1southofyou ago

That Q is real is unarguable. I’ve seen the posts. What Q really is, well, that’s another story entirely. Below are the theories I’ve seen proposed in Voat.

Which do you think Q is? And Why? Or add another.

1)larp

2)inner DJT/NSA circle

3)larp coopted by DJT team because of success in mainstreaming pro-trump anti-establishment message

4)psyop or simply one part of DJT overall media strategy

5)psyop to further divide US politically by some ABC agency

6)Jesus or God

7)Democrat party psyop to divide

8)small group of hackers or other computer/web/code gurus

9)coordinated well funded outside of government group psyop or other propagandist type of dissemination of ideology

Qvoater ago

2 🖖

Ponycam ago

jfk jr, for those who believe he's still alive.

1southofyou ago

Thx. Any idea why my comment is down voted? I am asking a serious question. There are plenty of people lurking and posting on here with differing beliefs. I’m just curious as to what they are.

Shizy ago

Any idea why my comment is down voted?

It could be because you are new. Some users see a brand new account and will automatically downvoat as are suspicious of new users and their intentions.

hangry ago

How uncouth of them.

1southofyou ago

Well I was “1southrising” but I accidentally tapped the log off button with my pinky yesterday (forgotten password) and then when I did the - Voat send you link to renew password thing - Voat never sent me anything. So I created a new profile as I had no choice.

I didn’t get this bullshit the first time I was a newbie.

Thanks for the response!

hangry ago

Voat now is a bit jaded from all of the newfag qtards. Expect a little hazing; that means that deep down we really love you. Honest.

Shizy ago

I see. It may be different this go around because of the recent issues we had with a former mod pretending to be a new user and fooling everyone. Hopefully it will stop once people become familiar with your username.

1southofyou ago

A former mod pretending to be a new user?...what happened and why would that happen? Im up on politics but totally out of the loop on that. Not even sure why that matters.? If u have the time could u give me some background?

Shizy ago

It was pretty crazy. Lots of drama. If you're really interested, this post is probably the best to explain what happened:

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2941545

Type-o-negative was the former mod who came back reinvented with an alt.

hangry ago

You need neutral family-friendly lovable fuzzball mods who treat everyone fairly, like me. I nominate myself, in the spirit of goodwill and unity.

Shizy ago

Oh hangry, you're funny! 😂

I do appreciate that you treat everyone fairly. I dont think everyone would agree with that, but you don't go low when disagreeing with people, which is appreciated.

hangry ago

But mah moderator gibs! That would be sooo funny.

hangry ago

Hey, no fair, @DickTick was writing to me, and you don't post my response....so, here goes:

Thanks for your response...a couple of thoughts/clarifications.

I don't buy into the back reading of Q and assigning hopeful meanings to riddles, or the reason the riddles are there in the first place. Real leaders do not do this. The "followers" are role-playing as internet Patriots who are getting super-secret inside info, and giving the info any meaning that they choose to. Yes, yes, the populace is dumbed down, etc., and there is a ring of truth to the explanation, but as the tv show said, "The truth is out there." There is nothing proven in Q derps that cannot be found elsewhere. Proven. By the time something can be verified, or, which is more likely, by the time Qtards read back into the Q derps something that is true, it is true not because of the Q derp, but because it is reported elsewhere. The irony of "there are no coincidences" is exquisite.

I agree that there are people in the middle both left and right, who are not politically-interested, and don't watch or read much news. Some days I wish I was still one of them ha. As to the fringe element of Qtardism, well, don't you think you are weighted a little heavy with those? I mean, you're basically a refuge for them, and the anonymity encourages it. I don't think, and I doubt that you do, that the percentage of batshit crazy posters in your group is as low as other movements on the conservative/libertarian side of things. I think you lead the pack in that area.

As to infiltrators and all of that. I really don't know anything about it, and tend to doubt that there is much of that going on, at least here. It sounds like someone is all self-important in their own mind when they start claiming that there are shills working against them. Really? Someone is paying real money to fuck with you? Gosh, you must be so important! That's the sense I get from that. It gets repeated, and in fact, it used to be the common fallback position when I would comment in this sub. First, you're a shill; then, you're a Clinton Commie Soros Leftist. This sort of nonsense is one of my own proofs that Qtardism is filled with dolts and weak-ass thinkers. Wouldn't it dawn on one of them, just once, that I know they are lying? Dur.

you're still spending an awful lot of time attempting to break our morale and/or disprove a movement that is supposedly nothing more than a fat kid in his mom's basement with a computer.

Three things: 1. I don't spend much time at all at it. My longer posts are in other subs, and to interact with this one is not time-consuming. 2. I haven't characterized Q in the way that you describe. My take is that the Q group is well-financed and professional. And dangerous, not being who you assume that they are. 3. My posts are only designed to flush out the truth. If that is demoralizing to anyone, so be it. I don't need to disprove the movement, it does that all on its own.

Your ending is really nothing more than a sneer, and a bit disappointing since you don't seem like the sneering type. Not the last paragraph, but the one starting with "Just a thought I would share a tiny portion of light on what is obviously a very dark world for you." This is similar in tone to what I noted above about the Qtards that fall back upon calling someone names. I know who/what I am, and am always puzzled when someone opposing me over political views/tactics thinks that by making shit up about me somehow I will either now think of myself that way, or conclude that they must be so much wiser and knowledgeable than I. It is a curious trait, and not effective. This isn't Socratic, is it?

DickTick ago

Also I did my part and upvoted you.. People really need to learn that civil discourse should always be encouraged. That is actually supposed to be a core tenant of this movement. I know it doesn't seem that way sometimes but... yep.

hangry ago

Thank you, kind sir!

DickTick ago

I'm wondering if you will ever admit just how in the dark you really were if and when this all comes out to be true.. and no, I'm not talkin about all of the added bulshit from the community.. I'm talking about the core topics from this movement that do pop up in media and even sometimes mainstream media.

hangry ago

Hey, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. I've been wrong before, and expect to be so again in the future. And I would distinguish between core topics and Q. Topics, sure, we are probably on the same page with most of them. It's the Q scam that I don't buy into.

DickTick ago

God damnit hangry, I'm at work right now and can't properly read that fucking encyclopedia you just left me! Heh. Grease up your ass real gentle like for the next few hours until I can get home and send you a proper reply. Even though I haven't read it, and God knows it's probably going to piss me off, I still appreciate the reply.

hangry ago

Hey you must be home from work by now, niggerfaggot.

hangry ago

I doubt it will piss you off. That certainly isn't its intent.

MIDefender ago

Interesting to see another person identify that Q uses the Socratic Method to awaken the masses.

hangry ago

I use the socratic method. Speaking in riddles is not the socratic method. Asking questions is.