Yes, WoS, you can't just dump massive piles of links and pics of links into a submission and claim it's a great post. We've been spammed with similar long, link-riddled posts from the earliest days of the sub compliments of David Brock, designed to lead researchers down dead end rabbit holes. You need to put together a coherent piece that ties all of it's links together, explaining what each one is and how it connects. That's what the v/pizzagate ruleset is about. There are a million other subverses on Voat you can dump your hoard of data into.
I claim it is the longest and most complete ever posted in the subverse. I would be curious if you had a better example. It still doesn't include everything. Silsby... etc.
I posted it because I was asked to, even though I knew it was going to be a headache.
As far as a "great post" I absolutely didn't want to include triplicate ways to view the same material. For that reason, it is a bit of a headache, but the rules are what make it appear hectic, because I have to explain every single link not just the three times they are all already explained, but again inside the post.
It is an architectural problem.
So, if I wanted to put something nice together, what would you recommend?
So, if I wanted to put something nice together, what would you recommend?
Respect the limitations of the medium. Make focused, individual submissions, and crosslink them where relevant to other focused, individual submissions. How is it that everyone else who posts seems willing and able to do this, except you?
Here's the thing, in the timing surrounding your shitty response, my website was attacked.
What do you really think I am after? I am after determining if /v/Pizzagate is operating as a limited hangout. The format is designed intentionally to operate as such and you may just be a pawn, but your recent interactions have raised some serious concerns. Because you raise the possibility you are a shill covering for a criminal conspiracy, I have archived everything I could on you on the Internet and I will be comparing it to my logs.
So, you accused me of being a shill, but I have a little mini RICO database of shills that I will "thot audit." I have a couple of lawyers going over what I've got and a computer science professor from the UC system to provide expert insight.
Am I going to find an IP in my logs that connects your Twitter geolocation tags?
Maybe. Maybe not. You are but one.
Do you understand where I am really coming from?
I've been providing /v/Pizzagate with honesty traps for two years and they always fail.
You made up a completely false interpretation of the spam rules to target my content. That doesn't sit well with me.
Seriously. Do I need to thot audit you? If you don't provide me with some kind of explanation of your behavior, you go straight to the top of the list past the /r/politics mods. I'm not kidding around.
Interestingly, this "hacking" he appears to be accusing me of is the same type of BS Jem777 claimed -- that I had doxed her through her IP and sent thugs to her house to beat her up.
The person who had the bad interaction also accused me of being a David Brock shill... you know how realistic that accusation is. I consider it "projection."
I feel like I have something real, but I am having someone who knows a lot more than me go over it.
At this stage, @Vindicator acted inappropriately, which is a sudden change in his behavior, made wild accusations, made up fake interpretations of rules, which coincided with the beginning of low level attacks from not so hidden locations. Then, the attacks became more sophisticated and widespread.
It is a very strange coincidence that these two interactions started within minutes of each other.
If you give me a minute to respond, I will address it in the correct thread. Right now, you are hitting me up in three different threads when I made a single one to hash this out.
view the rest of the comments →
thewebofslime ago
They already put a 24 hour warning for deletion due to lack of "clarity" despite being the longest, most well sourced post in the sub's history.
Vindicator ago
Yes, WoS, you can't just dump massive piles of links and pics of links into a submission and claim it's a great post. We've been spammed with similar long, link-riddled posts from the earliest days of the sub compliments of David Brock, designed to lead researchers down dead end rabbit holes. You need to put together a coherent piece that ties all of it's links together, explaining what each one is and how it connects. That's what the v/pizzagate ruleset is about. There are a million other subverses on Voat you can dump your hoard of data into.
thewebofslime ago
I don't claim it is great.
I claim it is the longest and most complete ever posted in the subverse. I would be curious if you had a better example. It still doesn't include everything. Silsby... etc.
I posted it because I was asked to, even though I knew it was going to be a headache.
As far as a "great post" I absolutely didn't want to include triplicate ways to view the same material. For that reason, it is a bit of a headache, but the rules are what make it appear hectic, because I have to explain every single link not just the three times they are all already explained, but again inside the post.
It is an architectural problem.
So, if I wanted to put something nice together, what would you recommend?
Vindicator ago
Respect the limitations of the medium. Make focused, individual submissions, and crosslink them where relevant to other focused, individual submissions. How is it that everyone else who posts seems willing and able to do this, except you?
thewebofslime ago
I edited the post three times. I'm trying.
Here's the thing, in the timing surrounding your shitty response, my website was attacked.
What do you really think I am after? I am after determining if /v/Pizzagate is operating as a limited hangout. The format is designed intentionally to operate as such and you may just be a pawn, but your recent interactions have raised some serious concerns. Because you raise the possibility you are a shill covering for a criminal conspiracy, I have archived everything I could on you on the Internet and I will be comparing it to my logs.
So, you accused me of being a shill, but I have a little mini RICO database of shills that I will "thot audit." I have a couple of lawyers going over what I've got and a computer science professor from the UC system to provide expert insight.
Am I going to find an IP in my logs that connects your Twitter geolocation tags?
Maybe. Maybe not. You are but one.
Do you understand where I am really coming from?
I've been providing /v/Pizzagate with honesty traps for two years and they always fail.
You made up a completely false interpretation of the spam rules to target my content. That doesn't sit well with me.
Seriously. Do I need to thot audit you? If you don't provide me with some kind of explanation of your behavior, you go straight to the top of the list past the /r/politics mods. I'm not kidding around.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
WTF is going on. Are you the one who has 'botted' me?
I know you've had trouble submitting, but do you really think that @Vindicator is responsible for the tech problems you are experiencing?
@MadWorld
Vindicator ago
Interestingly, this "hacking" he appears to be accusing me of is the same type of BS Jem777 claimed -- that I had doxed her through her IP and sent thugs to her house to beat her up.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I sincerely hope not. I tend to believe that someone could want to mess with @thewebofslime, more than I would ever believe anything from Jem777
I do not approve of issuing threats to PG mods. Especially without proof of suspicions.
@MadWorld
thewebofslime ago
The timing is what alerted me.
Matching locations are what alerted me.
The person who had the bad interaction also accused me of being a David Brock shill... you know how realistic that accusation is. I consider it "projection."
I feel like I have something real, but I am having someone who knows a lot more than me go over it.
At this stage, @Vindicator acted inappropriately, which is a sudden change in his behavior, made wild accusations, made up fake interpretations of rules, which coincided with the beginning of low level attacks from not so hidden locations. Then, the attacks became more sophisticated and widespread.
It is a very strange coincidence that these two interactions started within minutes of each other.
Vindicator ago
Links to evidence of ANY of these things, or you are full of shit.
thewebofslime ago
If you give me a minute to respond, I will address it in the correct thread. Right now, you are hitting me up in three different threads when I made a single one to hash this out.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Go ahead and take this discussion to your submission.
Please ping the PG Mods to your responses there.
Ping me too please if you wouldn't mind.
thewebofslime ago
Sounds good.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Thank you.