Yes, WoS, you can't just dump massive piles of links and pics of links into a submission and claim it's a great post. We've been spammed with similar long, link-riddled posts from the earliest days of the sub compliments of David Brock, designed to lead researchers down dead end rabbit holes. You need to put together a coherent piece that ties all of it's links together, explaining what each one is and how it connects. That's what the v/pizzagate ruleset is about. There are a million other subverses on Voat you can dump your hoard of data into.
I claim it is the longest and most complete ever posted in the subverse. I would be curious if you had a better example. It still doesn't include everything. Silsby... etc.
I posted it because I was asked to, even though I knew it was going to be a headache.
As far as a "great post" I absolutely didn't want to include triplicate ways to view the same material. For that reason, it is a bit of a headache, but the rules are what make it appear hectic, because I have to explain every single link not just the three times they are all already explained, but again inside the post.
It is an architectural problem.
So, if I wanted to put something nice together, what would you recommend?
So, if I wanted to put something nice together, what would you recommend?
Respect the limitations of the medium. Make focused, individual submissions, and crosslink them where relevant to other focused, individual submissions. How is it that everyone else who posts seems willing and able to do this, except you?
Here's the thing, in the timing surrounding your shitty response, my website was attacked.
What do you really think I am after? I am after determining if /v/Pizzagate is operating as a limited hangout. The format is designed intentionally to operate as such and you may just be a pawn, but your recent interactions have raised some serious concerns. Because you raise the possibility you are a shill covering for a criminal conspiracy, I have archived everything I could on you on the Internet and I will be comparing it to my logs.
So, you accused me of being a shill, but I have a little mini RICO database of shills that I will "thot audit." I have a couple of lawyers going over what I've got and a computer science professor from the UC system to provide expert insight.
Am I going to find an IP in my logs that connects your Twitter geolocation tags?
Maybe. Maybe not. You are but one.
Do you understand where I am really coming from?
I've been providing /v/Pizzagate with honesty traps for two years and they always fail.
You made up a completely false interpretation of the spam rules to target my content. That doesn't sit well with me.
Seriously. Do I need to thot audit you? If you don't provide me with some kind of explanation of your behavior, you go straight to the top of the list past the /r/politics mods. I'm not kidding around.
do you really think that any limitations of this platform and medium were authored by the same people who came here years later to start the pizzagate sub in the wake of Podesta's wikileaks ?
i mean, ive got a pretty high tinfoil hat threshold, but that breaches it
I am not following your question. Rephrase, maybe?
I posted a thread that I expected to have a high level of contention surrounding it. However, I made a previous post with almost the same exact information, that was marked "share this". Literally cut and [pasted from the same article with less sources.
So, I set an honesty trap and I even messaged Vindicator that I would be on my best behavior. That is why his vitriol surprised me. I have zero problem if he wants to share a screenshot of that message. I generally prefer to keep everything out in the open.
My thesis, which I required the help of two non-pizzagaters to uncover (they do not believe in it, at all), is that a person used a CACI company device to visit the pizzagate thread, then came to the site and started low level attacks from their own device, before moving onto a series of more sophisticated atrtacks.
This company is under the umbrella of George Tenet and contracts with the Defense Intelligence Agency. This means a literal spy, using company infrastructure (probably due to laziness) to visit Voat, then visited my site, then started the attacks.
This happened within minutes of a contentious exchange where I remained polite.
The difference between the post marked "Share This" and the one now marked "Possible Disinformation" despite me fixing it according to Vindicator's instructions, is the exposure of Robert Mueller as a black hat.
a person used a CACI company device to visit the pizzagate thread, then came to the site and started low level attacks from their own device, before moving onto a series of more sophisticated atrtacks.
thats an allegtion of a user that is a shill or deep state operative
thats a separate allegation to 'voat is compromised' Compromised infers the moderators or even site coders are deep state or working with/for them
where is your evidence proving any connection between your shill activity and the moderators / coders of voat ?
if you dont have anything really solid, then you deserve all the heat you get from Moderators whose integrity you have challenged
Are you making an accusation? Because that is exactly what you are trying to criticize me of doing, right?
