You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Type-o-Negative ago

I doubt it is him, and dont understand why we all of us as a collective cant just forget about it until the end of the movie.

Think of it like this; Do you worry who the main camera person’s name the whole time the movie you want to see is playing?

Let it go.

Crensch ago

I doubt it is him, and dont understand why we all of us as a collective cant just forget about it until the end of the movie.

Why do you have a problem with people taking guesses and trying to figure it out?

Think of it like this; Do you worry who the main camera person’s name the whole time the movie you want to see is playing?

Equating this to some Jewlywood horseshit is really quite stupid, IMO. We're SUPPOSED to be digging.

Let it go.

Telling (probably) adults on the internet what to do. Classy.

Type-o-Negative ago

Digging on Q’s identity on a post that was opinion with no link.

Yeah classy srayzie....

Crensch ago

Digging on Q’s identity on a post that was opinion with no link.

The submission itself was a link.

Yeah classy...the post violated rule 3

"more in comments" might not be the way to go about that, but OP clearly didn't intend to leave the submission as just that. I don't know what SOP is there, but I assume the mods are handling it - they seem fairly active.

And that's not what I was calling you classy about. Maybe you should re-read my words and figure out what I was referring to? (Hint: it's in the nice big quote box above my line calling you "classy".)

Furthermore, Q already stated his identity, 10 people, 3 not military...

So?

Are you the Q police?

MadWorld ago

Context:

[–]Type-o-Negative -1 points (+0|-1) 4.6 hours ago (2018-10-16 06:00:03)

Digging on Q’s identity on a post that was opinion with no link.

Yeah classy...the post violated rule 3

Furthermore, Q already stated his identity, 10 people, 3 not military...

permalink(Ref: https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2788247/14493166) context full comments