Why didn't he present that at his trial? I mean, there were people spotted in an area where trees grow! Someone connected to the school had workers move supplies and equipment into the halls while they worked on the classrooms! What more proofs do people need?
His book shows the evidence that the school wasnt even open. All school require to keep all memeos from staff. He requested a FOIA of any and all memos, he was told there is none. So either the school operated illegally, or wasnt open.
So ask yourself, what is the probability that these five claims (if we also include the missing names, ages and sex from the final report) would be true if Sandy Hook had been a real event?
Not zero. It's interesting to see how cognition varies among different groups of people, but I've seen no convincing evidence that it was faked. It's all conjecture, and inference. The question I ask myself is why are the "no SH deaths" people unable to come up with any solid evidence? It's all stuff like the cars being parked "the wrong way". I've seen a number of anomalous situations and circumstances in my time, so I remain skeptical.
I didn't watch any of the Sandy Hook coverage at the time, and have little interest in the actual shooting. It's the "everything is fake" people that I find fascinating. (no man in space, no space!, no nukes, no sphere earth, and etc.) Sometimes. Trying to tease something real out of them can get tedious, though. Mainly, I suspect it's people who've had no formal training in logic, and/or how to form accurate conclusions.
I personally have no definite opinion on whether the shooting happened as advertised. I tend to think faking it would create too much ACTUAL evidence that would rapidly be exposed, but all I see is internet hype. On the other hand, flooding the internet with fake theorists spouting wacky claims might be an effective coverup...
Maybe have a look at some documentaries before passing judgement. A lot have been made, containing lots of evidence. There's pictures from the day before (where they were practicing the 'shooting'), there's video of people walking around in circles, there's crisis actor comparisons, there's photos of children that don't exist, not to mention that the school was closed at the time (lots of evidence of that, including no internet connection for years, mold on walls and floors, broken pavements)... have a look into it. It didn't happen.
Is there one that cuts right to the chase, and follows many of the conventions of logic? Last time, someone linked a 3.75 hour video... I'm thinking one could lay out their entire case in 5 - 10 minutes, just going down their list with a brief explanation and justification for each point.
I'm not sure tbh, that long one is the best... goes into a lot of detail about every aspect of the hoax. Trying to search for info is futile, it's hidden so deep it's frustrating.
view the rest of the comments →
pixelkitteh ago
Unbelievable. And still not even a lick of proof handy sook ever happened. Lots of evidence that says it didn't though...
Tsilent_Tsunami ago
Why didn't he present that at his trial? I mean, there were people spotted in an area where trees grow! Someone connected to the school had workers move supplies and equipment into the halls while they worked on the classrooms! What more proofs do people need?
Rellik88 ago
His book shows the evidence that the school wasnt even open. All school require to keep all memeos from staff. He requested a FOIA of any and all memos, he was told there is none. So either the school operated illegally, or wasnt open.
Look for yourself http://www.chemtrailplanet.com/PDF/NobodyDiedAtSandyHook.pdf
Tsilent_Tsunami ago
Not zero. It's interesting to see how cognition varies among different groups of people, but I've seen no convincing evidence that it was faked. It's all conjecture, and inference. The question I ask myself is why are the "no SH deaths" people unable to come up with any solid evidence? It's all stuff like the cars being parked "the wrong way". I've seen a number of anomalous situations and circumstances in my time, so I remain skeptical.
I didn't watch any of the Sandy Hook coverage at the time, and have little interest in the actual shooting. It's the "everything is fake" people that I find fascinating. (no man in space, no space!, no nukes, no sphere earth, and etc.) Sometimes. Trying to tease something real out of them can get tedious, though. Mainly, I suspect it's people who've had no formal training in logic, and/or how to form accurate conclusions.
I personally have no definite opinion on whether the shooting happened as advertised. I tend to think faking it would create too much ACTUAL evidence that would rapidly be exposed, but all I see is internet hype. On the other hand, flooding the internet with fake theorists spouting wacky claims might be an effective coverup...
pixelkitteh ago
Maybe have a look at some documentaries before passing judgement. A lot have been made, containing lots of evidence. There's pictures from the day before (where they were practicing the 'shooting'), there's video of people walking around in circles, there's crisis actor comparisons, there's photos of children that don't exist, not to mention that the school was closed at the time (lots of evidence of that, including no internet connection for years, mold on walls and floors, broken pavements)... have a look into it. It didn't happen.
Tsilent_Tsunami ago
Is there one that cuts right to the chase, and follows many of the conventions of logic? Last time, someone linked a 3.75 hour video... I'm thinking one could lay out their entire case in 5 - 10 minutes, just going down their list with a brief explanation and justification for each point.
pixelkitteh ago
I'm not sure tbh, that long one is the best... goes into a lot of detail about every aspect of the hoax. Trying to search for info is futile, it's hidden so deep it's frustrating.