I've been watching some UFO films of late, out of general interest. Without getting into what I, or you, believe...would someone with some experience care to comment for me? I have questions...
In these times of excellent photo resolution, why is *everything* so blurry, never mind what is purported to be photoshopped out? Surely distance and camera resolution are not this much of a problem? Or do you state that we are being shown purposely blurred stuff?
Although there are differences between the various videos, there seems to be a fairly common 'library' of images. I presume everyone who makes a new video is cutting and pasting to suit their current statement. Are they borrowing from each other, or is there a central 'bank' of films? I'm thinking, for instance, of the large spaceship that was purported to be the focus of Apollo 20 mission, and the pictures/videos of the pilot with those oddly clumsy gimmicks pasted on her face? Likewise those pictures of alien cities on the moon, which to me look a lot like concept art from sci-fi novels of the '60s, which was my era. (I'm not poo-pooing; just saying. I have an open mind at the moment. Please enlighten me.)
There's a lot of really ham-fisted production out there. Needlessly dramatic music that all but drowns the narrator, regional accents (I suppose there's no help for that, but it doesn't make for authority), dumb sci-fi graphics at beginning and end that are better suited to toy advertising...you know, if this really is a serious discussion, I don't understand why all this infantile approach appeals to anybody.
And also with that, there is a proportion of the videos I see that are narrated by what can only be described as goofballs, people who you think must be high on something. False jocularity, dumb vocal dynamics that detract from their points, it's so damn irritating! It's not that I want everybody to have a grave, uninflected, unemotional voice. I get it that some people are quite excited by stuff they've found, like the fellow who spotted something bouncing across the moon with his home equipment, and then couldn't get an answer from NASA even months later. But I don't think the subject is improved by redneck foolishness. So why do it? Is this just internet freedom at work, and the people who care about this stuff really are goofy? Or would you like me to know that there's nothing to see, nothing to know, just move along to something that makes sense, that's right....
Sorry, bit of a rant. But I sincerely ask you, intelligent science person. What's up with this blurriness, both photographic and in communication?
view the rest of the comments →
deerhoof_fan ago
Anyone who has more than a cursory exposure to the subject knows that hardcore evidence exists, and that UFOs are a 100% real, documented phenomenon.
While possibly not aliens, definitely UFOs:
ASTRONAUTS
— Colonel Gordon Cooper, Mercury / Gemini Astronaut
— Captain Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut
— Astronaut Eugene Cernan, Apollo 17 Commander
— Captain Donald Slayton, Mercury Astronaut
— Dr. Storey Musgrave, NASA Astronaut
— Astronaut Dr. Brian O'Leary
— Charles J. Camarda (Ph.D.), NASA Astronaut
NASA, CIA, ARMY, AIR FORCE ETC
— Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter, first Director of the CIA, 1947-1950
— Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Scientific consultant for Air Force Project Blue Book
— Air Chief Marshall Lord Hugh Dowding, Commanding Officer of the Royal Air Force during WWII
— J. Edgar Hoover, first Director of the FBI
— Ben Rich, former Head of the Lockheed Skunk Works
— General Nathan Twining, US Air Force, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 1955-1958
— Rear Admiral Delmar Fahrney, USNR
— General Douglas MacArthur
ROCKET SCIENTISTS / PHYSICISTS
— Dr. Hermann Oberth, the "father of modern rocketry"
— Dr. Maurice Biot, leading aerodynamicists and mathematical physicist
— Dr. Harold Puthoff, Director, Institute for advanced studies at Austin, Author of fundamentals of Quantum Electronics
SOVIET / U.S. PRESIDENTS
— Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev
— President Harry S. Truman
— President Gerald Ford
— President Jimmy Carter
— President Ronald Reagan
Anyone is welcome to provide evidence that a quote is legitimately out of context, and I will remove it.
All credit goes to /u/Alx__ (on reddit) for compiling these. Sources for these quotes can be found at http://spaceflare.net. Many of them are on video, in context. For example, this one.
It is recognized that quotes are not proof. However:
There is compelling evidence that UFOs are physical phenomena, not imaginary or hallucinatory. They are captured on radar that only detects physical objects, and perform feats not explainable by known physics. 90-95% of sightings can be explained by known phenomena, but 5-10% cannot.
Source: The COMETA Report (published by the French government):
Part 1: http://www.ufoevidence.org/newsite/files/COMETA_part1.pdf
Part 2: http://www.ufoevidence.org/newsite/files/COMETA_part2.pdf
The former Governor of Arizona, also former pilot and Air Force officer, who witnessed the Phoenix Lights firsthand, describes the experience: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2SJXMBHByZY
UFOSKEPTIC.ORG, run by professional astrophysicist Bernard Haisch, was recommended by /r/askscience Mod /u/wbeaty, who also created and maintains amasci.com, a fantastic scientific resource in its own right.
More:
Regarding physical evidence -- there is little to none, other than trace evidence like evidence of exposure to high-powered electromagnetic fields in grass where craft are said to have landed.
Radar evidence
http://www.nicap.org/whatradar.htm
http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc614.htm
UFOs defy known physics:
http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case334.htm (one case of many)
FAQ
"The government wouldn't cover it up." - The US government didn't acknowledge the existence of Area 51 until last year.
Evidence of UFOs is compelling to the extent that to deny their existence is tantamount to science denial. Earnest study of available information makes it impossible to come away with the impression that they could be fictitious or hallucinatory. While this comment is just an introduction, it includes sources that can be explored to satisfy any doubts.
MUCH MORE here: http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/wtabz/computer_hacker_gary_mckinnon_has_no_choice_but/c5gbmqz
zen_music ago
Thanks, I really appreciate these contacts.