Exoduslarry: People in communications generally are not subject to 'rules of construction' as though their posts are 'statutes' and therefore, that which is not included is excluded. Therefore, If I HAPPENED to cite the Protocols, in no way disparages the existence of other sources, such as 'the Trial of the Talmud or the Jewish Medical Law, the Jewish Encyclopedia, the Transfer Agreement with its 'absent landlords', or the TALMUD itself. But then, something tells me you're 'smart enough' to KNOW that, but meaningful communication is not your purpose here. It takes a certain kind of bizarre organic psychopathy to write about and work toward global domination, and all of the parasitic vampirism which goes along with it.

Mrsdave2: Yes. The beauty of the 'American experiment' was that sovereignty is inherent in the People. However, MUCH of that sovereignty we have willingly relinquished to our 'representatives'. Which is WHY IT IS IMPERATIVE that THEY HONOR their Oath of Office, and why it is EQUALLY imperative that they be removed due to FORFEITURE OF PUBLIC OFFICE if they fail or refuse to uphold their Oath. Man-made law is largely fashioned upon 'maxims' which themselves are derived from 'cause & effect' - which is why they are considered to be fundamental principles. The amazing story unfolding before our eyes, and the literal MIRACLE that we are living in RIGHT NOW is the pinnacle of universal correction set into motion by necessity. Oh - by the way - there is a lovely maxim which discusses this very thing: "Necessitas, quod cogit, defendit" which means "necessity defends that which it compels." And if we think about how that 'fundamental principle' might apply to our laws, we see it in the fact that killing in self defense is no crime. Anyway, just thought I'd mention it. I love your post - it's got a lot of spunk and fire! But, most important of all, it rings as being genuine.

You are free to think that and go YOUR way; as I am free to go MINE. In time, people shall again learn to think for themselves; to get their priorities straight; to not parrot what the other guy said; and to get the POINT. Let me give you a scenario: **You find yourself in the Minotaur's Labyrinth and you NEED to find your way out. You hear the minotaur approaching and you run out to a clearing. There are FOUR PATHS you can take, and a shabby looking dead guy is laying on the ground in the middle of that open space, wearing a color you HATE...but his finger is POINTING TO ONE OF THE FOUR PATHS. You TAKE that path - and you FREE yourself. And now I ask you: How important was it that he 'looked shabby' to YOUR way of thinking; or the color of his tattered clothing was your LEAST favorite? * There is room enough in this world for silly people...and I detect no malice in your post. Though I cannot 'apologize' for MY personal style of emphasis.

I often times use caps to point out terms of specific relevance/significance. If you choose to stand in the middle of the highway staring down the large truck headed your way, rather than OPENING UP your SCOPE of 'vision' is entirely your choice. Going forward, I hope that there is nothing that i might share which is kinda like the pointed finger of the dead guy in the minotaur's labyrinth that you MISS because your focus is on the wrong ball. Some people describe that as 'being unable to see past your own nose'. Again - your choice...you can always choose differently.

Damn right, Matey.

stop kikepologizing or you can get in the oven too

Just imagine a preacher, now when the capatilize words appear, just make that little reading voice in your head get a little louder with a bit of powerful emphasis. k? EX: I have a DREAM, when little boys and girls of ALL COLORS, can play together, etc. etc..

Did you forget your anal retention meds this morning, Moshe?

Why not? It's for emphasis!

SuzanneAnon made a brilliant post from the heart and you skillfully detracted everyone's attention from it. Good Job Moshe. The lesson here is for the rest of us to learn when the diversion is taking place and ignore it.

Are you the capitalization nazi? I read her whole post and didn’t even notice it and then I am tortured yet again by your comment which I think I’ve seen before. Just stop it.

MosheFromTelAviv: Is it not true that, given the LITANY of actual wrongdoing engeged in by the SATANIC/LUCIFERIC/SPIRIT COOKING/ADRENOCHROME DRINKING/CHILD RAPING/CANNIBALISTIC crowd that for YOU to turn your sights onto someone's use of CAPS as a priority issue over those other things says a WHOLE LOT MORE ABOUT YOU than it EVER SHALL SAY about me? You might wanna scrap that contorted mess of writings called 'Talmud' and read something that shall actually benefit your soul - if you have one...of YOUR OWN, that is.

Hey MOSHE i HEARD that you like FORESKINS... IN your MOUTH. .... niiiiiiiiGGGGGGGGER.