WilhelmVonDoobiest ago

He never wanted war with the Germanic peoples and thought sparing them would eliminate the possibility of a 2 front war. Sadly, the British and Americans were working with the Jews.

worldofmadness ago

No, sorry that excuse makes no sense. He was at war with them and with war you make damn sure to take every opportunity you can get to defeat your opponent as soon as possible. If you do not, you are either a traitor or not fit to command any war effort. With Hitler decisions leading to Britain being able to fight another day against Germany, he further put Germany and its people at jeopardy and look at the consequence it led to for the German people. Hitler had the chance to remove Britain from the war, do you know how many German lives would have been saved if he did so?

After Dunkirk, Hitler should have been forcibly removed from power. I can not believe how many people overlook what he did at Dunkirk and give him a free pass on it, and Dunkirk was just one of many blunders he made.

ComradeUseless ago

How could Nazi Germany have won that war, what could they have done better or right? Withdrawing is not an option in the middle of it, as I recall they did try to stop the war in WW1 despite being at a point of advantage but some powers wanted it to continue. They really had no choice but to win.

worldofmadness ago

Read the article. Britain could have been taken out of the war very early on if Hitler had listened to his Generals. Instead Britain still remained in the war, was allowed to regain its strength after Dunkirk because of that the war on the Western Front kept going. While the Western Front was still active, Hitler decided to attack the Soviet Union, creating a two front war which put Germany in a dire situation because now the German army had to be divided into two fronts and could never be utilized in its full force against one of the combatants in order to take them out of the war. At the same time at the Eastern Front, Hitler had made many blunders eventually cost Germany the war on that front. While at the Western Front, all hopes were lost there as well because of Hitlers declaration of war against the U.S when Japan attacked Pearl Harbour.

Germany and Japan never had such an alliance where they had to declare war on any nation that they were fighting against because Japan never declared war on the Soviet Union and it was obvious they never would because they were busy fighting the Chinese. So why did Hitler doom Germany completely by declaring war on the U.S when it was not even necessary???

It's questions like this that make you wonder how sincere Hitler actually was..Even if he was sincere, do we really want to paint such an imcompentent military leader who's incompetence eventually led to Germany's destruction as a hero? an idol to follow after? I think not.

There is too much that stinks with Hitler.

Quasiman ago

World War II was staged by Jews for the purpose of White Genocide, and to partition Europe into two camps which would play scripted roles as mortal enemies. AmericanChronicle.

Adolf Hitler and all of the senior Nazis were Jews, post the slaughter of Ernst Röhm and the SA Brownshirts the non Jewish Nazis in the Night of the Long Knives Massacres of June 1934, after H was sworn in as German Chancellor Jan. 30, 1933.

Jews infiltrated German politics then perped the Holocaust in the name of the German ppl, like they infiltrated US politics perped 911 then established the bogus War on Terror, like they infiltrated Turkish politics then perpetrated the 1915 Armenian Genocide.

Hitler arbitrarily Declared War on the United States Dec. 11, 1941, following President Roosevelt's Declaration of War on Japan three days earlier in response to the False Flag Pearl Harbor attacks.

After having declared war on France and England June 10, 1940 Benito Mussolini Declared War on America on behalf of Italy on the same day as Hitler, thus between the two of them they deliberately caused Germany and Italy to be on the losing sides in WW2.

Secrets of Zion - Adolf Hitler, the Mass Murdering Jew - The word "Nazi" as in Ashkenazi refers to the "Prince of Jewry," the head of the Sanhedrin Court which meted out life & death under Talmudic Law.

Moses Hess coined the term National Socialism commonly shortened to Nazism in 1862 which he intended to be used for Jewish nationalism, thus the connection between Zionism and German Nazism existed from the beginning, and would be developed further both ideologically and politically. Link.

Documents discovered by the German historian Klaus Polkehn reveal an extensive co operation between leading Nazis and Zionist leaders, his information was published by the Israeli Professor Israel Shahak in the newspaper Zo Haderekh on September 2, 1981.

In his 1975 book "Bevor Hitler Kam" Jewish Professor of History Dietrich Bronder showed Jews financed Adolf Hitler and helped him to power, he proves most of the Nazi leaders were Jews, half Jews or were married to Jewish women .. Bronder's book is banned in Germany.

