I wanna tell everyone reading this that there's 2 ways to go. You can get out there and stand by @Cresnsch and slug it out against the jackal pack, or you can take all the assholes on that list and block user to starve them of oxygen
As for me, well. I'm thinking for the LONGEVITY of this subverse I probably need to maintain what ive been doing - and thats to limit my Voat participation beyond this subverse
A large part of Srayzie and Shizy's vulnerability resulted from them fighting battles in other subverses
I'm thinking I need to be Captain Kurtz here. I've broken the Chain of Command from the Voat ball busters, and if they want me, they gotta come boating up this meekong delta river to fukkn GET me.
Now thats a wiser long term strategy but it shames me that I cant get out there swinging in support of Crensch - I'd appreciate some of you cats getting on out there
I don't think I support this post. I don't know that Alt and I don't want other people in the crossfire. I'm not a leader. I'm not really one of the Q people.
I will fight for them and win this all on my own. They can make their voices heard, or they can sit back and enjoy the show. The only thing I wanted was for them to support you or others that were trying to fight for them.
I'm making my own moves and countermoves and would consider something like this more of a burden than an asset. Most of these folks are, quite frankly, unequipped to deal with this.
Not a single one of them needs to support me or follow me.
I've flaired the 2 v/ProtectVoat posts attempting to capitalize on this submission as "possible misinfo", in line with the "possible disinformation" flair this submission now has.
Edit 1: was a fix from "possible disinfo" to "possible disinformation"
Edit 2:
No, zyklon, you can try to spin my intent all you like, but if Rott's "concerns" were "legit", I'd be very fucking surprised. Moreover, my concern that the submission author was creating drama for Rott (or whomever in your camp) to, himself, spin as Crensch being behind the post is definitely legitimate and stands to reason far more than Rott's.
Posted automatically (#44797) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
Posted automatically (#44675) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
I've flaired the one linking to this thread Resolved since I saw this was deleted. I did see your original tag there previously but when I tagged it there was no tag at all.
Honestly it's a pretty straight forward parody post to poke fun at both GA members and the Q movement. It also serves to push the narrative from protect voat regarding @Crensch, mocking him as some kind of out of control power mod. It's a perfect invitation to all the shitposters who want to sabotage this thread to flood right back in, get banned then bitch to PV that "see @crensch is out of control the GA members declared open warfare us! What else were we to do?. According to our subverse rules this post should be banned on 3 counts, but some Mods here have given it credibility which is unfortunate.
and @Crensch's statement sums up the heart of the matter as to why this is a really bad plan even if it were a good idea (it isn't)
Most of these folks are, quite frankly, unequipped to deal with this.
The post breaks 3 rules. It also serves to bait @Crensch into banning which he didn't do, instead he gave his thoughts about the subject in the post along with other mods here who commented. If someone is going to ban because it breaks the rules (yes it does), then perhaps one the other Mods should just do it as they aren't being targeted by a concerted campaign in other parts of Voat.
view the rest of the comments →
MolochHunter ago
lol
great post. The lion anecdote was awesome
I wanna tell everyone reading this that there's 2 ways to go. You can get out there and stand by @Cresnsch and slug it out against the jackal pack, or you can take all the assholes on that list and block user to starve them of oxygen
As for me, well. I'm thinking for the LONGEVITY of this subverse I probably need to maintain what ive been doing - and thats to limit my Voat participation beyond this subverse
A large part of Srayzie and Shizy's vulnerability resulted from them fighting battles in other subverses
I'm thinking I need to be Captain Kurtz here. I've broken the Chain of Command from the Voat ball busters, and if they want me, they gotta come boating up this meekong delta river to fukkn GET me.
Now thats a wiser long term strategy but it shames me that I cant get out there swinging in support of Crensch - I'd appreciate some of you cats getting on out there
Apologies Mr @Crensch
I hope you dont think lesser of me
great post Mr @shit_alt_lmao , you cheeky 10 day old account, you. Im sure I know you as some other user, somewhere, somehow
Crensch ago
I don't think I support this post. I don't know that Alt and I don't want other people in the crossfire. I'm not a leader. I'm not really one of the Q people.