I've explained my set up many times. I've been 100% consistent across my three years posting as Web of Slime and all of this criticism is being generated and everyone keeps steering the conversation away from the best way to present the evidence.
this sub is for pizzagate research, or hadnt you noticed
the moderators spend thankless hours trying to keep this board user friendly to genuine people - which, by the above stated motivation - you arent
your not committed to pizzagate research or awareness. You stated yourself your vested interest is a derivative function of our purpose- ergo you are a corrupt influence
I RARELY post to /v/Pizzagate. I was ASKED to post the last post. Otherwise, I don't bother.
I find your response curious. Don't you guys think you should have a spreadsheet of evidence in the side bar? A list of confirmed high level DEmocrat pedophiles? I'm not sure what you are doing to raise awareness, but I imagine my Pizzagate output far surpasses yours, in numbers of impressions. My twitter, alone, has like 150k impressions per month. My post on /v/PIzzagate? Like 200.
So, you accuse me of not wanting to raise awareness, but... honest question... do you know what your numbers are?
the issue is you pissing on the backs of the moderators here insinuating they are compromised
Someone is compromised.
I'm not bitching about getting stung.
I explained, from the beginning, that I was setting an honesty trap, and they still fell for and still got caught lying and my site still got attacked.
I'm actually perfectly calm about the whole thing and using the opportunity to learn about my attackers.
Which fact are you suggesting I made up? I see that you're emotional. The list is a group of shills out of a DIA contractor. I just thought the first password might suggest, to you, that THAT particular shill was aimed at Voat... "goatblower"
You can learn about people by their passwords. You can learn about organizational structures by their emails.
If you sort /v/thewebofslime by new... you can see where a lot of this is coming from. I understand that it is hard without context to not be able to see from where I am coming from.
view the rest of the comments →
thewebofslime ago
They already put a 24 hour warning for deletion due to lack of "clarity" despite being the longest, most well sourced post in the sub's history.
Vindicator ago
Yes, WoS, you can't just dump massive piles of links and pics of links into a submission and claim it's a great post. We've been spammed with similar long, link-riddled posts from the earliest days of the sub compliments of David Brock, designed to lead researchers down dead end rabbit holes. You need to put together a coherent piece that ties all of it's links together, explaining what each one is and how it connects. That's what the v/pizzagate ruleset is about. There are a million other subverses on Voat you can dump your hoard of data into.
thewebofslime ago
I don't claim it is great.
I claim it is the longest and most complete ever posted in the subverse. I would be curious if you had a better example. It still doesn't include everything. Silsby... etc.
I posted it because I was asked to, even though I knew it was going to be a headache.
As far as a "great post" I absolutely didn't want to include triplicate ways to view the same material. For that reason, it is a bit of a headache, but the rules are what make it appear hectic, because I have to explain every single link not just the three times they are all already explained, but again inside the post.
It is an architectural problem.
So, if I wanted to put something nice together, what would you recommend?
Vindicator ago
Respect the limitations of the medium. Make focused, individual submissions, and crosslink them where relevant to other focused, individual submissions. How is it that everyone else who posts seems willing and able to do this, except you?
thewebofslime ago
I edited the post three times. I'm trying.
Here's the thing, in the timing surrounding your shitty response, my website was attacked.
What do you really think I am after? I am after determining if /v/Pizzagate is operating as a limited hangout. The format is designed intentionally to operate as such and you may just be a pawn, but your recent interactions have raised some serious concerns. Because you raise the possibility you are a shill covering for a criminal conspiracy, I have archived everything I could on you on the Internet and I will be comparing it to my logs.
So, you accused me of being a shill, but I have a little mini RICO database of shills that I will "thot audit." I have a couple of lawyers going over what I've got and a computer science professor from the UC system to provide expert insight.
Am I going to find an IP in my logs that connects your Twitter geolocation tags?
Maybe. Maybe not. You are but one.
Do you understand where I am really coming from?
I've been providing /v/Pizzagate with honesty traps for two years and they always fail.
You made up a completely false interpretation of the spam rules to target my content. That doesn't sit well with me.
