Q is promising the Fake Pope (possibly installed by 'powers' via sacrifices/blackmail on Pedo Island) will be deposed and the true Pope restored; Chair = Throne of St. Peter (GreatAwakening)

submitted ago by Vindicator

I couldn't believe it when I saw Q linking Epstein with the Pope. I hadn't really expected that plot twist. Here's my take:

The first Epstein-related post is this one in which an anon asks "P=Pope? and Q replies "[Pope] will be having a terrible May. Those who backed him will be pushed into the LIGHT > Dark to LIGHT. TRUTH."

Next, an anon posts a "liesofkikes.png" cartoon and asks "Tell us Q. How many are connected to the (((Roths)))?" Q replies "The "Chair" serves the Master. Who is the Master? P = C." He's already confirmed P = Pope and now equates P with C.

Another name of the Papacy is the "Chair of St. Peter." This refers to the literal seat the Pope sits in, as well as his authority. When a pope declares something ex cathedra that is, "from the throne of Peter," his proclamation is considered infallible (this has only occurred a few times in history), and is based on Matthew 16:15-19, which reads:

15He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16Simon Peter said in reply, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” 17Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood* has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father. 18And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. 19I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

The "Chair" serves the Master. Who is the Master?

Jesus is the Master, as he describes himself in Matthew 10:24:

24No disciple is above his teacher, no slave above his master. 25It is enough for the disciple that he become like his teacher, for the slave that he become like his master. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul, how much more those of his household!

26“Therefore do not be afraid of them. Nothing is concealed that will not be revealed, nor secret that will not be known. 27What I say to you in the darkness, speak in the light; what you hear whispered, proclaim on the housetops.

Note the darkness/light in the scripture about the Master vs. Q's first comment above about the [Pope].

The way he has phrased this, I believe QAnon is saying that Pope Francis is a Fake, is in the [kill box] and either B17 will be restored to the Throne of Peter, or a new pope will be chosen (I think the former though, because B17 was deposed under death threats after trying to clean up the pedo situation in the Church and the fuckery in the Vatican bank, I have read).

Only after all of this does Q get to Epstein. He replies directly to his own comment about the P = C who serves the Master, saying "Why is Epstein spending $29mm to bury the tunnels underneath is temple on Epstein Island? Problem. Phones were allowed in. These people are stupid." A few minutes later, he says "H" in reply to his comment -- emphasizing the missing "h" in "his" temple. This implies Hillary, whose initials he incorporates in the follow up, coded post, which includes a picture of Pedo Island, whose file name is "187.jpg". 187 is code for murders. Under the picture, he says "Where do roads lead? Each prince is associated with a cardinal direction: north, south, east, west. Sacrifice. Collect." Not sure exactly what all of the rest of it means, but he appears to be saying Epstein is collapsing the tunnels to hide evidence of where the "#chickenlovers" have been...shall we say...sacrificing "chickens" to Moloch.

An anon posts the picture of the Papal Audience Hall that looks like a serpent. Q then replies "Symbolism will be their downfall."

Going back to his first statement here, Killbox pope will be having a terrible May...Dark to LIGHT etc. I think he is saying that the powers that put Pope Francis on the throne (maybe via sacrifices or blackmail at Epstein Island) have been deposed and a Pope who holds the true authority of the Chair of Peter because he serves the Master (Jesus) will take his place.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

kestrel9 ago

I was wondering whether the 'princes' referred to people or regions (principality) considered Princes of Rome. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princes_of_the_Holy_Roman_Empire
See also the President of France. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-Princes_of_Andorra

Regarding the Pope (not relating this to Q)

the Pope who holds the true authority of the Chair of Peter and serves the Master (Jesus) will be restored.

The Bishop of Rome was honored 'first' among equals in the Church, but still equal with the other Bishops. Western Catholic papacy as most know it, has come to be all that many people associate with pre 1st Reformation Christianity (especially in the United States). But the Western See of Rome was not recognized as the infallible head of the Christian Church.

While the Eastern cities of Alexandria and Antioch produced theological works, the bishops of Rome focused on what Romans admittedly did best: administration.[5]

In the early church up until the ecumenical councils, Rome was regarded as an important centre of Christianity, especially since it was the capital of the Roman Empire. The eastern and southern Mediterranean bishops generally recognized a persuasive leadership and authority of the Bishop of Rome, because the teaching of the bishop of Rome was almost invariably correct, (however, the Bishop of Rome's opinion was by no means automatically right) and the Mediterranean Church did not regard the Bishop of Rome as any sort of infallible source, nor did they acknowledge any juridical authority of Rome.

After the sole emperor of all the Roman Empire Constantine the Great built the new imperial capital on the Bosphorous, the centre of gravity in the empire was fully recognised to have completely shifted to the eastern Mediterranean. Rome lost the senate to Byzantium and lost its status and gravitas as imperial capital.

It was not until the rise of Charlemagne and his successors that the Church of Rome arose out of obscurity on the back of the military successes of the western Mediterranean adventurers. https://orthodoxwiki.org/Great_Schism (note the reference to Charlemagne and the French President in link above.)

Consider which Christians the 'Powers that be' have focused on exterminating in Syria. What happened to the Eastern Christian population in Iraq?

In Iraq, Christians numbered about 1,500,000 in 2003, representing just over 6% of the population of 26 million (down from 1.4 million or 8.5% of 16.5 million in 1987). Since then, it has been estimated that the number of Christians in Iraq have dropped to as low as 450,000 by 2013.

Anyway, that's my 2 cents.

Vindicator ago

As I understand it (and my knowledge of escatology is not deep) the Great Schism will be mended and the Jews will recognize the Messiah at the end. Seems like we're not in much danger of that happening anytime soon!

kestrel9 ago

Regarding the Jews...You got that right! lol Regarding the mending, there has been improvement in more recent history, however for a full mending the Catholic Pope would have to give up the power he claims to be above all and the Catholic church would have to deal with the incompatible theology they made up during the hundreds of years of unchecked power they had. Like that would happen any time soon! NOT.