Hypothesis:
Neon Revolt may be an active Pied Piper operation (https://angelof-truth.com/2018/07/06/how-intelligence-agencies-undermine-support-of-whistleblowers-and-their-publishers/), designed to build a large following, based on QAnon’s posts, which will eventually be led down the path of untruth, in order to split the movement. This tactic has been clearly exposed with Alex Jones/Infowars and Jerome Corsi (FWIW – I think Corsi is Jones’ father, based on similar type tactics and an extremely strong familial resemblance, and ages which could support this theory.]
Background:
All was A-OK with NR articles up until a couple weeks ago when the r/efugees flooded into v/GA and the newly created v/TA, which many here initially considered suspicious. Soon after the exodus, NR posts this article: https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/09/12/announcment-r-greatawakening-censored-new-community-inbound-qanon-greatawakening-reddit-censorship-neonrevolt/ which made unfounded accusations about @srayzie and @shizy being compromised mods. (Note: the article has been amended to remove reference to our fair mods)
I immediately donned my shining armor and rushed to their defense on NR's page on Gab.ai. I was told to “piss off” and then accused of spreading “disinfo”. Other comments and a lack to response to my question “what disinfo am I spreading?” went unanswered. I became greatly suspicious and started paying closer attention. One can sift through the relevant posts of NR on Gab.ai for proof, assuming it hasn’t been deleted. I’m pretty Srayzie has all of the backup.
Analysis and Observations:
• There is a likelihood that the author or NR is not American, and possibly British. During the exchanges and written into articles are UK words like “cheekily” or telling me to “piss off” – not really American vernacular, but was going to let that pass (@molochhunter). Then today’s article states: “She (Sara Carter) makes the scoops of the century read like a #^%$&$ing technical manual for a ZX Spectrum”. WTF is “ZX Spectrum” you ask? It is this, the UK version of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZX_Spectrum - The UK version of the Timex Sinclair computer. Very, very interesting.
• NR writes the following: “Oh god, another unreadable “Sara Carticle. [sic]” Here we go.” So, one of the top journalists, “endorsed” by Q, is Sara Carter who writes incredible expose pieces in conjunction with John Soloman. Yes, her articles are long, but very information dense. Is this an attempt to “sour” the readers – poison pill, sour grapes, whatever you want to call it – this looks like an attempt to peel off followers and sow more dissent among the various Q factions.
• The first paragraph of this article uses “I” or “I’m” 9 times. Feel free to count in the entire article. The way an author or presenter uses personal pronouns is very indicative of psychological perceptions. Specifically, the repeated use of “I” in writing is often associated with narcissistic personality traits. For example: https://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/terence-p-jeffrey/i-me-my-obama-uses-first-person-singular-199-times-speech-vowing
• In this recent article NR states: “I’m also not some QAnon cheerleader, endlessly trying to think up new cheer patterns in preparation for the “big game.” Frankly, I think these drops suck, and they really don’t say much at all. In fact, for the first time, they give me MORE reason to doubt Q, after last night.” That’s one heck of a change in 6 months, during a period in which Q has more than proved the reality and veracity of Q-sourced intelligence. Compare to NR’s first Q-related post on NeonRevolt.com https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/02/27/an-introduction-to-qanon/. Interesting.
• NR goes out of his way to cast doubt and lack of understanding regarding Q’s “Huber >> (IG) Horowitz >> Storch” in #2229 and how Baker, the former General Counsel of the FBI, now “retired” and cooperating with Huber/Horowitz. The details are mind numbing, but all of this relates to intelligence sharing arrangements, which are written by lawyers, approved by General Counsel and created to bridge information sharing between intelligence agencies. FBI is an intelligence agency. If I had to wager a guess, forced information sharing (NSA > FBI) was illegal and the attorney’s and IGs have to unravel it all.
• NR exclaims: “WTF does the FEMA alert have to do with Kavanaugh?!” The answer is simple, it doesn’t. The announcement of the FEMA alert was like a “bait car”. As soon as the Deep State heard of the pending Presidential Alert test, they began to scramble to figure out how to corrupt the messaging system. Just like Bait Car, the perps can’t help themselves. In this case they didn’t steal the car. They began chatter in all forms of communications. The White Hats were watching and listening and learning. “We have it all”.
Take this for what it’s worth. This is not an allegation, only an observation.
view the rest of the comments →
BlessedToTeach ago
Wow!
