I've been watching some UFO films of late, out of general interest. Without getting into what I, or you, believe...would someone with some experience care to comment for me? I have questions...
In these times of excellent photo resolution, why is *everything* so blurry, never mind what is purported to be photoshopped out? Surely distance and camera resolution are not this much of a problem? Or do you state that we are being shown purposely blurred stuff?
Although there are differences between the various videos, there seems to be a fairly common 'library' of images. I presume everyone who makes a new video is cutting and pasting to suit their current statement. Are they borrowing from each other, or is there a central 'bank' of films? I'm thinking, for instance, of the large spaceship that was purported to be the focus of Apollo 20 mission, and the pictures/videos of the pilot with those oddly clumsy gimmicks pasted on her face? Likewise those pictures of alien cities on the moon, which to me look a lot like concept art from sci-fi novels of the '60s, which was my era. (I'm not poo-pooing; just saying. I have an open mind at the moment. Please enlighten me.)
There's a lot of really ham-fisted production out there. Needlessly dramatic music that all but drowns the narrator, regional accents (I suppose there's no help for that, but it doesn't make for authority), dumb sci-fi graphics at beginning and end that are better suited to toy advertising...you know, if this really is a serious discussion, I don't understand why all this infantile approach appeals to anybody.
And also with that, there is a proportion of the videos I see that are narrated by what can only be described as goofballs, people who you think must be high on something. False jocularity, dumb vocal dynamics that detract from their points, it's so damn irritating! It's not that I want everybody to have a grave, uninflected, unemotional voice. I get it that some people are quite excited by stuff they've found, like the fellow who spotted something bouncing across the moon with his home equipment, and then couldn't get an answer from NASA even months later. But I don't think the subject is improved by redneck foolishness. So why do it? Is this just internet freedom at work, and the people who care about this stuff really are goofy? Or would you like me to know that there's nothing to see, nothing to know, just move along to something that makes sense, that's right....
Sorry, bit of a rant. But I sincerely ask you, intelligent science person. What's up with this blurriness, both photographic and in communication?
view the rest of the comments →
zyxzevn ago
I have studied the UFO phenomenon for quite some time, speaking with witnesses, investigating sightings. I also investigated other stuff. Investigating it yourself is the only way you can get the truth about it.
My hypothesis is that there are many outer-dimensional beings, outside our common 3D physical world. See Jacques Vallee. It fits with almost all serious witness accounts and evidence that I have met so far.
The photographs will become blurry due to the dimensions overlapping.
They appear at certain places because these places are more open to other dimensions.
The witnesses often have more connection to other dimensions, and often have spiritual capabilities.
The best UFO evidence often show light-balls that move in a weird way and can get close to physical objects. The foo-fightser, Hessdalen and most mexican sightings are in this category.
Other sightings, including abductions have a more Oz-effect on them. That may indicate that reality is somehow broken.
There is also interesting research into abductions and cow-mutulations.
Linda Molton Howle has good information about it. She has a lot of interesting information about this. The idea that she presents is very scary: both aliens and military are actively abducting and manipulating people for different agendas. From my hypothesis, this would only be possible on certain places and under certain circumstances (and possibly with certain people).
There certainly is an involvement of the military in this matter. There are many ufo-sightings that were later followed by military actions in some way. They certainly have some information that the are not sharing. They seem to use the UFO phenomenon in many ways:
1) Continuous declarations of that they are fake, as if they are not taken seriously in whatever way.
2) Sightings are send to a central base, were they are kept secret.
3) Planting of hoaxes.
4) Planting of fake explanations (U2/Mongul anyone?).
5) Hiding of extraordinary technology (Aurora/pulse-engine).
Anyone who has seen the published documents, will have spotted the many black lines involved in these cases. There is 100% proof of that they are hiding something. Since some sightings are directly related to nukes, these sightings should be considered very important.
The disclosure project goes a lot deeper. It tries to expose many of the military operations on the UFO subject. My own opinion is that many of these people were informed with false information, so that their interesting findings would be easy to dismiss.
The first atomic bomb has been kept totally secret for a long time, by using small cells of specialized people that each know nothing about the subject. You can that a similar structure is used in the UFO phenomenon.
Besides the military there is also a very active community that is attacking everything related to UFOs and aliens. Often they stage hoaxes too.
That does not mean that there are no hoaxes. There are many youtube-channels out there that just claim every bird or rocket launch to be a UFO. Some other channels show that certain UFOs are CGI-hoaxes or caused by reflections in the sky. But they often generalize that this means that everything is a hoax.
And not everything UFO is aliens either. And, as I witnessed myself, there is far more than our society accepts.