You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

boutfiddy ago

I respectfully disagree. He definitely has intel background and has time in the trenches disseminating volumes of information and composing briefs.

He just thinks extemporaneously and writes vigorously. I do not agree with much of what he thinks, but he comes from a genuine place and is just trying to assert his voice in this very important time in history.

Blacksmith21 ago

I appreciate constructive criticism and functioning as a sounding board. This ^ is what we are supposed to do, not call each other niggerfagkikes.

Food for thought:

1) NR is a SHITTY writer. Stream of consciousness. Nothing academic. Nothing wrong with that, but don't confuse quantity over quality?

2) What makes you think he comes form a "genuine" place? Wasn't the same thought of AJ, Corsi, and others? Genuine?

3) Of course NR is trying to assert their voice. Isn't that what everyone is doing right now? Just because one is loud, doesn't mean they are right.

4) What makes you say "He definitely has intel background"?

boutfiddy ago

1) Agreed, NR is a shitty writer. He just hammers away with little structure. More regarding this on 4) below.

2) His intonation is consistent. Very raw as he is formulating his opinions as he writes. AJ is/was just a sensationalist shill. Same could be said of Limbaugh, but he did not capitalize enough on his fame. Corsi is more complex.

3) Agreed.

4) The pattern of his writing. It is staccato. The dissemination of sensitive information has to be sharp and fast, hence his disdain for Carters' work. Imagine running alongside brass or a suit, trying to convey as much as possible in short order. Keeping pace going down a hall into a boardroom or across a tarmac into a plane or chopper.

Blacksmith21 ago

There is nothing staccato about NR's writing style. It is stream of consciousness. I've done all of the above (4).

The last thing I would do is state "Some people don’t like that. They think I’m getting pissy, and complain that it’s not my job and Q knows better, and yadda yadda yadda, cue the boring, trite, dead-horse boomer-logic. Too bad. It’s my site; I do what I want. I say what I want, And I’m not a sheep."

Try using "yadda yadda" over comms while in a mission forward posture and see what happens.

Agree or disagree?

boutfiddy ago

I want to be careful about devolving into opinion tit-for-tat. No good can come of this.

I am more interested in the notion that NR may be a pied piper plant. I understand the controversy from jumping ship. And I read others' balk about how NR was less than graceful (rather clumsy) in his 9/14 post.

I agree that we should be skeptical. I just also wonder if maybe our watchful minds are working overtime. Do you know what I mean?

I do have to say thank you, because you have introduced doubt and I will absolutely be more suspicious of NR.

Blacksmith21 ago

Good response. It is possible to overthink many things. But, not when we are unraveling the "mysteries of the universe". Information overload comes to mind. Manage the signal-to-noise ratios.

Understand what "epistemology" means.

boutfiddy ago

Yes, and I am well studied in epistemology.

I maintain that NR was just caught-up in his moment of fame. I think maybe a GS11 analyst, though not currently active. He is hoping he can make a book or script deal.

I think he is more noise than signal now, which is troublesome. This is why I also disagree with much of what he conveys. I just want to tell him to STFU!

Over-reading into the signal and Q messages is a problem. It defeats the purpose.

BTW, thank you for the discourse.