Bulls't. Tune into C-Span, Hackney being eaten alive. Wow, minority brought him forward to make him a joke. The minority and now the majority are feasting on him.
March 2009, after meeting with Swiss Foreign Minister Micheline Calmy-Rey, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton intervened with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on behalf of Switzerland's most powerful banking institution, UBS.
The IRS, which at that time was seeking the identity of wealthy Americans who had stashed some $20 billion in 52,000 tax evading UBS accounts, then agreed that the Swiss bank need only turn over information on 4,450 accounts.
Afterwards, UBS increased its previous $60,000 in donations to the Clinton Foundation ten-fold.
By the end of 2014, UBS donations to the Clinton Foundation totaled $600,000.
UBS also "paid former President Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House."
Did a bank that still ranks as "the world's biggest wealth manager" and has at its disposal a bevy of economists and law firms have a legitimate reason for paying Bill Clinton $1.5 million in speaking fees? Or was the $1.5 million and the tenfold increase in Clinton Foundation donations a reward for the former secretary of State's intervention? If the latter, that reward would have, under federal law (18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A)), amounted to an illicit bribe.
theres much more in this article, How much of Clinton money is sitting at this bank?
They have it all but can they use it legally? Some of this info may have been gathered illegally amd they have to find a way to make it legal. For me the big issue is how does MAGA go after people like Hilary without it looking like the establishment of a dictatorship? As the military is said to be involved in MAGA how do you make it not look like a coup?
Q has said 'we have it all' or similar, to me that means they have historic digital evidences, whether texts or phone or email, anything composed digitally they have copied.
But rolling up criminal organizations with many people involved always allows LE to acquire Mark One Eyeball testimony from living participants, also. Notice the Enermy has already been planting stories about fake videos and such, pointing pout technology allows digital wizards to photoshop anything today, and it may not be discernable as fake. So if Q produces video of hillary eating live Human Babies on stage at the Apollo Theater in Harlem Saturday night the media can just say, nope, Bad Orange Man photoshopped that, move on.
So, additional evidences as supplied by live participants is worth having, plus some of Q's evidences are such we may not want to drag them out into full view.
Protect means and abilities, the corruptocrats prolly have compromised us pretty good in most areas but we still apparently have an Edge in places...gotta keep that protected if we can.
And also, if obama issued pardons we need new cases/evidences too.
Yes, Trump Team have the server with special programming that was in Colorado, that kept track of phone calls, emails, text messages, and the program even sorts through who is who (who is boss, issuing orders, and who is the one ordered around). So when Q says we have it all, as usual, he wasn't kidding. Plus they have all the other relevant servers. Plus they have all of NSA's stuff.
I agree, and do consider that Q/Military must have more Tools than the corrupt civilian agencies had/developed.
People don't like the thought of it but everything 'sent' digitally must be routed, and 'whoever' has that level of access does indeed have all the data, if they want it.
Back in the 90s I recall arguing with people who insisted their comms were safe, that it was impossible to track digital encoded messaging. I would simply ask them...how does the data you sent physically get to where it's going? Someone provides a 'server' to route it where you want it to go, and in passing it is clocked, simple as that.
And so we see proven huh. My Daughter is a young college grad, her Mother let her have an I-phone when she was about 13 over my objections. Ok, about two years ago, she was 21, she realized the phone was tracking her and got rid of it. She had parked her car off campus and was walking thru Austin shopping with friends and a few hours later the phone presented her with a message telling her she was (X) miles from her car, she thought that thru and discovered her phone was tracking her every move, freaked. She told me later that she finally understood what I had been warning her about years ago...facebook/google/government all track us.
People don't wanna believe that stuff but yep.
Hey shitforbrainz can you just admit that Q has fucked you over and over and over and now has you bent over... you know mathematically Q is 100% fucking with you all coincidence lmfao
What felony ass wipe. He wasnt implicated in anything the press implicated him. Its not real you fucking moron do you not get that even if there is such a thing as campaign finance it is not even and indictible crime. Its a misdemeanor at best and goes fucking no where. Case in point Obama, Bill Clinton and many other presidents all investigated for the same thing. Did any one go to jail NOOO, was anyone removed from office NOOOO.
And 3) Even if you call this a campaign finance violation, which is disputable, Obama made a $1.8million campaign finance violation, and got fined $375k for it. But you want an impeachment and multiple felony convictions for a $130k violation from Trump? Can you say favoritism? Why the such great disparity in punishment?
good point about obama, his campaign DID fail to report on time and paid the appropriate fines for it. However, trumps illegal payments to stormy daniels are closer to the illegal hush money payments made by a different dem, i think you remember john edwards? john edwards paid his mistress to keep quiet too and did not just get a fine and a slap on the wrist.
I guess it's okay to send billions in cash on pallets to Iran per Obama, but pay off a slut not so much. Besides, this is def glass house stuff, everybody has some type of baggage, even the cleanest dirty shirt.
1) It was his own money, not the campaign.
2) If it was illegal, it was his lawyer's fault because it was the responsibility of his lawyer to advise him that it was illegal, so no responsibility on Trump.
Q is real the question is will the plan work? Given the issues involved it must be like walking in a mine field. I know patience is required but every time we feel like the counter offensive will break out, we get held up. This time Huber not testifying.
Health discussion is good, learn a lot but the shrills are a pain in the fucking ass.
I am not. It shows basic human decency. The onus is on those who accuse and have to proof beyond reasonable doubt the guilt. Keep on thinking dispassionately.
I think what really gets a lot of people, at least what gets me, is when these subs take dumbass shit like a stray painting of Santa Claus in a random elevator in TT and hold it up as another Q proof, because the author's initials are QA.
