I like how "Flat Earthers" "UFO-ologists" "trans-dimensional beings running gov" pepper the three Q boards to DISCREDIT using paid kook shills to muddy up the three voat Q boards :
"Jews > ovens" has been a thing here for like, 4 years. I don't agree with killing every anything, but niggers are begging for "reparations for slavery" and a rave war, and they commit over half the murders in this country, so yea the feral ones need to be addressed and hopefully the rest can be shipped back to sender. Antifa in the US is just beta males, nobody actually cares about them, they're chopping their dicks off at record speed, that problem handles itself.
Oooo. Tough guy.
I notice most shills are aggressive self righteous pricks who try to bully normies into backing down/questioning themselves whenever questioned about ridiculous bullshit.
Got news for you mate, ain't nobody here willing to cow, even the normies are growing a brain, so get it while you can you slimey worm.
REMINDER : In the USA there are only 22 or so legal exemptions to unfettered free speech. And one of them is NOT "murderous intent".
A US citizen can type anything legally containing phrases of so-called "murderous intent" under several CLEAR US supreme court famous rulings, unless :
1 : it has a time period LESS than 1 year in future and the time is stated
and also (mandatory) :
2: the words contain a target or SUBSET of targets of a class.
ALL jews is not a subset
ALL antifa that wear masks is NOT a subset of a class, it is the whole class
"kill every nigger" lacks bot "1" and lacks "2" and is doubly not a "imminent threat of unlawful action"
"violence" is not a concept under SCOTUS, nor is the phrase "murderous intent" under SCOTUS, the phrase you need to research is a call for "imminent unlawful action".
If someone here wants to suppress free speech that SEEMS like they are trying to "suppress murderous intent", then such words they want to suppress need to be illegal on USA soil and meet the "imminent" concept of a stated time of the event, and meet the subclass (BOTH, not either, BOTH parts).
NOTE" There is a limit on free speech if you are calling a person on the phone , or threatening them in person, with an implied threat, but the internet does NOT count as a focused delivery mechanism and cannot be swayed in that direction as it is not "covert" speech. So repeatedly telephoning a SPECIFIC single negro and saying "you will die from a knife in your throat" can be a "death threat" and a "death threat" is a form of illegal speech. Internet posts in public are not for that case.
view the rest of the comments →
zit ago
I like how "Flat Earthers" "UFO-ologists" "trans-dimensional beings running gov" pepper the three Q boards to DISCREDIT using paid kook shills to muddy up the three voat Q boards :
v/GreatAwakening
v/QRV
v/theawakening
I am sure the "psycho babble" is a similar tactic called "NOISE RATIO"
As in ruin the subs with flooding of poor Signal to Noise ratio.
DANKGHIDORAHMKII ago
"Jews > ovens" has been a thing here for like, 4 years. I don't agree with killing every anything, but niggers are begging for "reparations for slavery" and a rave war, and they commit over half the murders in this country, so yea the feral ones need to be addressed and hopefully the rest can be shipped back to sender. Antifa in the US is just beta males, nobody actually cares about them, they're chopping their dicks off at record speed, that problem handles itself.
ammonthenephite ago
A great example of exactly what OP is talking about.
DANKGHIDORAHMKII ago
/u/dankghidorah I've been here awhile. Got banned for downvoting a user who constantly made calls for violence. Any points now?
magamoo ago
Oooo. Tough guy. I notice most shills are aggressive self righteous pricks who try to bully normies into backing down/questioning themselves whenever questioned about ridiculous bullshit.
Got news for you mate, ain't nobody here willing to cow, even the normies are growing a brain, so get it while you can you slimey worm.
DANKGHIDORAHMKII ago
That's your response to someone who tried to suppress murderous intent? Okay.
zit ago
@magamoo, and @DANKGHIDORAHMKII
REMINDER : In the USA there are only 22 or so legal exemptions to unfettered free speech. And one of them is NOT "murderous intent".
A US citizen can type anything legally containing phrases of so-called "murderous intent" under several CLEAR US supreme court famous rulings, unless :
1 : it has a time period LESS than 1 year in future and the time is stated and also (mandatory) :
2: the words contain a target or SUBSET of targets of a class.
ALL jews is not a subset
ALL antifa that wear masks is NOT a subset of a class, it is the whole class
"kill every nigger" lacks bot "1" and lacks "2" and is doubly not a "imminent threat of unlawful action"
"violence" is not a concept under SCOTUS, nor is the phrase "murderous intent" under SCOTUS, the phrase you need to research is a call for "imminent unlawful action".
If someone here wants to suppress free speech that SEEMS like they are trying to "suppress murderous intent", then such words they want to suppress need to be illegal on USA soil and meet the "imminent" concept of a stated time of the event, and meet the subclass (BOTH, not either, BOTH parts).
This is US free speech law basics.
DANKGHIDORAHMKII ago
Neat, TIL. Thanks for the info.
zit ago
NOTE" There is a limit on free speech if you are calling a person on the phone , or threatening them in person, with an implied threat, but the internet does NOT count as a focused delivery mechanism and cannot be swayed in that direction as it is not "covert" speech. So repeatedly telephoning a SPECIFIC single negro and saying "you will die from a knife in your throat" can be a "death threat" and a "death threat" is a form of illegal speech. Internet posts in public are not for that case.
DANKGHIDORAHMKII ago
I wish I knew all the things I need to know like this :/