You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Alice89 ago

@Blacksmith21 I appreciate your analysis about NR and I share the same feelings that you described in your text. I liked his work. He has the merit of having given good guesses on a website that is a good gateway for those who are starting to follow Q. The topic about Sara Carter should raise a red flag, it ultimately discourages people from reading what she writes to read his version of what she wrote.

Countless times I've caught him subtly criticizing Q. Either by being too repetitive, or by disagreeing with his view of Nazism:

Nazi ideology was a direct response TO Marxist ideology – and the US only “won” WWII because FDR partnered us with the Marxists. There’s no real moral high ground here, no matter what pedoberg’s many WWII films (read: propaganda) would suggest.

Seems to me his always impatient with Q and a little bit angry and jealous for never having been mentioned by him. In some articles I can almost read: “PLEASE DADDY LOOK AT ME!”.

He’s obviously full of himself when he stated things like:

Honestly, I’m basically one of the only intermediate “translators” you’ve got, Q, because frankly, it takes someone with an IQ over 140+ and a ton of time, technical ability AND creative skills, to not only understand your COMPLETELY CRYPTIC AND OFTEN INDECIPHERABLE posts or

(And really, why do you think so many people even call it “The Cabal” to begin with? I popularized that name. And I’m not trying to hang on this or toot my own horn here – but just trying to highlight the communication gap we have going on here).

Don’t get me wrong. I think it's healthy to be cautious and research before believing everything blindly. But something is off about this kind of disagreement. And not only because he sells some crap stuff. For me this recent attempts against v/GA and others only showed that he’s desperate because he’s losing control.

digitalrevere ago

Seems to me his always impatient with Q and a little bit angry and jealous for never having been mentioned by him.

I've seen that kind of behavior by online personalities several times. Some personalities get super mad when someone shows up on the scene and becomes popular. The offended person feels like the other person, in this case Q, stole something that belonged to them. Something that they feel they earned a right to. There was a WoW podcaster that was sooo pissed off about Leeory Jenkins ( viral youtube video) because this podcaster had been at it for a long time and Leeory got fame quickly. This podcaster was hot about it. It's very weird and very wrong. It's a problem with the podcaster claiming something that is not his to claim and then blaming others when he is faced with loosing something that wasn't his to begin with.

Lurker1955 ago

Except that NR is rarely impatient with Q and has done battle with many Qdeniers and Qfrauds. Q has also " borrowed" items from the NR blog which I believe counts as a mention. I'm pretty sure that it's you and your anti-NR posse here who feel threatened ( because you're on the wrong team) or jealous. You all seem to have very fragile egos here.

digitalrevere ago

You can see the problem in NRs ego and super duper higher IQ. He’s a spotlight douch who is drunk on the attention. Q pointed us to another board location and NR is hurt and wants his worshippers back.

Lurker1955 ago

I am looking at other sources but having followed NR for some time I can see that your complaints of NR statements are out of context and/or not valid. One comment about "IQ" which can be interpreted as self-depreciating humor does not make one a narcissist or even an egoist. One article questioning the purpose of a few (very weird) Q drops does not make a source unreliable. "Think logically" as someone we know says .... and it's "you're" not "your".