v/SoapboxBanhammer submission by @zyklon_b.

^{Posted automatically (#44797) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

link

SearchVoatBot 5.5 years ago

This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @zyklon_b.

^{Posted automatically (#44675) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

link

Dismember 5.5 years ago

I've flaired the one linking to this thread Resolved since I saw this was deleted. I did see your original tag there previously but when I tagged it there was no tag at all.