Don't get me wrong, I was on board for a while, I even left reddit after the board got axed and am still happy I did. Reddit is kryptonite when I look at it now. But I've adopted a wait-and-see mentality now instead of the fervent "IT'S HAPPENING!" sentiment that gets stirred up twice a week by some typo or seemingly unrelated occurrence. Call me a shill if you must, but I'm sure other people have had a similar experience. Voat's critical eye helped me cut through a lot of the boomer-fueled angst to see what all is wishful thinking, and a lot of it is just that.
Larp or not, there's definitely merit to much of what he says, but whether or not "IT'S HAPPENING" and he's our guy on the inside still remains to be seen.
dumbass shit like a stray painting of Santa Claus in a random elevator in TT and hold it up as another Q proof
Timeline = people spotted the Q stocking. Then Q said, paraphrased, "keep looking there's more". Then anons posted the QA on the painting. Then Q confirmed it was accurate. Now we can all consider it a Q proof, not because (as you stated) "a stray painting of Santa Clause in a random elevator in TT", but because Q told people to look for it and once it was found, Q confirmed it.
That' is you being disingenuous. An analogy would be Trump telling a bunch of kids to go hunt for Easter eggs on the lawn and then you say "some kid found a random egg".
Don't get me wrong, I was on board for a while
The official term for you is "concern troll".
But I've adopted a wait-and-see mentality now
You just declared yourself as "wrong" in the past. For who knows how long, you've followed something you now consider wrong. "Hey everyone, I was completely wrong in the past, but NOW ...". Why should someone who was so "wrong", by their own standards, be listened to?
Larp or not, there's definitely merit to much of what he says, but whether or not "IT'S HAPPENING"
See what I mean? In one little post you went from previously believing Q, to not, and then by the end you believe "much of what he says". You're a wishy-washy flip-flopper, grow some balls and pick a direction and stick with it.
Q's purpose isn't to give us truth, he outright said disinformation is necessary. His purpose is to foster pro-Trump, anti-swamp speculation and research. If you believe in Q it's supposed to be because you believe in the research you did for yourself. If you stopped believing in Q afterward, then you stop believing in your own personal research. To come here and mock people for believing in their own research, when you can't even stand up for your own, is silly. Problem is you don't even believe in yourself and your own capacity to research.
Didn't know that, but that changes nothing about me being convinced by it. Just that I've stopped paying attention. These "proofs" always end up being shakier than a stick house and I'm absolutely not convinced by the proofs that people have come up with. I'm simply not eager and hopeful enough to believe the ones I've researched, because they are never conclusive and at worst will assert flat-out lies or end up making huge assumptions.
Just because Q said it was a proof means nothing to me. If they, say, actually got a meaningful result with the Trump admin legislation or had the clintons and their ilk meaningfully prosecuted in any way after they hinted that it would happen; if it was proven that they were clearly influential in it somehow, that's something I would have to think twice about. But they haven't, and nothing that has happened so far can be obviously tied to actions of the "Q team" without wishful thinking and flatly accepting everything they say as gospel truth.
Them patting all of you on the head for coming to them with something you had clearly already attached significant meaning to and confirming it in your minds means less than nothing. Lol, wishy-washy? How about honest with myself and open to accepting I might have been wrong, and to not take everything at face value? I honestly can't believe you're shit-talking my research and critical thinking skills because I don't blindly follow and accept as truth every single post made by an anonymous source on the internet that still hasn't conclusively been linked to any real events or inside information.
I would absolutely love for Q to be clearly and undeniably true. I love the idea of them working behind the scenes to right all the wrongs and just believe everything is being taken care of and I just need to sit on my hands and watch. But that hasn't been the case so far; the whole thing just becomes increasingly frustrating. If Q ever does come out as proven not a LARP, and they really were behind the scenes knocking down doors and getting documents and sending people on scavenger hunts to find gematria code in the diction of a Trump tweet, that would be incredible! I would be the first to eat my hat and tell you it was true genius all along.
But I don't have the same faith as you, and all the research I've done gets stained further and further with doubt, following a recurring theme of the lack of a solid, convincing proof that seals the deal. It really is amazing either way, LARP or not. They get some right, but they get a lot wrong. If you're able to just dismiss every instance of fizzles and nothingburgers as yet-to-come-true predictions then what would it take to ever make you truly look at it with a critical eye?
When I wanted Q to be true, there always remained some level of suspension of disbelief for even the best of proofs. Whenever I came from the other side, and sought to disprove Q by looking for the most obvious explanations, the process seemed much more straightforward and lacking in the mental gymnastics required for the former method. I know you'll just dismiss me as a concern troll, I often did the same to others at one point. Just not anymore.
Yet you feel the need invest significant time into discrediting Q.
These "proofs" always end up being shakier than a stick house
If you look at Trump's stocking with a Q on it ... if you watch him draw a "Q" in the air unambiguously ... added with all the other proofs, and say to yourself "I don't believe that", but I'm still thankful for Trump as POTUS because Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, etc. etc. ... then your appropriate response would be to be thankful that there's a group of millions of people believe that Q is real and if they keep pushing, keep growing, the swamp will get drained or even Trump himself would be held accountable for it.
But no, you discourage patriots expecting the swamp to be held accountable. You're nothing but a concern troll.
Analogy #1 -- you're conservative, yet you see many blue collar democrats switching over to vote for Trump. Do you discourage them all because you don't want their blue collar votes? If you were serious, you would accept them with open arms because they're achieving your agenda. A concern troll would go to the blue collar democrat forum and say, "You know, conservatives aren't really going to give you what you want ..."
