Judging by your response by @srayzie, you already know it is 10 people and Q has said this much, yet you only name one person making it sound like it is singular.
Why provide disinfo to others? To fit a certain narrative for you?
, you already know it is 10 people and Q has said this much, yet you only name one person making it sound like it is singular.
So what?
Why provide disinfo to others? To fit a certain narrative for you?
Why argue with someone presenting their opinion/findings?
Research doesnt involve “guessing” It requires facts, which your post has none of which I shouldnt expect from you because you never raise the bar anyways.
A lot of facts aren't available with Q, and research does involve guessing, because you have to guess where info/confirmation can be found constantly.
The difference here is that I demonstrated to you why yours wasn't a good look. You're just too stupid to understand the difference, and think some "rubber-glue" rhetoric will work all the same because reasons.
view the rest of the comments →
Type-o-Negative ago
I doubt it is him, and dont understand why we all of us as a collective cant just forget about it until the end of the movie.
Think of it like this; Do you worry who the main camera person’s name the whole time the movie you want to see is playing?
Let it go.
WhiteRonin ago
Why?
Letting it go is like avoiding a subject because it don’t fit your particular major.
Research means looking at all angles and uncovering all rocks. Research isn’t just reading tea leaves called Q drops.
Type-o-Negative ago
Judging by your response by @srayzie, you already know it is 10 people and Q has said this much, yet you only name one person making it sound like it is singular.
Why provide disinfo to others? To fit a certain narrative for you?
Crensch ago
What?
So what?
Why argue with someone presenting their opinion/findings?
A lot of facts aren't available with Q, and research does involve guessing, because you have to guess where info/confirmation can be found constantly.
Snark isn't a good look on you.
@WhiteRonin
Type-o-Negative ago
@crensch, snark isnt working well for you either!
Crensch ago
The difference here is that I demonstrated to you why yours wasn't a good look. You're just too stupid to understand the difference, and think some "rubber-glue" rhetoric will work all the same because reasons.