You know BuilderAnon/ElectroLumus. He said you were mad at him. One BA sock puppet account on Reddit, is SortDoubleNegative. Type-o-negative and SortDoubleNegative qualify as a match according to your standards.
Lightlytoasted and FartyShorts was enough for you to believe that it was Fart-on-Toast. Enough for you to manipulate people into believing we were infiltrated.
The day you were making that blog post, I already had 2 TRYING to work their way in. We weren’t infiltrated, but you wanted us to be. How patriotic of you.
Both BuilderAnon and Type-o-negative talked about you. Both came from the same sub, and both did the same thing for a living. So many connections. I’m sure you’ll cook something up for your next blog post.
Lightlytoasted and FartyShorts was enough for you to believe that it was Fart-on-Toast. Enough for you to manipulate people into believing we were infiltrated.
Wow. I didn't realize Neon went after those two users. @LightlyToasted and @fartyshorts are two of the best v/pizzagate researchers. Definitely legit, for a long, long time.
In other words, I wade through rivers of excrement, dive in deep to pull out the gold nuggets, and leave the filth behind. That level of endurance, that level of discernment is really what it takes to fight an information war.
Cue the sound of Neon choking on his own cum. What a whore that guy is. I need a shower, just from reading that.
How dare that cowardly dwarf cite the Battle of Thermopylae.
Do I need to point out to you that it’s been almost a year since Q started dropping?
That fucker wasn't even a twinkle in David Brock's eye when we started researching Q leaks on Voat. What a twat.
I notice he goes after @Orangutan, as well, who is another excellent original PG researcher. WTF? That whole piece of his is nothing more than Confirmation Bias smears. He analyzes none of these users' contributions to either Reddit or Voat -- by which they should be judged. His whole argument is based solely on key words in usernames, and who is moderating what on Reddit (with zero evidence of this having any connection to activities on Voat).
How anyone could doubt this guy is a (very poor) shill is beyond me. SMH.
His whole argument is based solely on key words in usernames, and who is moderating what on Reddit (with zero evidence of this having any connection to activities on Voat)
Kind of reminds me of the low effort attempts the person trying to dox @Srayzie and @Kevdude are using.
view the rest of the comments →
NeonRevolt ago
LOL, no, I'm not, and no, you did not.
srayzie ago
You know BuilderAnon/ElectroLumus. He said you were mad at him. One BA sock puppet account on Reddit, is SortDoubleNegative. Type-o-negative and SortDoubleNegative qualify as a match according to your standards.
Lightlytoasted and FartyShorts was enough for you to believe that it was Fart-on-Toast. Enough for you to manipulate people into believing we were infiltrated.
The day you were making that blog post, I already had 2 TRYING to work their way in. We weren’t infiltrated, but you wanted us to be. How patriotic of you.
Both BuilderAnon and Type-o-negative talked about you. Both came from the same sub, and both did the same thing for a living. So many connections. I’m sure you’ll cook something up for your next blog post.
Vindicator ago
Wow. I didn't realize Neon went after those two users. @LightlyToasted and @fartyshorts are two of the best v/pizzagate researchers. Definitely legit, for a long, long time.
The plot thickens!
srayzie ago
You didn’t know?! You’ve got to read this piece of work.
All because of my ping list!
I see below that @FartyShorts didn’t even know.
Vindicator ago
Hadn't read that. Thanks for the link!
Cue the sound of Neon choking on his own cum. What a whore that guy is. I need a shower, just from reading that.
How dare that cowardly dwarf cite the Battle of Thermopylae.
That fucker wasn't even a twinkle in David Brock's eye when we started researching Q leaks on Voat. What a twat.
I notice he goes after @Orangutan, as well, who is another excellent original PG researcher. WTF? That whole piece of his is nothing more than Confirmation Bias smears. He analyzes none of these users' contributions to either Reddit or Voat -- by which they should be judged. His whole argument is based solely on key words in usernames, and who is moderating what on Reddit (with zero evidence of this having any connection to activities on Voat).
How anyone could doubt this guy is a (very poor) shill is beyond me. SMH.
Shizy ago
Kind of reminds me of the low effort attempts the person trying to dox @Srayzie and @Kevdude are using.
srayzie ago
Totally shady
srayzie ago
Lol @Crensch @Shizy