What drives you, motivates you, to spend hours posting against Q? What exactly are you accomplishing? Discouraging people from believing their government should be held accountable? Look at what is happening in France, when enough people believe the government should be held accountable -- it is. But you want to discourage people. Whose agenda does that serve? Democrats. So you're a concern troll, you're a democrat ... or at least you're functioning in a pattern that helps them like a useful idiot.
sending people on scavenger hunts to find gematria code in the diction of a Trump tweet
SB2 is a fraud. No gematria has been added to the Q map beyond Q = 17. That other people like SB2 elaborate extensively on it means nothing. Show me where Q said "You can't understand what I'm telling you unless you find some dude who converts all my words into numbers, only then will you understand me." Discounting gematria in an effort to discount Q is exactly what a concern troll would do.
When I wanted Q to be true
So now you don't? Obviously.
lacking in the mental gymnastics required for the former method
So one fraud (SB2) throws up a token reason to disbelieve Q and a concern troll (you) picks that up and uses it as an excuse to not believe Q. I'll be really frank, and sorry if this offends, but if you read the last 20 Q posts and can't understand them, you're a short bus rider.
Just Trust the plan, keep doing nothing.
We already accomplished our task. We increased the senate. Our job was to meme that into happening, and it did. What exactly did you think you were supposed to do? "keep doing nothing" ... what would "something" be, in your mind? Did you think you were going to do vigilante work? No. Spreading awareness was all that was required. You're running around spreading the opposite of awareness, you're trying to reduce awareness by discouraging Q followers, so you're doing the opposite of what the plan called for.
This thread is a load of shite. This business of "Trump-loyal" forces shows this person doesn't actual know how the world works and is cheerleading what would be deeply illegal. "Trump-loyal FBI" arrested people on his behalf would be illegal. And we don't have FBI forces. The fake military bullshit is just ridiculous. We have law enforcement agents.
Every single one of this points is false. It takes an actual event and adds fake spin to it.
On 21 November—Trump loyal FBI forces joining their foreign counterparts in raiding Hillary Clinton money laundering banks throughout Europe.
There was a big money laundering scandal in Europe recently. It has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. In Fact, it may have more to do with a different US politician. I'll put links in the bottom.
Danske Bank, a Danish bank had a small office in Estonia launder something like $200 million Euros. This money was coming out of Russia. Deutsche Bank was also involved, the money was then moved through them. Deutsche bank was hit with $630 million in penalties last year for laundering $10 billion dollars in Russian money. Deutsche Bank is also one of the last bank's willing to do business with Donald Trump. Trump has had six bankruptcies, the last being in 2004, but by 2005 Deutsche Bank lent him $640 million dollars to build a hotel in Chicago. Trump guaranteed $40 million of this loan personally, meaning he would have to pay from his own bank account not his company or other moneys. Well by 2008 Trump had defaulted on a $334 million payment to Deutsche. Deutsche sued for payment including the $40 million of Trump's personal money and Trump countersued. And then a very odd thing happened. While Deutsche's commercial arm considered Trump a credit risk because he owed them about $370 million dollars, Deutches' private high-net worth arm decided he was not a risk at all and loaned him the money to pay back the commericial real estate loans. Trump still owes Deutsche Bank like 9 figures. Also at this same time as Trump couldn't pay for this Chicago hotel, he was buiding a hotel in NYC with ex-Soviet money and a convicted stock fraudster, Felix Sater. Trump also seemed to all of a sudden have a ton of cash...just a few years after his bankruptcy and at the same his failure to make a payment on his Chicago hotel, he was buying a Scottish golf course with all cash, no financing. Something Trump never did in his career.
So here's what was were going around this time. Deutsche Bank was heavily in the Russian money-laundering business. Deutsche was the only bank willing to loan to Donald Trump (This is why he sought out foregin money like the ex-Soviets doing Trump Soho.) Trump did not pay Deutsche $334 million he agreed to pay and the $40 million dollar penalty. A different part of Deutsche gave Trump more money. Trump started buying properties with no financing during a global financial crisis and just 4 years off a bankruptcy.
Does this prove anything? No. Does it smell like a dead fish? I think so.
On 29 November—Trump loyal FBI forces raiding the offices of Alderman Edward Burke, a powerful Chicago politician who has held his position in Chicago politics for 50 years and knows where all the Obama-Clinton bodies are buried.
Why Burke would know anything about Clinton I have no idea. Obama, of course, has a Chicago connection, so that could tie in. But you know who Burke also has a connection to? Donald Trump. He was Burke's tax lawyer on that Chicago hotel I just mentioned. They were still working together as recently as last year. No one knows yet why Burke's office was raiding just that it was by the FBI squad that deals with local political corruption. This could be more than Chicago, but nobody knows yet.
On 29 November—Trump loyal US Department of Justice officials filing criminal charges against Hillary Clinton mega donor Abul Huda Farouki.
This sentence is straight up true. However, it leaves out what the charges are. He ran a Defense Contractor and defrauded the Pentagon on a food services contract and also illegal shipping supplies through Iran (saving a lot of transportation costs.) There's no indication that the Clinton's are involved at all with this and this investigation began years ago under Obama. Nothing about this case provides any momentum at all towards the Clintons.
On 29 November—Trump loyal FBI forces raiding the home of Dennis Nathan Cain to establish a “chain of custody” evidence stream proving Hillary Clinton was bribed in the Uranium One scheme.