While all of this was underway Jews were similarly pulling the political strings in the Soviet Union to the tune of 100,000,000 dead in the Holodomor .. Jews were pulling the political strings in both countries and turned the Russian and German ppl against each other as an exercise in white genocide. Stalin's Jews, by Sever Plocker.

ComradeUseless ago

Its not easy for some to accept this because hitler is like some hero, being one of the very few key figures who stood up against the jews - in the narrative. Take him away and what will they be left with, not just him but the way of life they lead comes into question.

JohnConnor ago

Yes , he purposely lost the war , it was designed to destroy Germany, most likely a Rothschild clan member , he escaped to south America and everyone new it but nobody pursued after him

YouAreASlave ago

Germany was already on it's knees, numbnuts. They were fucked. Hitler gave them hope.

SumerBreeze ago

Its true, the US only helped bolshevism take over Europe

Tallest_Skil ago

The answer is no.

kingdomhearts123 ago

lol transportation faggots are here

kingdomhearts123 ago

transportation is literally sabotage if you're trying to fight a war at the same time.

there's no reason for camps unless your prisoner has actionable military intelligence you HAVE TO keep him/her alive for.

worldofmadness ago

At this point i'm pretty convinced that one of the main reasons for the existence of the camps was to keep jews safe from all the bombardments.

Tallest_Skil ago

You’d be wrong (and paid by jews to post lies), given that most of the camp deaths were due to allied bombings.

worldofmadness ago

And that was at the end of the war. You'd be a fool to think that more jewish lifes were not saved by moving them to all these camps even with the allied bombings that cut the supply lines towards the camps at the end of the war.

Tallest_Skil ago

and that was the end of the war

Congratulations on admitting that most camp deaths were due to allied bombings.

oy vey he saved the jews oy vey he was working for jews oy vey ignored all of history

It’s not working. Get a new account and try a different tactic.

worldofmadness ago

Yes and i never denied this either. I was talking about why the camps existed in the first place you retard.

Yes, your dear hero worked for the jews and he worked for them well. Your precious Hitler aided the formation of the terrorist state of Pissrael, he should be named as one of their founding fathers.

Tallest_Skil ago

why the camps existed in the first place

You know nothing about WWI. You know nothing about fifth columns. You know nothing whatsoever about the behavior of jews. Holy fucking shit.

oy vey i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again i said it again

if i keep saying it then it magically becomes true

You’re done. It’s over. You blew your account.

worldofmadness ago

Are you 10 years old?

Tallest_Skil ago

Neck yourself. You’re spamming jewish hoaxes immediately after yet another jewish narrative push in the real world. You’re not fooling anyone.

kingdomhearts123 ago

if, during the boogaloo, someone near you advocates for transportation or camps, kill them and search their things for communication devices.

Tallest_Skil ago

What the fuck is this fucking garbage. Why are even GOOD people now using jewish buzzwords for things that won’t ever happen?

kingdomhearts123 ago

lol

c'mon now. it's fun to say.

Tallest_Skil ago

Jews told you to say it and you complied. I can no longer fathom the mindset which would lead you to think it’s a good idea. No, it’s not fun to say. It’s a corruption of language and recontextualization to jewish thought processes.

kingdomhearts123 ago

"civil unrest"... hows that?

Tallest_Skil ago

Why not just use OUR terms for it rather than jews’? “Day of the rope,” which implies many people being hanged for treason. “Race war,” which implies a war between the species of humanity. “Right wing death squads,” signifying the people who will be doing the executions for treason.

You know… WORDS THAT ACTUALLY HAVE MEANING.

kingdomhearts123 ago

i don't like the process that's implied behind hanging.

if you hit someone hard enough on the head, you don't have to walk (transport) them to the gibbet to hang.

Suffice it to say, I think ANY time someone talks up transportation or camps they should be shot... civil unrest or no...

Tallest_Skil ago

I like your style.

transportation or camps

Yeah, that tends not to be useful to a cause that will actually succeed.

BushChuck ago

Yes.

worldofmadness ago

I would have to agree with that, his blunders makes otherwise no fucking sense. Specially Dunkirk.

Tallest_Skil ago

his blunders

Oh, you mean the generals who disobeyed him and lied to him about what they were doing on the eastern front while he was laid up with an illness? Those blunders of “his”, you mean?

worldofmadness ago

Nothing was ever Hitlers fault, i grow tired of you Hitler apologists, you have every excuse in the world ready to exonerate him.. He was the commander in chief, he had the final say so that is why i'm saying HIS blunders because they were HIS, he was eventually the person responsible for leading Germany to a two front war they could NEVER WIN. German Armed Forces had made an oath to follow Hitlers orders and because Germans take their oaths very seriously, many did not dare to question or disobey Hitler, so fuck off with your bullshit.