I will fight for them and win this all on my own. They can make their voices heard, or they can sit back and enjoy the show. The only thing I wanted was for them to support you or others that were trying to fight for them.
I'm making my own moves and countermoves and would consider something like this more of a burden than an asset. Most of these folks are, quite frankly, unequipped to deal with this.
Not a single one of them needs to support me or follow me.
I think this submission is a troll.
Caveman_in_a_suit ago
You're a good and decent human being.
Crensch ago
Cheers, bud.
argosciv ago
I've flaired the 2 v/ProtectVoat posts attempting to capitalize on this submission as "possible misinfo", in line with the "possible disinformation" flair this submission now has.
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3253743/
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3253901/
@Vindicator @MolochHunter @bopper @kestrel9
Edit 1: was a fix from "possible disinfo" to "possible disinformation"
Edit 2:
No, zyklon, you can try to spin my intent all you like, but if Rott's "concerns" were "legit", I'd be very fucking surprised. Moreover, my concern that the submission author was creating drama for Rott (or whomever in your camp) to, himself, spin as Crensch being behind the post is definitely legitimate and stands to reason far more than Rott's.
I'm also not the only one who smelled bullshit from the OP.
All 3 submissions deserve to be flaired appropriately on the grounds of what appears to be manufactured drama.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/SoapboxBanhammer submission by @zyklon_b.
Posted automatically (#44797) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @zyklon_b.
Posted automatically (#44675) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
Dismember ago
I've flaired the one linking to this thread
Resolvedsince I saw this was deleted. I did see your original tag there previously but when I tagged it there was no tag at all.argosciv ago
There's sometimes a mild delay on flairs and distinguishing comments.
Dismember ago
Yea just thought I'd make it clear in case you were wondering if someone removed it.
argosciv ago
No worries.
I still think it should be "possible misinfo", but not bothered by the change.
kestrel9 ago
https://voat.co/v/SoapboxBanhammer/3253809
Vindicator ago
Wise
Crensch ago
If it was just some user that wanted to help, I appreciate the fire and the prose.
I think it is a little misguided and I'm happy to work with you on your main account to figure out what you can do that will help.
virge ago
A wise man picks his own battles when he is sure of his decision and does not let others choose his uninformed position for him.
argosciv ago
Ditto.
Something stinks.
Could be wrong, but, gut says "the fuck is this? me no likey"
argosciv ago
@Crensch @Vindicator @MolochHunter @bopper
See edit to above, included link and hover popup.
bopper ago
Gotcha, thanks ... yeah at this time maybe discretion is the better part of valor.
"We're not retreating, we're just advancing in a different direction."
kestrel9 ago
double ditto
Honestly it's a pretty straight forward parody post to poke fun at both GA members and the Q movement. It also serves to push the narrative from protect voat regarding @Crensch, mocking him as some kind of out of control power mod. It's a perfect invitation to all the shitposters who want to sabotage this thread to flood right back in, get banned then bitch to PV that "see @crensch is out of control the GA members declared open warfare us! What else were we to do?. According to our subverse rules this post should be banned on 3 counts, but some Mods here have given it credibility which is unfortunate.
and @Crensch's statement sums up the heart of the matter as to why this is a really bad plan even if it were a good idea (it isn't)
Crensch ago
I don't blame anyone for being lulled into this. We all let our guard down from time to time.
bopper ago
Exactly.
argosciv ago
Yep, see the change I just made to my comment and follow the link.
kestrel9 ago
yes thanks, good link.
Crensch ago
@bopper @heygeorge
bopper ago
Thanks Crensch! I had also pinged Vindicator.
If you think the gist of what the person is doing will do more harm than good then maybe remove the post?
You're right, most users here just don't have the time and are not equipped - it will come in time.
kestrel9 ago
The post breaks 3 rules. It also serves to bait @Crensch into banning which he didn't do, instead he gave his thoughts about the subject in the post along with other mods here who commented. If someone is going to ban because it breaks the rules (yes it does), then perhaps one the other Mods should just do it as they aren't being targeted by a concerted campaign in other parts of Voat.
Vindicator ago
Wise, K9
bopper ago
Good thoughts, agreed.