No they didn't. They raided his home because he took classified information home. This is a possible crime. Chain of custody? Holy shit that is dumb. You don't need to execute a search warrant to establish chain of custody. This guy provided evidence to the DOJ IG's office. And I bet it was the IG that discovered he kept the evidence and told the FBI. There was no reason for this guy to keep the classified infomation at home that is not the procedure for whistleblowing. A chain of custody was established as soon as he gave the info the IG. There's zero need to establish chain of custody for the copies this classified information he kept at home. The US government always tries to retrieve classified info. Cain could be like Bradley Manning or Reality Winner, both a whistleblower and a criminal. Manning on Winner did not go the official whistleblower route though, they went to Wikileaks and the Intercept in their cases.
Clinton Foundation bank Mossack Fonseca Tied to Money Laundering
Mossack Fonseca is not the Clinton Foundation's bank. This is bullshit. Also it's not a bank at all. It's a law firm. You can find the names of the people the DOJ arrested here and see if there's any Clinton connection. Mossack Fonseca is also more closely tied to Russia as Putin's childhood friend used it's shell companies to control $2 billion dollars. He's a cellist and this makes him the richest musician in the world.....or maybe he was holding this money for his friend. In fact, I think the leak of the Panama Papers was a hack by a western Intelligence agency to expose Russian money laundering.
He forgot about the massive raid in Arkansas of the Clinton Library by the FBI. That was a few months ago. SEVERAL PLANE LOADS of Boxed records shipped out to the FBI.
In support, the testimony today mentioned the Little Rock docs! One of the latter witnesses (of the two from Boston) stated for the record that there is "an active criminal investigation into the Clinton Foundation by the FBI Little Rock field office". He mentioned a planeload of docs!
The shills are trying to bury the discussion by being overtly obnoxious to intentionally get downvotes, which will eventually hide comment threads below theirs.
LOL at posting Daily Crusader too. You really are a fucking idiot, bro. You realize that's a PARODY side of Daily Stormer? Like, they even say they are fake news. Wow. You are much more stupid than I thought LMFAO!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2909112 - Just a few posts down. Plain as day, even you losers figured it out. But not you, the losiest of the loser. HAHA! You look like a fool.
Huber is no different than WalkAway, Nunes Memo, Horowitiz, GPS ankle bracelets, Red October, HRC international arrest warrant issued, JFK Jr.
So when nothing happen again...today....and tomorrow...and the next, remember this post. You have no choice but to remember it. You know I'm right. And it makes you so mad that NiggerOfFaglandia is making sense.
I have no doubt they've got Hillary by the short and curlys. What I don't want to see is ONLY her and a FEW of her minions take the fall, just to make an example of her. That's my fear.
All of them must be prosecuted. All of the ratbags.
That's wonderful sweetheart. You keep saying they have her. Because they don't. And you can pout and throw tantrums and believe all this bullshit, but guess what.
You know I'm right. You just haven't come to accept it yet. You will. Eventually. Haven't you noticed how little activity there is here now?
keksupreme ago
lock this cunt up
apajeet ago
I pray to God this is really happening
gogogogostop ago
A lot of deleted comments in this thread for some reason.
joeythew ago
Enough with the daily crusader links - pop-up viruses from that site and they're NOT reliable.
Pollycracker ago
Bulls't. Tune into C-Span, Hackney being eaten alive. Wow, minority brought him forward to make him a joke. The minority and now the majority are feasting on him.
new4now ago
Remember this?
March 2009, after meeting with Swiss Foreign Minister Micheline Calmy-Rey, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton intervened with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on behalf of Switzerland's most powerful banking institution, UBS.
The IRS, which at that time was seeking the identity of wealthy Americans who had stashed some $20 billion in 52,000 tax evading UBS accounts, then agreed that the Swiss bank need only turn over information on 4,450 accounts.
Afterwards, UBS increased its previous $60,000 in donations to the Clinton Foundation ten-fold.
By the end of 2014, UBS donations to the Clinton Foundation totaled $600,000.
UBS also "paid former President Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House."
Did a bank that still ranks as "the world's biggest wealth manager" and has at its disposal a bevy of economists and law firms have a legitimate reason for paying Bill Clinton $1.5 million in speaking fees? Or was the $1.5 million and the tenfold increase in Clinton Foundation donations a reward for the former secretary of State's intervention? If the latter, that reward would have, under federal law (18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A)), amounted to an illicit bribe.
https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/presidential-campaign/272396-the-clintons-and-the-sordid-ubs-affair
Tallest_Skil ago
Call me when it happens.
FUN FACT, PAID JEWISH SHILL: IT ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN.
bebeQ ago
Maybe they are waiting for her to come back from India?
EnterTheUnKnown ago
I really hope you all are right on this. It would be one of the greatest days in history if it really, actually happens.
heroinwinsagain ago
its like the qvr group is in competition with the dumb fucks here.
bulrush ago
Wasn't Mossack Fonseca firm involved in the Panama money hiding too? The name sounds familiar.
noseyj ago
Is huber still testifying to congress?
nomorenwo ago
No https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2018/12/12/us-attorney-utah-john/
Qanonplus1 ago
Tweeted this out. Thx
JGamble ago
While I agree with most of this. What are they amassing? Q has stated they HAVE IT ALL...what else could they be getting.
The country will never be on board 100% with arresting HRC...so we are just wasting time
hildberht ago
They have it all but can they use it legally? Some of this info may have been gathered illegally amd they have to find a way to make it legal. For me the big issue is how does MAGA go after people like Hilary without it looking like the establishment of a dictatorship? As the military is said to be involved in MAGA how do you make it not look like a coup?
LurkMaster ago
Not all of the 'we have it all' data can be used in court. The investigations need to take place to be used in court.
FatLadySings ago
I doubt anything was collected illegally. Remember Q said "The Fisa goes both ways".
OsoCovfefe ago
Q has said 'we have it all' or similar, to me that means they have historic digital evidences, whether texts or phone or email, anything composed digitally they have copied.
