You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

followthemoney ago

Coefficients Dining Club:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficients_(dining_club)

The Webbs proposed that the club's membership reflect the entire gamut of political beliefs, and "proposed to collect politicians from each of the parties". Representing the Liberal Imperialists were Sir Edward Grey and Richard Burdon Haldane; the Tories were represented by economist William Hewins and editor of the National Review Leopold Maxse; and the British military was represented by Leo Amery, an "expert on the conditions of the army", and Carlyon Bellairs, a naval officer.[2]

The club's membership included:[3]

Leo Amery, statesman and Conservative politician

Richard Burdon Haldane, Liberal politician, lawyer, and philosopher

Halford John Mackinder, geographer and politician

Leopold Maxse, editor, National Review

Alfred Milner, statesman and colonial administrator

Henry Newbolt, author and poet

Carlyon Bellairs, naval commander and MP

James Louis Garvin, journalist and editor

William Hewins, economist

William Pember Reeves, New Zealand statesman, historian, and poet

Bertrand Russell, philosopher and mathematician

Sir Clinton Edward Dawkins, businessman and civil servant

Sir Henry Birchenough, businessman and civil servant

Sir Edward Grey, Liberal politician

H. G. Wells, novelist

Wells was recruited because he was deemed "capable of original thoughts on every subject" and proved to be "an especially active member".

Coefficients Club: Window on the High Cabal?

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/coefficientsclub1993.shtml

  1. Crime, Gangs, and Civil Disorder. Wells predicted an intractable increase in crime, gang warfare, and civil disorder until his "modern world state" became a reality. Wells came as close in this area as anywhere else in "giving away his propaganda game". On page 143 Wells states, "And then, as the greater community of the World State began to struggle clumsily and painfully out of traditional forms, we see police control again out paced by its task. It gives way. 'Why,' the student asks, 'was this police organization unable to keep pace with the new stresses'." The obvious answer would be that the Brave New World Order agenda, or movement for social change, is essentially destructive and to blame it for the accelerating degeneration of society. But no! Wells spends pages blaming the limitations of individualism, capitalism, religion, and nationalism for the breakdown and postulating world government as the "only hope" for order. It is clear that this philosophy of blaming traditional forces, that in spite of their imperfections, have been compatible with order for centuries for the increasing disorder instead of the new philosophy remains the successful propaganda line of the New World (dis)Order.

  2. War and International Disorder. Wells actually had some knowledge of the possibility of nuclear power, but made no mention of it in this book and apparently did not foresee the nuclear stalemate of 1946-1989 which gave the world some respite from the exhaustion of perpetual war which he postulated. However, with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the examples of Yugoslavia, Somalia, South Africa, India-Pakistan, etc. in front of us, it is possible that his projected "30 year war" may run from 1990 to 2016 instead of from 1940 to 1966. >Wells has a long section on Henry Ford's "Peace Ship", a public relations device by which the great industrialist tried to bring WWI to early conclusion. While giving no publicity to Ford's central contention that Wells' mentors, the "Great Pirates" or "International Bankers" were promoting WWI as part of their destructive program for "war profits" and a New World Order, Wells shows how Ford's efforts were doomed to failure not because they would be ridiculed unmercifully by the power of his mentors over the press, but because the evil forces of individualism and capitalism would force the great industrialist into war production for a profit. In fact, if Ford had not been run off the stage by the Anglophile Eastern Establishment press, he might have achieved something!

  3. The Money Question. Wells takes a firm position against the usury and tight money policies of "high finance" and for the easy money policies of "Social Credit" as promoted in Britain and the Commonwealth by C. H. Douglas, crack-pot conspiracy theory advocate (one of us!) who Wells actually goes so far as to mention by name! Of course, Wells fails to mention that his mentors, the most powerful usurers of all time who hold the world's credit in their hands and manipulated the great crash of 1929 which triggered the Great Depression, create boom and bust cycles to maintain their dominant world position.

  4. Education/Social Nucleation. One of the great mysteries of Wells' book is his apparently imaginary author, Gustave De Windt who wrote Social Nucleation, supposedly in 1942, a book that solved the final theoretical problems in creating the Modern World State. Wells states that the book, "was the first exhaustive study of the psychological laws underlying team play and esprit de corps . . ." Wells pictures De Windt's ideas having the impact of a Marx, Plato, Darwin, or Adam Smith, sweeping away the social rubbish of the past including family, religion, ethnicity, tribe, and patriotism and smoothly replacing it with New World Order socialization patterns. There can be little doubt that De Windtian ideas inform Deweyite Progressive Education and, more recently, Outcome Based Education. On a deeper level, De Windt has created a technology of "macrobe" or "social organism" building for the "Air Dictatorship. One can only wonder if Wells had a specific psychologist in mind, perhaps the German Wundt who prefigured behaviorism?

  5. The Martyrdom of Man by Winwood Reade. As we have mentioned before, ultra social Darwinist Winwood Reade was Cecil Rhodes' "Ayn Rand and Jules Verne" rolled-up into one. On page 108 Wells pays sly tribute to this mentor by mentioning Winwood Reade, though he claims in his autobiography never to have met Rhodes personally. On this page Wells also attempts a lame justification of his mentor's advocacy of worldwide carnage, disorder, and suffering on the basis of an abundance of happiness in the future Modern World State.

  6. Non-Lethal Weapons. Non-lethal "peace gas" was portrayed as the supreme weapon of the "Airmen". In fact, the miraculous gas was used to put an end to the influence of the Pope! Though the conspiracy has, of yet, done little of proven value in this area (ask David Koresh), it is interesting to note that Newsweek of February 7, 1994 ran an article titled Soon 'Phasers on Stun': A new generation of nonlethal weapons may help rout mobs, subdue gunmen, even win wars--without killing the innocent. The possible application to UN "Peace-Keeping" did not go unnoticed.

One must ask, "What will be the ultimate results of the Wellsian program for the High Cabal and for the World?"