I guess Hitlers no retreat policy at Stalingrad was also somehow his Generals fault too?

Here are some quotes from the book The Other Side Of The Hill." (1948) by B. H. Liddell Hart when Liddell Hart interviewed von Kleist;

Page 112: The escape of the British Army from France has often been called "the miracle of Dunkirk". For the German armoured forces had reached the Channel coast behind the back of the British Army while this was still deep in the interior of Flanders cut off from its own bases, and from the bulk of the French Army, it seemed likely also to be cut off from the sea. Those who got away have often wondered how they managed to do so. The answer is that Hitler's intervention saved them—when nothing else could have. A sudden order from him over the telephone stopped the armoured forces just as they were in sight of Dunkirk, and held them back until the retreating British had reached the port and slipped out of their clutches.

Page 112: But although the British Army thus escaped from the trap in France, it was in no state to defend England. It had left most of its weapons behind, and the stores at home were almost empty. In the following months Britain's small and scantily-armed forces faced the magnificently equipped army that had conquered France—with only a strip of water between them. Yet the invasion never came. At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the "Battle over Britain" had saved her. That is only part of the explanation. The last part of it. The original cause, which goes deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, did nothing to spur them on, and cancelled at the first plausible excuse.

Page 139: On the 22nd, Boulogne was isolated by Guderian's advance, and next day Calais. That same day Reinhardt reached the Aire-St. Omer Canal, less than twenty miles from Dunkirk—the only escape port left to the British Expeditionary Force. The German armoured forces were much nearer to it than the bulk of the British Expeditionary Force. "At that moment," Rundstedt told me, "a sudden telephone call came from Colonel von Grieffenberg at O.K.H. [Oberkommando das Heeres; Army High Command], saying that Kleist's forces were to halt on the line of the canal. It was the Fuhrer's direct order—and contrary to General Halder's view. I questioned it in a message of protest, but received a curt telegram in reply, saying: 'The armoured divisions are to remain at medium artillery range from Dunkirk' (a distance of eight or nine miles). 'Permission is only granted for reconnaissance and protective movements'." Kleist said that when he got the order it seemed to make no sense to him. "I decided to ignore it, and to push on across the Canal. My armoured cars actually entered Hazebrouck, and cut across the British lines of retreat. I heard later that the British Commander-in-Chief, Lord Gort, had been in Hazebrouck at the time. But then came a more emphatic order that I was to withdraw behind the canal. My tanks were kept halted there for three days." Thoma, who was chief of the tank side of the General Staff, told me that he was right up forward with the leading tanks, near Bergues, where he could look into the town of Dunkirk itself. He sent back wireless messages direct to O.K.H., begging for permission to let the tanks push on. But his appeal had no effect. Referring to Hitler's attitude, he bitingly remarked: "You can never talk to a fool. Hitler spoilt the chance of victory."

Tallest_Skil ago

Nothing was ever Hitlers fault

No one said this but you. You can’t reply without a strawman. We’re done here, you fucking kike.

i grow tired of you Hitler apologists

How can you be tired of people you’ve never met?

He was the commander in chief, he had the final say

And his generals betrayed him, ignored him, and lied to him. Oops!

he was eventually the person responsible for leading Germany to a two front war they could NEVER WIN.

Nope. He was attacked by the UK and France, and then attacked by the USSR.

German Armed Forces had made an oath to follow Hitlers orders and…

…still the generals betrayed him. Oops!

so fuck off with your bullshit.

Said the subhuman faggot who literally claimed “Hitler purposely lost the war.”

B. H. Liddell Hart

Oh, the guy who came up with the Rommel myth, you mean?

Page 112: The escape of the British Army from France has often been called "the miracle of Dunkirk".

HAHAHHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH YOU’RE ACTUALLY USING THIS AS A “CITATION” FOR HITLER “PURPOSELY LOSING THE WAR” HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

worldofmadness ago

So far, all you've done is talk out of your ass, providing nothing of substance other than to use labels to discredit and trying to pawn of excuses as rebuttals while providing no examples and no sources. I'm the one who should say 'We're done here, you fucking kike', kike.