But rolling up criminal organizations with many people involved always allows LE to acquire Mark One Eyeball testimony from living participants, also. Notice the Enermy has already been planting stories about fake videos and such, pointing pout technology allows digital wizards to photoshop anything today, and it may not be discernable as fake. So if Q produces video of hillary eating live Human Babies on stage at the Apollo Theater in Harlem Saturday night the media can just say, nope, Bad Orange Man photoshopped that, move on.
So, additional evidences as supplied by live participants is worth having, plus some of Q's evidences are such we may not want to drag them out into full view.
Protect means and abilities, the corruptocrats prolly have compromised us pretty good in most areas but we still apparently have an Edge in places...gotta keep that protected if we can. And also, if obama issued pardons we need new cases/evidences too.
WWG1WGA
GodsAngell ago
Yes, Trump Team have the server with special programming that was in Colorado, that kept track of phone calls, emails, text messages, and the program even sorts through who is who (who is boss, issuing orders, and who is the one ordered around). So when Q says we have it all, as usual, he wasn't kidding. Plus they have all the other relevant servers. Plus they have all of NSA's stuff.
OsoCovfefe ago
I agree, and do consider that Q/Military must have more Tools than the corrupt civilian agencies had/developed. People don't like the thought of it but everything 'sent' digitally must be routed, and 'whoever' has that level of access does indeed have all the data, if they want it.
Back in the 90s I recall arguing with people who insisted their comms were safe, that it was impossible to track digital encoded messaging. I would simply ask them...how does the data you sent physically get to where it's going? Someone provides a 'server' to route it where you want it to go, and in passing it is clocked, simple as that.
And so we see proven huh. My Daughter is a young college grad, her Mother let her have an I-phone when she was about 13 over my objections. Ok, about two years ago, she was 21, she realized the phone was tracking her and got rid of it. She had parked her car off campus and was walking thru Austin shopping with friends and a few hours later the phone presented her with a message telling her she was (X) miles from her car, she thought that thru and discovered her phone was tracking her every move, freaked. She told me later that she finally understood what I had been warning her about years ago...facebook/google/government all track us. People don't wanna believe that stuff but yep.
WWG1WGA
Bonscottrocks007 ago
Hey shitforbrainz can you just admit that Q has fucked you over and over and over and now has you bent over... you know mathematically Q is 100% fucking with you all coincidence lmfao
faex_cunne ago
I hope she hangs
basedmangod2015 ago
so trump was implicated in a felony literally yesterday....but sure, hillary i guess
stray502 ago
What felony ass wipe. He wasnt implicated in anything the press implicated him. Its not real you fucking moron do you not get that even if there is such a thing as campaign finance it is not even and indictible crime. Its a misdemeanor at best and goes fucking no where. Case in point Obama, Bill Clinton and many other presidents all investigated for the same thing. Did any one go to jail NOOO, was anyone removed from office NOOOO.
basedmangod2015 ago
read the court document retard, trumps" individual 1" the same "individual 1" who directed michael cohen to commit the illegal campaign contribution.
CovfefeFan ago
What was the felony?
basedmangod2015 ago
directing his lawyer to make illegal campaign contributions to stormy daniels and karen mcdougal.
221113 ago
Adding on to CovfefeFan...
And 3) Even if you call this a campaign finance violation, which is disputable, Obama made a $1.8million campaign finance violation, and got fined $375k for it. But you want an impeachment and multiple felony convictions for a $130k violation from Trump? Can you say favoritism? Why the such great disparity in punishment?
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/obama-2008-campaign-fined-375000-085784
basedmangod2015 ago
good point about obama, his campaign DID fail to report on time and paid the appropriate fines for it. However, trumps illegal payments to stormy daniels are closer to the illegal hush money payments made by a different dem, i think you remember john edwards? john edwards paid his mistress to keep quiet too and did not just get a fine and a slap on the wrist.
Winnipegger ago
What was Edwards actually found guilty of? Have a look...
basedmangod2015 ago
he was indicted and he stood trial, i look forward to trump getting the same treatment.
Winnipegger ago
show trials.... found not guilty
bopper ago
I guess it's okay to send billions in cash on pallets to Iran per Obama, but pay off a slut not so much. Besides, this is def glass house stuff, everybody has some type of baggage, even the cleanest dirty shirt.
basedmangod2015 ago
well one is a felony and the other is an attempt at a peace treaty so yeah theyre different
CovfefeFan ago
1) It was his own money, not the campaign. 2) If it was illegal, it was his lawyer's fault because it was the responsibility of his lawyer to advise him that it was illegal, so no responsibility on Trump.
magavoices ago
You shill freaks are more scared than normal. Must be over the target.
basedmangod2015 ago
yeah im terrified, ill bet you 20 dollars trump goes to jail before hillary
magavoices ago
An actual Hillary supporter? Really? OMG never thought I'd meet one in person.
I've seen people against Trump, I've even seen people pro-democrat and willing to admit it ... but Hillary? LOL
myvoicefromhell ago
How do you propose to pay me when you lose?
Tallest_Skil ago
Given that neither of them are going to jail, you don't have to worry.
Timedancer ago
Awesome post. Thank you ❤️🇺🇸
magavoices ago
Look at all the retarded Negative Nancies in this thread.
It's almost as if they completely missed Trump's Q stocking and the other 1000+ proofs. It's a mathematical impossibility that Q isn't real.
I guess libtards aren't good at math.
GritD2 ago
They couldn't do it, therefore no one could do it.
Aspi- narcissistic - arrogant - inflated self worth - democrat
hildberht ago
Q is real the question is will the plan work? Given the issues involved it must be like walking in a mine field. I know patience is required but every time we feel like the counter offensive will break out, we get held up. This time Huber not testifying.
