You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Speed_Bernicia ago

Seems very similar to the aj/jc MOSSAD playbook.. Get those who read Q drops on side, build trust and a following, when Q discussion got banned on reddit, he played a massive part in making sure folks are split accross several subs and platforms and then all of a sudden "Frankly, I think these drops suck, and they really don’t say much at all. In fact, for the first time, they give me MORE reason to doubt Q, after last night." Just because he didn't see ANY value in ANY of the posts?? In my opinion Q has thought this through very carefully and knows better than any of us what info needs to be released and when. We are still very much on a need to know basis. Q every so often will cover old ground and provide more of the same types of proof. Not only to because the more examples there are, there is less of a mathematical probability they are merely coincidences, but also for newbies. There are new people being made aware of and so curious about Q EVERY DAY. "Wait, Q. I thought you had to deal with lag and such. How is it that you’re able to perfectly time your posts sometimes, and other times have to blame it on lag?" and "I’m up to my ears in [0] deltas, guys." If there are so many examles.. at one point they were going to strike it lucky with the actual time of posting and lag taken into consideration that they were going to hit the 17 second delta. Maybe thay have been trying to catch it right for a while. Now though, I'm kind of half expecting neons next article to tell us that RonaldSwansong played golf with Q, who told him that the whole operation was compromised on the night of the Q&A.

Kzintrooper2016 ago

I don't judge any drops like NR.

Drops that seem insignificant can be very significant in light of future events.