that vertical fish is one of the nazi symbols (less common than the swasticker, sure), and 14 is the white supremacist number

Interesting! Do we have a source for this @MolochHunter?

This is clearly nazi symbolism, it has nothing to do with Podesta's fish. So why is Q spreading disinfo? That's annoying.

Is it "disinfo"? Or is it a hardcore leak of highly classified historical information?

Q has in the past asserted that Nazism is a creation of the globalist Cabal. Check out his drops from March 10, 2017, #928 - #941. In #936 after dropping a pic of German Cardinals giving the Nazi salute with Nazis, he says

"The Nazi order. NWO [N does not refer to “New”]."

In #937, after anons start crapping their pants over the thought the Nazis might have actually won WWII, he says:

GLIMPSE. You cannot possibly imagine the size of this. Trust the plan. Trust there are more good than bad. The WORLD is helping. We are not alone. We are all connected in this fight. PATRIOTS UNITE.

In #938 he clarifies:

"N does not refer to Nazi. The continued Nazi ideology is relevant. Events will clarify. Think subgroup."

Before dismissing the 14 Fish post out of hand, it would be prudent to take a serious look at what Q is saying, in context.

He's been nudging anons to investigate Merkel's family history since the very beginning. In #142 on November 12, 2017 (two weeks after his first drop), he lays the whole cabal structure out and connects it to globalist financial hegemony via central banking. It's a long post. He says,

"What happened during WWII? Was Hitler a puppet? Who was his handler? What was the purpose? What was the real purpose of the war? What age was GS? What is the Soros family history? What has occurred since the fall of N Germany? Who is A. Merkel? What is A. Merkel’s family history? Follow the bloodline. Who died on the Titanic? What year did the Titanic sink? Why is this relevant?"

He has also repeatedly pointed anons to Operation Mockingbird (11 mentions, starting from his very first day) asserting that worldwide mainstream media is controlled by the Cabal. Anyone with knowledge of Operation Paperclip has to wonder if they are using propaganda techniques perfected in Nazi Germany.

The March 10 Merkel drops are interesting from another standpoint, as well. They show Q leaking these clues to directly screw with Merkel. Is he threatening to reveal more information if she doesn't do something? Sure sounds like it:

In #930, he says "POTUS’ recent Tweet relevant here. EU. Enough is enough. She was warned." And in #931 "10 to comply. Choice is yours. Q+"

The tweet referenced is probably* this one:

"The European Union, wonderful countries who treat the U.S. very badly on trade, are complaining about the tariffs on Steel & Aluminum. If they drop their horrific barriers & tariffs on U.S. products going in, we will likewise drop ours. Big Deficit. If not, we Tax Cars etc. FAIR!"

^{*Note: The tweet noted as associated with this drop by qmap.pub is different and makes no sense, which is curious. ALWAYS check primary sources, in this case, the Trump tweet archive.}

Two days prior, he put a big tariff on aluminum imports from the EU due to threats to national security. And tweeted about it.

4.75 hours after Q spelled out the connection between Antifa and the Nazis and Merkel's family history, he noted CNN was airing the JFK assassination footage, implying it was an attempt to trigger MKUltra sleepers to assassinate Trump.

Either he's LARPing here to fool us all, or he's playing a real game of chess with the cabal, using the threat of deploying damaging information to force them to the bargaining table.

How effective would that be, if he were only LARPing? Would the world's most powerful people be afraid of mere confirmation bias among a small fringe group of "conspiratards"?

October 29, Merkel unexpectedly announced she was stepping down in a surprise address.

November 21, the World Trade Organization announced it was "investigating the legality" of Trumps aluminum tariffs, "a decision the U.S. says could undermine the legitimacy of the Geneva-based trade body." Quite a pissing match going on over that, according to Bloomberg, here. Hard to read that and not see worldwide cabal forces armwrestling with Trump. Wikipedia has a good summary about how 100% of the world's economists agreed Trump's trade policy was foolhardy. Sound similar to "scientific consensus" on global warming?

November 23, the New York Times ran an editorial headlined "It's time for Angela Merkel to leave."

As Q is wont to say: "Moves and counter moves."

@srayzie @Blacksmith21