Q made a post that includes a graphic showing that the NZ murderers gun had a 14 and a fish like a Podesta pic, and Podesta was in NZ five days before the shooting.
Graphic
Q said...
What does a dog do when he/she has a bone?
Did he have a therapist?
Who paid for his travel to the Middle East?
Q
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
Even better, the shooter had a magic gun with brass that evaporated before it hit the ground:
https://www.instagram.com/followthewhiterabbit_official/p/BvIBtkRgnFL/
http://archive.is/DN0KL
Courtesy: https://voat.co/v/theawakening/3101846
srayzie ago
So many things are not making sense about that shooting
Blacksmith21 ago
It's another fake flag. Just like watching the Ft. Lauderdale airport shooting. Once you know what to look for, it becomes very obvious.
RainDrops ago
I think you're a bit confused as there is a difference between a false flag attack and a fake attack.
In a false flag attack, there is actually an attack that occurs that is then falsely attributed to an innocent party, group, nation etc. Actual people still die, real devastation occurs.
In a faked attack, the entire event is staged, it never even actually occurs and any so called victims are all part of the drama. No one actually dies but everyone plays a part.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:False_flag_operations
Remember: Problem-Reaction-Solution.
Create a problem, using a false flag terrorist attack, thus engineering an emotional response, such as fear or hatred, from the public. The public then demand that action be taken to solve and/or prevent similar events from occurring in the future. This allows the enactment of the predeterimed solution that was wanted all along.
Blacksmith21 ago
I'm not confused at all. False flag = people dying in an event. Fake flag = 100% faked/staged event (hoax). Hope that clears it up for ya.
RainDrops ago
But people actually died at those mosques in NZ making the attack a false flag.
Blacksmith21 ago
How do you know?
RainDrops ago
How do you not know?
Blacksmith21 ago
I'm not convinced. There are too many inconsistencies in the videos and photos. If you paid attention to the Ft. Lauderdale airport shooting, you'd see all of the same hallmarks as Christchurch - fake blood, people acting oddly in that type of situation, etc. Then there are forensic inconsistencies - like what appears to be prestaged ammo mags and blood spatter analysis which doesn't jive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=31&v=3jFKZaSeNjg
https://gizmodo.com/physicists-are-sciencing-the-shit-out-of-gunshot-blood-1784548597
Bottom line -- A room in which 20-30 pp were shot up against the wall with a 5.56 does NOT, I'll repeat DOES NOT, resemble any crime scene blood spatter analysis I've seen.
Why are you stumping so hard for it to be real versus staged versus fake?
That's called confirmation bias. The only thing I'm doing is assembling known details and they are all falling into the staged column.
@kyjane @vindicator @srayzie (read the article/watch the video)
Vindicator ago
Thanks for the links, Blacksmith.