Health discussion is good, learn a lot but the shrills are a pain in the fucking ass.
brettco12 ago
I'm surprised we gave her a better day in court than she gave so many others.
redtoe_skipper ago
I am not. It shows basic human decency. The onus is on those who accuse and have to proof beyond reasonable doubt the guilt. Keep on thinking dispassionately.
Tallest_Skil ago
Hey, fucko. How about you answer any of the questions I've asked.
TapasTree ago
I think what really gets a lot of people, at least what gets me, is when these subs take dumbass shit like a stray painting of Santa Claus in a random elevator in TT and hold it up as another Q proof, because the author's initials are QA.
Don't get me wrong, I was on board for a while, I even left reddit after the board got axed and am still happy I did. Reddit is kryptonite when I look at it now. But I've adopted a wait-and-see mentality now instead of the fervent "IT'S HAPPENING!" sentiment that gets stirred up twice a week by some typo or seemingly unrelated occurrence. Call me a shill if you must, but I'm sure other people have had a similar experience. Voat's critical eye helped me cut through a lot of the boomer-fueled angst to see what all is wishful thinking, and a lot of it is just that.
Larp or not, there's definitely merit to much of what he says, but whether or not "IT'S HAPPENING" and he's our guy on the inside still remains to be seen.
nO COinCiDenCEs THo, amirite???
magavoices ago
Timeline = people spotted the Q stocking. Then Q said, paraphrased, "keep looking there's more". Then anons posted the QA on the painting. Then Q confirmed it was accurate. Now we can all consider it a Q proof, not because (as you stated) "a stray painting of Santa Clause in a random elevator in TT", but because Q told people to look for it and once it was found, Q confirmed it.
That' is you being disingenuous. An analogy would be Trump telling a bunch of kids to go hunt for Easter eggs on the lawn and then you say "some kid found a random egg".
The official term for you is "concern troll".
You just declared yourself as "wrong" in the past. For who knows how long, you've followed something you now consider wrong. "Hey everyone, I was completely wrong in the past, but NOW ...". Why should someone who was so "wrong", by their own standards, be listened to?
See what I mean? In one little post you went from previously believing Q, to not, and then by the end you believe "much of what he says". You're a wishy-washy flip-flopper, grow some balls and pick a direction and stick with it.
Q's purpose isn't to give us truth, he outright said disinformation is necessary. His purpose is to foster pro-Trump, anti-swamp speculation and research. If you believe in Q it's supposed to be because you believe in the research you did for yourself. If you stopped believing in Q afterward, then you stop believing in your own personal research. To come here and mock people for believing in their own research, when you can't even stand up for your own, is silly. Problem is you don't even believe in yourself and your own capacity to research.
TapasTree ago
Didn't know that, but that changes nothing about me being convinced by it. Just that I've stopped paying attention. These "proofs" always end up being shakier than a stick house and I'm absolutely not convinced by the proofs that people have come up with. I'm simply not eager and hopeful enough to believe the ones I've researched, because they are never conclusive and at worst will assert flat-out lies or end up making huge assumptions.
Just because Q said it was a proof means nothing to me. If they, say, actually got a meaningful result with the Trump admin legislation or had the clintons and their ilk meaningfully prosecuted in any way after they hinted that it would happen; if it was proven that they were clearly influential in it somehow, that's something I would have to think twice about. But they haven't, and nothing that has happened so far can be obviously tied to actions of the "Q team" without wishful thinking and flatly accepting everything they say as gospel truth.
Them patting all of you on the head for coming to them with something you had clearly already attached significant meaning to and confirming it in your minds means less than nothing. Lol, wishy-washy? How about honest with myself and open to accepting I might have been wrong, and to not take everything at face value? I honestly can't believe you're shit-talking my research and critical thinking skills because I don't blindly follow and accept as truth every single post made by an anonymous source on the internet that still hasn't conclusively been linked to any real events or inside information.
I would absolutely love for Q to be clearly and undeniably true. I love the idea of them working behind the scenes to right all the wrongs and just believe everything is being taken care of and I just need to sit on my hands and watch. But that hasn't been the case so far; the whole thing just becomes increasingly frustrating. If Q ever does come out as proven not a LARP, and they really were behind the scenes knocking down doors and getting documents and sending people on scavenger hunts to find gematria code in the diction of a Trump tweet, that would be incredible! I would be the first to eat my hat and tell you it was true genius all along.
But I don't have the same faith as you, and all the research I've done gets stained further and further with doubt, following a recurring theme of the lack of a solid, convincing proof that seals the deal. It really is amazing either way, LARP or not. They get some right, but they get a lot wrong. If you're able to just dismiss every instance of fizzles and nothingburgers as yet-to-come-true predictions then what would it take to ever make you truly look at it with a critical eye?
When I wanted Q to be true, there always remained some level of suspension of disbelief for even the best of proofs. Whenever I came from the other side, and sought to disprove Q by looking for the most obvious explanations, the process seemed much more straightforward and lacking in the mental gymnastics required for the former method. I know you'll just dismiss me as a concern troll, I often did the same to others at one point. Just not anymore.
Just Trust the plan, keep doing nothing.
magavoices ago
Yet you feel the need invest significant time into discrediting Q.
If you look at Trump's stocking with a Q on it ... if you watch him draw a "Q" in the air unambiguously ... added with all the other proofs, and say to yourself "I don't believe that", but I'm still thankful for Trump as POTUS because Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, etc. etc. ... then your appropriate response would be to be thankful that there's a group of millions of people believe that Q is real and if they keep pushing, keep growing, the swamp will get drained or even Trump himself would be held accountable for it.
