You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

kestrel9 ago

Sept 22, 2016 New York Post https://archive.li/58ama NYPD investigating Weiner’s sexting relationship with teen

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/us/politics/james-comey-election.html http://archive.is/xQbaQ#selection-2851.0-2854.1 New York Times has wrong info, even as late as April 2017?

FBI 'seized' laptop in early October? From who, Granite Management? Where the devices were housed since Sept 23, 2016?

F.B.I. agents in New York seized Mr. Weiner’s laptop in early October. The investigation was just one of many in the New York office and was not treated with great urgency, officials said. Further slowing the investigation, the F.B.I. software used to catalog the computer files kept crashing.

Eventually, investigators realized that they had hundreds of thousands of emails, many of which belonged to Ms. Abedin and had been backed up to her husband’s computer.

Mr. Comey learned of the Clinton emails on the evening of Oct. 26 and gathered his team the next morning to discuss the development.

What, New York Times telling even more fake news in that April 2017 article? @Are_We_Sure time to take a deep dive into those Strozk Page emails, I'm surprised you didn't /s

https://i.imgflip.com/2aigwy.jpg

March 1, 2018 https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-03-01%20RHJ%20to%20DAG%20(Weiner%20laptop).pdf Ron Johnson Letter to Rod Rosenstein, inquiring about FBI actions involved in the discovery of communications between Hillary/Huma on Weiner laptop.

Are_we_sure ago

Yeah, I talked about all this over a year ago, when I looked into this.

When the story broke both NYPD and the US attorney opened investigations. But the US Attorney went further

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/23/nyregion/anthony-weiner-faces-new-scrutiny-after-report-about-girl-15.html Sept. 22, 2016 Federal authorities in New York have issued a subpoena for records pertaining to allegations that Anthony D. Weiner exchanged sexually explicit messages with a 15-year-old girl, a person with knowledge of the matter said. ... It was not clear which records investigators in the office of the United States attorney, Preet Bharara, would subpoena. The person was not authorized to discuss the matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

A spokesman for the New York Police Department said it was investigating Mr. Weiner but did not elaborate.

So both the NYPD and the FBI opened investigations, but only one issued a subpoena that day.

New York Times has wrong info, even as late as April 2017?

What information do you think is wrong?

FBI 'seized' laptop in early October?

Yes. The Feds executed the search and seizure on Oct 3.

From who, Granite Management? Where the devices were housed since Sept 23, 2016?

What's the warrant say? The warrant would have to say what the evidence to be seized is and where the location to be searched is.

Subject Device 3 is a laptop computer, believed to be a Dell, that was transferred from the Target Subject to the Security Firm on September 22, 2016 and is currently housed at the security firm's office.

Are_we_sure ago

Just found out ProPublica and the New Yorker collaborated on the deep dive in the Comey days at FBI.

https://www.propublica.org/article/problems-with-fbi-clinton-email-investigation-went-well-beyond-comey

They date the seizure of the laptop to the 26th, the day the warrants were issued and October 3 as the first day Comey learned Clinton emails were on the laptop. The 26th fits with the S/P texts on the 28th. So I think the 26th makes sense. It was the first day they could legally pickup the laptop.

I learned how the girl Weiner was sexting with found her way to the Daily Mail she reached out Sidney Leathers, remember her? And Leather's agent told the Daily Mail and cut a deal

“How can I at least make you some money?” she said she asked the teenager. “I basically said, ‘The only way you should do this is if they pay you.’ Certain outlets will pay you to talk, and I had made deals with a lot of them.” Leathers’ agent alerted dailymail.com, the online version of a British tabloid with which she’d previously done business. Both Leathers and the girl received a sizable fee; the teen’s father, an attorney, helped negotiate her payment. ....

The Daily Mail story raised the possibility of serious criminal charges for Weiner. If he had encouraged an underage female to take explicit photos or video of herself, he could be charged with producing child pornography, a felony that carries a minimum prison term of 15 years. FBI agents in New York immediately began investigating.

On Sept. 26, after federal prosecutors in New York obtained a search warrant, and the FBI collected Weiner’s iPhone, iPad and laptop. Agents began examining the computer — a silver, 15.6-inch 2015 Dell Inspiron 7000 — for any pictures, videos or other evidence involving Weiner’s teenage sexting partner. An agent sorting through the contents of the hard drive came across a jolting find: a State Department memo and some emails between Abedin and Hillary Clinton. The documents were not covered by the sex-crimes warrant, which meant that the FBI had no legal right to examine them.

The presidential election was five weeks away.

There's a lot of details here about who at the FBI knew what when. The overall story is that Comey screwed up big time by going public with his pronouncements because he gave himself a false choice and chose to ignore long stand Depart of Justice Guidelines. Rosenstein is particularly good on this false choice.

Once again no mention of the NYPD wahtsoever.

kestrel9 ago

I just lost my comments, will try again when I have more time.

Are_we_sure ago

That happened to me like twice when responding to you. I hate that.

I think the truepundit/erik prince story is a deliberate political hoax. Either they are lying or were lied to. They were trying to make it look like a political coverup and muddying the waters right before the election. None of the consequences came true. Clinton was not indicted. All the others were not indicted and no one from NYPD has said boo about it. I also think that disproves the wild claims about stomach churning evidence.

I have seen no evidence at all the NYPD examined the laptop at all.

The only open question I have is the DOJ thanked the NYPD SVU. Why?

Was that just a way of keeping them happy because the Feds got the conviction and the locals easily could have? Or did they do material work? One way they could have helped is talking to the girl. That's their expertise.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/anthony-weiner-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-transferring-obscene-material

Given that neither of the two lengthy dives into what happened with the laptop mention the NYPD at all, could it be NYPD SVU helped in other ways? This is the open question.

srayzie ago

@Are_we_sure

Why have you not followed thru on your assignment? Do you not get paid for answering questions? Since you make me put up with you all the time, can you at least take some time out to answer these simple questions.

@think- @bopper @Blacksmith21 @youllrememberme

youllrememberme ago

@Blacksmith21 has been trying to get him to denounce pedophilia and he wont even do that.

Blacksmith21 ago

Sorry...I misread your comment and posted in error. Yeah, @are_we_sure is a fucking punk bitch. He may be in cuffs by now anyhow.

youllrememberme ago

I missed it anyways lol

srayzie ago

He’s @KnightsOfHubris too

youllrememberme ago

I didn't miss that one lol I was talking about missing Blacksmith21's other comment.

srayzie ago

Ohh ok.