''Nope. He was attacked by the UK and France, and then attacked by the USSR''.

Yeah, we're definitely done here, what's the point of even talking about this subject with someone who does not even know the basics of WW2. Hitler attacked the Soviet first you fucking moron which lead to a two front war..

This quote is attributed to von Kleist not Liddell Hart, he was the one who documented it. Oh but i suppose that any source that shows Hitler in any bad light can not be taken seriously and has to be kike propaganda, right?

Tallest_Skil ago

oy vey you have no substance oy vey you do nothing oy vey i say so

Just fucking kill yourself already. You blew a 3 year old account to post jewish lies IMMEDIATELY after a new paid shilling push started following the Iranian general’s death. It’s extremely telling who and what you are. It’s over. Get a new account.

OY VEYYYYYYY GERMANY STARTED WWII BECAUSE MR. SHEKELSTEIN TOLD ME SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Yep, we’re done here. Commit suicide immediately, jew.

the quote is attributed to

No one cares. That’s not what is being discussed. You posted a known propagandist. Hitler did not purposely lose the war. Period.

worldofmadness ago

You think i give one shit about what you or anyone else here thinks of my opinions? I am not here to conform to any circle jerk, I am my own person with my own thoughts and i decide to share them here, i don't expect everyone to agree with me nor is that my intention either. Not everyone you disagree with is a kike shill and not everyone who views Hitler in a very critical light is a kike shill either. Get your head out of your ass. Obviously, you are not made to have a rational discussion with.

No, Jews started WW2, Hitler was just part of the act.

You didn't discuss the quote, nor did you probably even read it, so there is no reason for you to even respond. You can look for other sources on Dunkirk and see that it was Hitlers decision to halt the advancement of the tanks. This is just one account.

Tallest_Skil ago

my opinions

Thanks for admitting that you’re only posting opinion, not fact, and that everything you said is a long-confirmed jewish hoax.

not everyone you disagree with

OH LOOK AT THE LITTLE SUBHUMAN FAGGOT REPEATING THE EXACT SAME COPIED AND PASTED SPAM THAT ONLY JEWISH SHILLS EVER SAY!

Truth is not a matter of opinion, subhuman. Only jews say otherwise.

Hitler was just part of the act

They had to have someone (a white guy who hated them and did not work for them) to declare war on, after all.

you didn’t discuss the quote

I didn’t need to. You posted a hoax from a proven propagandist. It can be dismissed off-hand. I’ve read his work. I’ve read the quote. You don’t have an argument. You have no substantiation for your claim of “Hitler purposely lost the war.” You have absolutely nothing.

it was Hitler’s decision

No one questioned this. Your claim, “Hitler purposely lost the war,” is a hoax.

worldofmadness ago

You have to prove me wrong for you to call it a hoax and you so far you have not proven anything nor can you which is you resort to name-calling like a childish fucktard.

Yes, it's an opinion, i never talked of if it as an established fact. This is one way to make sense of Hitlers blunders, so far you have not even given any explanation for his blunders other than to blame it on his Generals which shows your lack of knowledge on this subject.

''You have no substantiation for your claim of “Hitler purposely lost the war.” You have absolutely nothing.''

Yes, of course i have absolutely nothing if you are just going to outright dismiss everything made to support that claim because you've automatically disagreed with the conclusion.

Tallest_Skil ago

You have to prove me wrong for you to call it a hoax

Guess what.

and you so far you have not proven anything

lol

nor can you

lol

Yes, it's an opinion

Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

i never talked of if it as an established fact.

Why should anyone give a fuck about what you say, then?

This is one way to make sense of Hitlers blunders

Another is to actually report the fact of the world, rather than making shit up.

so far you have not even given any explanation for his blunders

You made shit up and expected us to believe it.

other than to blame it on his Generals

Who disobeyed him and lied to him about proceedings.

Yes, of course i have absolutely nothing if you are just going to outright dismiss everything made to support that claim

You posted nothing to support the claim. You posted a known propagandist.

worldofmadness ago

Haha who the fuck are you to have given yourself the authority to decide what's bullshit and what's not. This is the conspiracy section, this is where discussion like this happens retard.