But no, you discourage patriots expecting the swamp to be held accountable. You're nothing but a concern troll.
Analogy #1 -- you're conservative, yet you see many blue collar democrats switching over to vote for Trump. Do you discourage them all because you don't want their blue collar votes? If you were serious, you would accept them with open arms because they're achieving your agenda. A concern troll would go to the blue collar democrat forum and say, "You know, conservatives aren't really going to give you what you want ..."
What drives you, motivates you, to spend hours posting against Q? What exactly are you accomplishing? Discouraging people from believing their government should be held accountable? Look at what is happening in France, when enough people believe the government should be held accountable -- it is. But you want to discourage people. Whose agenda does that serve? Democrats. So you're a concern troll, you're a democrat ... or at least you're functioning in a pattern that helps them like a useful idiot.
SB2 is a fraud. No gematria has been added to the Q map beyond Q = 17. That other people like SB2 elaborate extensively on it means nothing. Show me where Q said "You can't understand what I'm telling you unless you find some dude who converts all my words into numbers, only then will you understand me." Discounting gematria in an effort to discount Q is exactly what a concern troll would do.
So now you don't? Obviously.
So one fraud (SB2) throws up a token reason to disbelieve Q and a concern troll (you) picks that up and uses it as an excuse to not believe Q. I'll be really frank, and sorry if this offends, but if you read the last 20 Q posts and can't understand them, you're a short bus rider.
We already accomplished our task. We increased the senate. Our job was to meme that into happening, and it did. What exactly did you think you were supposed to do? "keep doing nothing" ... what would "something" be, in your mind? Did you think you were going to do vigilante work? No. Spreading awareness was all that was required. You're running around spreading the opposite of awareness, you're trying to reduce awareness by discouraging Q followers, so you're doing the opposite of what the plan called for.
FunControl ago
This thread is a load of shite. This business of "Trump-loyal" forces shows this person doesn't actual know how the world works and is cheerleading what would be deeply illegal. "Trump-loyal FBI" arrested people on his behalf would be illegal. And we don't have FBI forces. The fake military bullshit is just ridiculous. We have law enforcement agents.
Every single one of this points is false. It takes an actual event and adds fake spin to it.
There was a big money laundering scandal in Europe recently. It has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. In Fact, it may have more to do with a different US politician. I'll put links in the bottom.
Danske Bank, a Danish bank had a small office in Estonia launder something like $200 million Euros. This money was coming out of Russia. Deutsche Bank was also involved, the money was then moved through them. Deutsche bank was hit with $630 million in penalties last year for laundering $10 billion dollars in Russian money. Deutsche Bank is also one of the last bank's willing to do business with Donald Trump. Trump has had six bankruptcies, the last being in 2004, but by 2005 Deutsche Bank lent him $640 million dollars to build a hotel in Chicago. Trump guaranteed $40 million of this loan personally, meaning he would have to pay from his own bank account not his company or other moneys. Well by 2008 Trump had defaulted on a $334 million payment to Deutsche. Deutsche sued for payment including the $40 million of Trump's personal money and Trump countersued. And then a very odd thing happened. While Deutsche's commercial arm considered Trump a credit risk because he owed them about $370 million dollars, Deutches' private high-net worth arm decided he was not a risk at all and loaned him the money to pay back the commericial real estate loans. Trump still owes Deutsche Bank like 9 figures. Also at this same time as Trump couldn't pay for this Chicago hotel, he was buiding a hotel in NYC with ex-Soviet money and a convicted stock fraudster, Felix Sater. Trump also seemed to all of a sudden have a ton of cash...just a few years after his bankruptcy and at the same his failure to make a payment on his Chicago hotel, he was buying a Scottish golf course with all cash, no financing. Something Trump never did in his career.
So here's what was were going around this time. Deutsche Bank was heavily in the Russian money-laundering business. Deutsche was the only bank willing to loan to Donald Trump (This is why he sought out foregin money like the ex-Soviets doing Trump Soho.) Trump did not pay Deutsche $334 million he agreed to pay and the $40 million dollar penalty. A different part of Deutsche gave Trump more money. Trump started buying properties with no financing during a global financial crisis and just 4 years off a bankruptcy.
Does this prove anything? No. Does it smell like a dead fish? I think so.
Why Burke would know anything about Clinton I have no idea. Obama, of course, has a Chicago connection, so that could tie in. But you know who Burke also has a connection to? Donald Trump. He was Burke's tax lawyer on that Chicago hotel I just mentioned. They were still working together as recently as last year. No one knows yet why Burke's office was raiding just that it was by the FBI squad that deals with local political corruption. This could be more than Chicago, but nobody knows yet.
This sentence is straight up true. However, it leaves out what the charges are. He ran a Defense Contractor and defrauded the Pentagon on a food services contract and also illegal shipping supplies through Iran (saving a lot of transportation costs.) There's no indication that the Clinton's are involved at all with this and this investigation began years ago under Obama. Nothing about this case provides any momentum at all towards the Clintons.
No they didn't. They raided his home because he took classified information home. This is a possible crime. Chain of custody? Holy shit that is dumb. You don't need to execute a search warrant to establish chain of custody. This guy provided evidence to the DOJ IG's office. And I bet it was the IG that discovered he kept the evidence and told the FBI. There was no reason for this guy to keep the classified infomation at home that is not the procedure for whistleblowing. A chain of custody was established as soon as he gave the info the IG. There's zero need to establish chain of custody for the copies this classified information he kept at home. The US government always tries to retrieve classified info. Cain could be like Bradley Manning or Reality Winner, both a whistleblower and a criminal. Manning on Winner did not go the official whistleblower route though, they went to Wikileaks and the Intercept in their cases.