Seriously. Do I need to thot audit you? If you don't provide me with some kind of explanation of your behavior, you go straight to the top of the list past the /r/politics mods. I'm not kidding around.
MolochHunter ago
do you really think that any limitations of this platform and medium were authored by the same people who came here years later to start the pizzagate sub in the wake of Podesta's wikileaks ?
i mean, ive got a pretty high tinfoil hat threshold, but that breaches it
thewebofslime ago
I am not following your question. Rephrase, maybe?
I posted a thread that I expected to have a high level of contention surrounding it. However, I made a previous post with almost the same exact information, that was marked "share this". Literally cut and [pasted from the same article with less sources.
So, I set an honesty trap and I even messaged Vindicator that I would be on my best behavior. That is why his vitriol surprised me. I have zero problem if he wants to share a screenshot of that message. I generally prefer to keep everything out in the open.
My thesis, which I required the help of two non-pizzagaters to uncover (they do not believe in it, at all), is that a person used a CACI company device to visit the pizzagate thread, then came to the site and started low level attacks from their own device, before moving onto a series of more sophisticated atrtacks.
This company is under the umbrella of George Tenet and contracts with the Defense Intelligence Agency. This means a literal spy, using company infrastructure (probably due to laziness) to visit Voat, then visited my site, then started the attacks.
This happened within minutes of a contentious exchange where I remained polite.
The difference between the post marked "Share This" and the one now marked "Possible Disinformation" despite me fixing it according to Vindicator's instructions, is the exposure of Robert Mueller as a black hat.
Does that make sense?
MolochHunter ago
thats an allegtion of a user that is a shill or deep state operative
thats a separate allegation to 'voat is compromised' Compromised infers the moderators or even site coders are deep state or working with/for them
where is your evidence proving any connection between your shill activity and the moderators / coders of voat ?
if you dont have anything really solid, then you deserve all the heat you get from Moderators whose integrity you have challenged
thewebofslime ago
I am confident that what I have is solid.
MolochHunter ago
thats an answer that condemns you
put the fuck up or shut the fuck up - dont tell me you dont already know that
@Vindicator i reckon you should just put a shill sticky on this user
he's making allegations against moderators being compromised but ducks and weaves when asked to substantiate them
thewebofslime ago
It takes time to formulate a response when I have hundreds of inbox messages across a variety of places.
Again, I started out polite, told everyone I was setting an honesty trap, then it sprung and I found something more than what I was looking for.
I have no problem laying out the evidence and I have slowly been doing it. But, I need help and I am getting it.
Thus far, what I have is pretty definitive.
I'm happy to explain it, but I see that a lot of people are very emotional.
But you have to realize that is nothing new for me.
Either way, I will present what I have because it is of greater significance than what I was looking for.
It will certainly anger a lot of people. This, I know. But, I'm not running a popularity contest.
MolochHunter ago
kinda sounds like you run an awful lot off accounts under different personas
thewebofslime ago
Yes. I measure artificial impressions as a way to monitor shills and make investments.
Politics and corruption is just a hobby. I monitor many, many subjects where I compartmentalize. Music. Stock market. Uranium. Gold. etc.
WoS is also comprised of many accounts:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/webofslime
Gab: https://gab.ai/thewebofslime
Minds: https://www.minds.com/thewebofslime
Voat: https://voat.co/v/thewebofslime
Saidit: https://saidit.net/s/TheWebOfSlime/
Imgur: https://thewebofslime.imgur.com/
Steemit: https://steemit.com/@webofslime
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/web.of.slime/
Are you making an accusation? Because that is exactly what you are trying to criticize me of doing, right?
I've explained my set up many times. I've been 100% consistent across my three years posting as Web of Slime and all of this criticism is being generated and everyone keeps steering the conversation away from the best way to present the evidence.
MolochHunter ago
go earn your money elsewhere, asshole
this sub is for pizzagate research, or hadnt you noticed
the moderators spend thankless hours trying to keep this board user friendly to genuine people - which, by the above stated motivation - you arent
your not committed to pizzagate research or awareness. You stated yourself your vested interest is a derivative function of our purpose- ergo you are a corrupt influence
thewebofslime ago
I RARELY post to /v/Pizzagate. I was ASKED to post the last post. Otherwise, I don't bother.