Tallest_Skil ago

give yourself the authority

HAHAHAHAHAHAH THE BRAINWASHED FAGGOT CAN’T DO IT. YOU LITERALLY CANNOT FUCKING DO IT. YOU CAN’T EVEN COMPREHEND THE EXISTENCE OF OBJECTIVE TRUTH ITSELF. You’re a fucking cultist. You’re clinically insane. You’re physically incapable of comprehending anything that is not jewish propaganda. Holy shit, you're beyond saving. You’re not even human anymore.

this is the conspiracy section

“WAAAAAA MOMMY CONSPIRACIES ARE FAKE BY NATURE! MR. SHEKELSTEIN TOLD ME THAT CONSPIRACIES DON’T EXIIIIIIIST! CONSPIRACIES DON’T HAVE TO HAVE ANY EVIDENCE BEHIND THEM I CAN SAY WHATEVER I WANT!”

You’re equal parts funny and sad.

this is where discussion like this happens

  1. No. Conspiracies actually exist. They are not all fantasy.
  2. The actual existence of conspiracies implies evidence for said conspiracies.
  3. Evidence is a word which refers to the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
  4. Truth is a matter of objectivity, and it exists outside of an individual’s perception of reality. 2+2=4 no matter what you say, think, or feel about it.
  5. You are physically incapable of comprehending anything other than subjectivity, as propagandized to you by jews.

Get the fuck out. You have nothing to add. I have entertained your fantasies long enough.

“The Earth is a hollow dodecahedron and we are all living on the inside of it. This dodecahedron is extruded through 5-space, which accounts for all perceptional changes in our interactions therewith that the laws of physics would otherwise prohibit.”

I have posted exactly as much evidence for this statement as you have for your claims. You claim that “because this is the conspiracy section”, that any idea, of any source, with any implication or purpose, may be “entertained” here, without question. This is your worldview. This is why you are insane.

worldofmadness ago

You have a truly sad existence, imagine getting this emotionally charged over a pathetic figure like Hitler.

This will be my last response to you because i don't have time to deal with imbeciles like you.

And i will lower my mental capacity to your level and write in caps, maybe that will help get this through your head.

HITLER MADE MANY BLUNDERS, WHAT HE DID AT DUNKIRK ALLOWING BRITAIN TO FIGHT ANOTHER DAY WHEN HE HAD THE CHANCE TO DESTROY THEM IS A FACT , ALL HIS BLUNDERS AT EASTERN FRONT WHICH EVENTUALLY LEAD TO THE DEFEAT OF GERMANY IN THAT FRONT LIKE IN STALINGRAD IS A FACT, HIM DECLARING WAR ON THE U.S WHEN HE DIDN'T NEED TO IS A FACT. ALL OF THESE THINGS COMBINES MADE IT EASIER FOR JEWS TO DESTROY GERMANY COMPLETELY. DO YOU UNDERSTAND YOU FUCKING MONKEY?

And this is why there is speculation that Hitler was an agent from the jews working to destroy Germany by giving the jews the means to destroy Germany completely with warfare, something they didn't achieve from WW1. Read the article i posted.

This is only one aspect of many other as to why Hitler legitimacy can be put to question. Controlled opposition is a thing and have always been a thing and him being controlled opposition is within the realm of possibility and the retarded comparasion you made makes no sense in this context as this is speculation and opinions surrounding Hitlers bad blunders, something we know happened. Nothing is always as it seems on the surface and there is much that goes on behind the scenes that we may never know of, do you understand that? Probably not because you have your head far up Hitlers ass.

You're behaving like a cult follower of Hitler, like an adamant religious person who will react with violence and aggression when their religion gets put to criticism. Seek help.

Tallest_Skil ago

You have a truly sad existence, imagine getting this emotionally charged over a pathetic figure like Hitler.

Yawn. Jew copies and pastes jew propaganda again.

This will be my last response to you

Yes, you were proven wrong.

HITLER MADE MANY BLUNDERS

No one questioned this, subhuman jew.

WHAT HE DID AT DUNKIRK ALLOWING BRITAIN TO FIGHT ANOTHER DAY WHEN HE HAD THE CHANCE TO DESTROY THEM IS A FACT

No one questioned this, subhuman jew.

ALL HIS BLUNDERS AT EASTERN FRONT WHICH EVENTUALLY LEAD TO THE DEFEAT OF GERMANY IN THAT FRONT LIKE IN STALINGRAD IS A FACT

His generals disobeyed him. You know nothing.

HIM DECLARING WAR ON THE U.S WHEN HE DIDN'T NEED TO IS A FACT.

It’s not, no.