Mossack Fonseca is not the Clinton Foundation's bank. This is bullshit. Also it's not a bank at all. It's a law firm. You can find the names of the people the DOJ arrested here and see if there's any Clinton connection. Mossack Fonseca is also more closely tied to Russia as Putin's childhood friend used it's shell companies to control $2 billion dollars. He's a cellist and this makes him the richest musician in the world.....or maybe he was holding this money for his friend. In fact, I think the leak of the Panama Papers was a hack by a western Intelligence agency to expose Russian money laundering.
https://www.icij.org/investigations/panama-papers/what-the-panama-papers-tell-us-about-the-clients-in-the-latest-bombshell-charges/
Danske Bank Scandal https://www.reuters.com/article/us-halliwell-danske-commentary/commentary-why-the-danske-bank-money-laundering-scandal-is-a-problem-for-putin-idUSKCN1NL2HY
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-danske-bank-moneylaundering/danske-money-laundering-whistleblower-labels-uk-structures-a-disgrace-idUSKCN1NQ0LK
Deutsche Money laundering. https://money.cnn.com/2017/01/31/investing/deutsche-bank-us-fine-russia-money-laundering/index.html
https://www.newsweek.com/2017/12/29/donald-trump-russia-secret-deutsche-bank-753780.html https://amlawdaily.typepad.com/DeutscheSJ.pdf
Ed Burke https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/trump-seeks-more-tax-breaks-on-chicago-tower-with-ald-ed-burkes-help/
Pentagon Fraud https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/three-senior-executives-defense-contracting-firms-charged-scheme-defraud-us-military
magavoices ago
Calm down. Relax. The OP was directionally accurate.
Hillary is going to be held accountable because Q said no deals.
Everything beyond that is gravy, including pro-Trump anti-swamp speculation.
You can afford to be "close" when you're throwing grenades.
FunControl ago
Something will .......because Q is not a form of logic I recognize. Q said Hillary and Podesta we're about to be arrested a year ago.
magavoices ago
Nobody gives a shit what you think.
Through the magic of downvotes, you know that to be true.
GodsAngell ago
He forgot about the massive raid in Arkansas of the Clinton Library by the FBI. That was a few months ago. SEVERAL PLANE LOADS of Boxed records shipped out to the FBI.
The_Real_Wahrheit ago
In support, the testimony today mentioned the Little Rock docs! One of the latter witnesses (of the two from Boston) stated for the record that there is "an active criminal investigation into the Clinton Foundation by the FBI Little Rock field office". He mentioned a planeload of docs!
TheBRAINz ago
Nice addition...THANKS! :)
TheBRAINz ago
The shills are trying to bury the discussion by being overtly obnoxious to intentionally get downvotes, which will eventually hide comment threads below theirs.
heroinwinsagain ago
the biggest shills are ones who believe in secret fucking letters saving the republic.
you are a disservice to us all .
benjitsu ago
Faggot
Trizzle1 ago
Great dig! Thanks.
Wahwahweewah ago
Badge of honor. Over the target.
NiggerOfFaglandia ago
I did the math too. What number did you come up with and what is your margin of error.
CovfefeFan ago
68–95–99.7
70times7 ago
You guys stink like feds for some reason.
TexasInfidel ago
WILL BE A LONG,LONG TIME BEFORE GETTING TO HER LEVEL.Likely after 2020 at the nearest.
Fancy451 ago
His name was Sean Smith.
WalterMelon ago
“Trump loyal FBI“ lol wut?
NeoFuturist ago
lol holy shit more Q coping
You got trolled.
NiggerOfFaglandia ago
LOL at posting Daily Crusader too. You really are a fucking idiot, bro. You realize that's a PARODY side of Daily Stormer? Like, they even say they are fake news. Wow. You are much more stupid than I thought LMFAO!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2909112 - Just a few posts down. Plain as day, even you losers figured it out. But not you, the losiest of the loser. HAHA! You look like a fool.
srayzie ago
Lovely username lol
NiggerOfFaglandia ago
Nothing is going to happen
Huber is no different than WalkAway, Nunes Memo, Horowitiz, GPS ankle bracelets, Red October, HRC international arrest warrant issued, JFK Jr.
So when nothing happen again...today....and tomorrow...and the next, remember this post. You have no choice but to remember it. You know I'm right. And it makes you so mad that NiggerOfFaglandia is making sense.
This is not real.
This is not real.
This is not real.
This is not really happening.
derram ago
https://invidio.us/watch?v=LG09tT0d5Ys :
This has been an automated message.
FaggotOfNiglandia ago
Is this it? Did we get her yet? No? Oh, it's been pushed back to another day so it can be pushed back again?
Think Carrot & Stick
Do you expect results or are you OK with being misled constantly?
Think for yourself
Coincidences do happen
Trump IS the Swamp
Mueller is not on Team Trump and his report will outline several felonies as Individual-1.
Ask the JQ
petevoat ago
I have no doubt they've got Hillary by the short and curlys. What I don't want to see is ONLY her and a FEW of her minions take the fall, just to make an example of her. That's my fear.
All of them must be prosecuted. All of the ratbags.
Nice post by the way.
Tallest_Skil ago
Prove it, jew.
NiggerOfFaglandia ago
That's wonderful sweetheart. You keep saying they have her. Because they don't. And you can pout and throw tantrums and believe all this bullshit, but guess what.
You know I'm right. You just haven't come to accept it yet. You will. Eventually. Haven't you noticed how little activity there is here now?
petevoat ago
Just replying back to you made me lose braincells ...
NiggerOfFaglandia ago
PANTSUIT LADY BAD!
DamnLiquor ago
and ugly