I think you are correct.
I just read the entire Neon Revolt post and it's not only offensive, but disinformation classic techniques. For instance, the large picture of Q with the kids in the picture was INSPIRING for me and my listeners on my nightly Q show heard my excitement. Now I read Neon Revolt mock it with "Yea, I guess we'll see". Then he moves in to telling how we should think and feel at the end. "If you’re angry that I’m reacting this way to the drops, you shouldn’t be.
Frankly, you should be asking the same questions I’m asking, and voicing your own concerns.
Anything less isn’t thinking critically.
It’s just being a different kind of sheep."
That is classic psyOp disinformation. He has moved into telling how we should think and saying we are a sheep and not critical thinking if we don't feel and think like he does.
Nice analysis and thanks for the insight.
God Bless
Lurker1955 ago
You are a full of shit hypocrite shill. You sell fucking VPNs on YouTube and harrass people if they don't call your fat wife back about her stupid home business. I'm going to start a campaign to report and down vote all of your YouTube videos. Two can play at this game You will never qualify to be a nigger faggot. You are a holier than thou cunt!
ladyliberty_Q ago
haha haters
Lurker1955 ago
Diappointed in you "Blessed to Teach" if you're the YouTuber. I disagree with you're analysis and I read the post also. Perhaps you can explain the weird Qdrops. Why the heck is Q talking about extraterrestrials, moon landings and advancing the obvious false narrative of a plane hitting the Pentagon. Don't we have enough trouble trying to enlighten the public without bringing ET into the equation? And why antagonize those who know that a commercial jet did not hit the Pentagon? It's confusing and I can understand people being annoyed. I don't understand the savage attacks against someone who was voicing his opinion on his own blog. Also he did NOT say that anyone who does not think as he does is a "sheep". I really do not understand the attacks on this guy who's brought us good info for months. The DS is laughing at us right now. I assume that since you are a self-professed Christian you will not reply to this by calling me a faggotnigger ( Apparently Voat terminology for "Hello".) not that I care.
BlessedToTeach ago
I may have been a little harsh, but here was my comment to Neon Revolt that is still in review:
NR,
I apologize if you think my analysis was unfair, but let me explain. First please see my email I left if you want to communicate at all.I have respected your posts and have driven many of my 40K subscribers to your site, but this is the 3rd time you have offended me and this last one was a MOAB to me personally.
I personally was excited about the post on Thursday. The meme of the large Q board with a teacher and children was personally emotionally motivating for me. But you literally mocked it with “Maybe. We’ll see” and went on to tell me (and everyone else) that if we were not negative about the Thursday posts like you and were not questioning Q more than ever we were “sheep” and were not using “critical thinking”. That is disinformation techniques. Telling us how we should feel and think. And no, I read and studied and decoded those same posts and did a video Thursday night and I felt great about Q and WAS using critical thinking and am NOT a sheep. If you want my support, I am ok with you criticizing Q and thinking differently than me. However, I am not ok with you calling me (and my subscribers) a sheep and telling us how to feel and to think only like you. I read your post Thursday carefully and it was negative, offensive and read like a full on hit piece. Please consider your wording when your down on Q. Others may not be at that moment and we don’t deserve being disrespected by someone we respect. And don’t get me wrong, we have great respect for your decoding capabilities, so being called a sheep and lack of critical thinkers by you hurts.
God Bless,
Rick
P.S. Great analogy about the Bible and showing the truth of the disciples and people of God vs. making them look great. I am not expecting you to always be positive on Q.
Lurker1955 ago
As I've stated I think that you've misinterpreted the post. No one was called a sheep. It was stated that to follow blindly without ever questioning anything ( in this case NR was referring to an action and not the veracity of Q or the Q team) is to behave like sheep. I agree with that. We're talking about mortals here not a deity. Are you following blindly without every wondering what the hell is going on? That's not normal. It is my opinion that you've over reacted and that your actions have increased derisiveness in the Q community. Then there's the BS about t-shirt sales. Are you kidding? I assume that some content providers do this for a living or use garment sales or Patreon donations to help pay for the expenses associated with producing content. I've watched your videos and you ask for Patreon donations so the hypocrisy is mind-numbing. I was disappointed and surprised to see you join the shark feeding frenzy on Voat. Also ( and I don't know whether this is the case) your note to NR came after you joined in the attack. Is that in fact the case?