ALL OF THESE THINGS COMBINES MADE IT EASIER FOR JEWS TO DESTROY GERMANY COMPLETELY.

Not really.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND YOU FUCKING MONKEY?

No, because you’ve still made up a fake conclusion and have yet to substantiate it.

And this is why there is speculation that Hitler was an agent from the jews

Nope, said “speculation” exists to defame Hitler and promote jewish narratives.

This is only one aspect of many other as to why Hitler legitimacy can be put to question.

Ooh! Ooh! Go ahead and post the proven lies that “Hitler was funded by Rothschilds” now. Go on, paid jewish shill. Do it. You know you want to.

Controlled opposition is a thing and have always been a thing

No one questioned this, subhuman jew.

and him being controlled opposition is within the realm of possibility

Not when you are literate in the English language and have read any amount of historical documents whatsoever.

and there are many examples

So actually post one. You’ve yet to do it.

Nothing is always as it seems on the surface

Which is why you’re posting surface-level jewish hoaxes.

do you understand that

More than you do, jew.

You're behaving like a cult follower of Hitler

Said the subhuman jew repeating things only jews say and which have always been demonstrably false.

like an adamant religious person who will react with violence and aggression when their religion gets put to criticism

Said the subhuman jew continuing to repeat–without evidence–things only jews say and which have always been demonstrably false.

Seek help.

Hitler did not purposely lose WWII. You’re done.

bb22 ago

And why he never brought up the Jews' habit of ritually sacrificing goyim. I've yet to see Hitler bring that up once, or any of the other Nazi high brass.

Tallest_Skil ago

Why would he have needed to? Everyone already knew it back then.

bb22 ago

Lame answer and you know it.

Tallest_Skil ago

Not really, since you have no argument or explanation for your beliefs other than “jews told me to say it” since only jews say it.

bb22 ago

You're too infamous for posting such nonsensical bullshit for me to take you seriously kid.

Tallest_Skil ago

WAAAAAAAAAA U BAD I SAY SO YOU POST BULLSHIT I SAY SO WAAAAAAA U CHILD I WIN NOW I SAY SO

Thanks for admitting that Hitler did not intentionally sabotage the war effort. You are an admitted jewish shill now.

bb22 ago

Very mature and thoughtful.

Tallest_Skil ago

no argument

no evidence

nothing to substantiate the claim

gets pissy about being mocked for acting like a jew

projects

Thanks for admitting that Hitler did not intentionally sabotage the war effort. You are an admitted jewish shill now.

bb22 ago

The big bold letters and fake quote have finally convinced me.

Tallest_Skil ago

I don’t give a fuck. You’re an admitted shill. You’re paid to post lies. You will never be “convinced” until there’s a bullet in your head. I exposed you as shilling the jewish party line.

bb22 ago

You're trying so hard.

Tallest_Skil ago

The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you. Hitler did not intentionally sabotage the war effort.

bb22 ago

You trying to convince me, or you?

Tallest_Skil ago

Thanks for admitting Hitler did not intentionally lose the war.

bb22 ago

That's funny.

AnotherNewAlt ago

No

bb22 ago

If Hitler really hated the Jews so much how come he never brought up their most infamous crimes of all time: ritual sacrifice, especially of children? Even the Bible is filled with these references. Why didn't Hitler bring it up?

AnotherNewAlt ago

Because not every idiot who comes up with an arbitrary rule for someone to be credible for an arbitrary thing is correct.

You're like these autists who think the yellow vests ought to do the things they say they should do or their efforts are invalid. That's obviously retarded for reasons I don't even know where to begin explaining.

bb22 ago

Are you unaware of the prevalence of Jews being accused of ritual murder of children throughout history or what? You know there are Catholic saints, martyrs, who were murdered in exactly such a way, and are so remembered. And it's all throughout the Old Testament. So again I ask: Can you show me a single time Hitler referred to this?

Since you like analogies, let me give you my own analogy, retard. Jews are like cancer, and the worst behavior they are known for committing is literally murdering children. Attacking Jews for usury, or economic or political issues, but avoiding even mentioning the worst shit they do, is like something controlled opposition would do. In fact, that's not even an analogy, that's what the fuck happened.'

And Hitler also made a transfer agreement with Zionists that began relocating Jews to what is now Israel. What do you think the odds are that you didn't know about that, either?

Looking forward to your next pseudo-intellectual ramblings.