I find your response curious. Don't you guys think you should have a spreadsheet of evidence in the side bar? A list of confirmed high level DEmocrat pedophiles? I'm not sure what you are doing to raise awareness, but I imagine my Pizzagate output far surpasses yours, in numbers of impressions. My twitter, alone, has like 150k impressions per month. My post on /v/PIzzagate? Like 200.
So, you accuse me of not wanting to raise awareness, but... honest question... do you know what your numbers are?
MolochHunter ago
the issue is not raising awareness
the issue is you pissing on the backs of the moderators here insinuating they are compromised
then you dont stump up the evidence when asked
you kick a hornets nest then bitch about getting stung ? you must have been educated by cultural marxists
thewebofslime ago
Someone is compromised.
I'm not bitching about getting stung.
I explained, from the beginning, that I was setting an honesty trap, and they still fell for and still got caught lying and my site still got attacked.
I'm actually perfectly calm about the whole thing and using the opportunity to learn about my attackers.
abramah@qinetiq.com goatblower
abwebb@qinetiq.com trolling
anitakhan@qinetiq.com babydoll
anneso1980@qinetiq.com babydoux
arthomson@qinetiq.com thematrix
babe_of_slytherin@qinetiq.com scorpio
c_calvo@qinetiq.com 69tuchita6985
cjsaunders@taz.qinetiq.com rudem00d
djwoodsford@qinetiq.com picojode
efitzpatrick@qinetiq.com Empire
ejackroyd@qinetiq.com Peachfield1
gjclarkson@qinetiq.com PhantomF4J
jakohler@qinetiq.com unicorns
jerry.brinson@qinetiq-na.com iamking357
john.young@qinetiq-na.com 4076911_NyJy
jsayer@qinetiq.com dad1234
larmstrong@qinetiq.com dogsoldiers
lauria.clarke@qinetiq-na.com Tugb0at1
loneill@qinetiq.com gobble!
lwood@qinetiq.com biscuit
mahawthorne@qinetiq.com stargate
mark.hewitt@qinetiq-na.com wunderkind
mataylor1@qinetiq.com lemon73
matthew.anglin@qinetiq-na.com hogdog
mgwestlake@qinetiq.com stegosaur
Michael.Wisloski@qinetiq-na.com catdog
mpmould@qinetiq.com MPMtopologyMPM
ncedouard@qinetiqrail.com bishop
nick.williams@qinetiq.com Jellybaby1
pbadams@qinetiq.com agentorange
pdovey@taz.qinetiq.com gothic1
phardman@qinetiq.com electrolube
pstanner@qinetiq.com tigercub
sdugelay@qinetiq.com lollipop01
tdsorokopud@qinetiq.com Maxdomcarmen1
wychan@qinetiq.com montanaismyname
znullova@qinetiq.com 7955265186z
MolochHunter ago
what the fuck do i want with that list?
this is what i think is happening
you spin webs of you own making
then YOU get tangled up in them
then others say 'WTF are you doing' ?
and you take that as evidence that THEY, and not you, spout web strands out your anus
seek a second opinion on your meds is my advice
thewebofslime ago
Out of curiosity... what benefit do you get from constantly being insulting?
I've shut down a few of your arguments already and you're just looking for a reason to hate, rather than to understand.
Won't your life be better FOR YOU, if you weren't so crotchety?
I get it.. I delve in sometimes... but just to determine intent. Otherwise, you're kinda wasting your time.
Especially... if you are interested in helping get the truth out.
thewebofslime ago
Which fact are you suggesting I made up? I see that you're emotional. The list is a group of shills out of a DIA contractor. I just thought the first password might suggest, to you, that THAT particular shill was aimed at Voat... "goatblower"
You can learn about people by their passwords. You can learn about organizational structures by their emails.
If you sort /v/thewebofslime by new... you can see where a lot of this is coming from. I understand that it is hard without context to not be able to see from where I am coming from.