You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

pooploser ago

The record number of sealed indictments certainly indicates something interesting coming. I am still hopeful it is going to be good.

I have two questions, perhaps some has an answer: 1. Would a military court issue a sealed indictment through the standard court system? I assumed they were independent and that was the premise with this post. 2. Q has said there are less than 10 people in the know, or maybe just on the team. Regardless, if the 45,000 indictments are all related, that's impressive for such a small team.

Are_we__sure ago

Regardless, if the 45,000 indictments are all related, that's impressive for such a small team.

Have you tried working out the math on this?

An indictment means it went to a grand jury. The Constitution says that serious crimes require a grand jury indictment.

How long do you think it takes from getting information to presenting it to the grand jury and them voting a "true bill" on the info and writing up an indictment? If one person was able to do all that by themselves and complete an incredible 5 indictments a day. It would take 2.5 years for a group of 10. In reality, indictments go through many people and almost never take a single day from evidence to indictment.

The answer to this puzzle is there are not 45,000 sealed indictments. People are counting every type of sealed court document and there are many, many types of documents that get sealed as sealed indictments.

Plan1988 ago

Yes. And remember one sealed indictment can include

multiple names. And the indictment is sealed in the Federal

District where the inductee resides / lives (not where the crime was

committed.)

pooploser ago

Yes to the "standard sealed indictment" can be or is used in military court? Do you have any layman links that describe this process?

Plan1988 ago

I edited my comment. 'Yes' was to your last sentence. I don't

know the correct answer. I think it would be : no.

I apologize for my confusing reply.

pooploser ago

No problem. I reread my post and was a little pleased that no one called me out for making a statement in place of my second question. Thanks for your response, if I don't get the easy answer here, I'll do some research and post again.

Plan1988 ago

If I find out the answer, will PM you. Thank You for your kind reply:-)

Your comment got me to thinking.❕

think- ago

Maybe consider doing a post about it here?

Plan1988 ago

I am not an expert. If I could contribute more I sure would. I really liked this link/explanation written by @lawyer4justice

https://voat.co/v/2244179

srayzie ago

I’m not sure about that one. But many of those sealed indictments could be MS-13 and lower level type criminals. I think the military tribunals are for the big fish.

pooploser ago

I can follow the big fish being reserved for the military. This massive number of indictments is really my biggest point to question this movement. How it can be a handful of insiders against the deep state making these massive moves. Just filling all the paperwork would take an army of bureaucrats, I'm trying to make the practical connections and not just lean on what I know needs to be done.

The progress so far is incredible. So much that I kind of feel bad for voicing my doubts. It will be a great feeling when the history books are rewritten.

srayzie ago

I think we will look back at this and be proud to tell our grandchildren what an amazing thing we were a part of.

pooploser ago

I keep saying I have hope. That would be awesome and at the rate things are going, we will find out if we need to dig bunkers or pop champagne soon.

Side note: keep up the great work srayzie! Your work makes staying up to date easy for us that are too busy or lazy.

srayzie ago

Thank you!