Defamation, liable, and slander are not covered. In this particular case the judge either had to rule as he did or rule that at least one death certificate issued for a victim was forged. No way he was ruling the latter so he ruled the former. This is to ensure anyone who questions the narrative at all is shut down quickly.
view the rest of the comments →
NSADid911 ago
What happened to freedom of speech?
SquarebobSpongebutt ago
Defamation, liable, and slander are not covered. In this particular case the judge either had to rule as he did or rule that at least one death certificate issued for a victim was forged. No way he was ruling the latter so he ruled the former. This is to ensure anyone who questions the narrative at all is shut down quickly.
Sheetz ago
So the parents don’t want to lose the fame of losing their potentially fake children?
YoHomie ago
No, they just want to cash-in on exploiting their kid.
grandmacaesar ago
This was posted yesterday. I haven't checked into it, but with the rest of the oddities around SH, it seems plausible.
https://voat.co/v/news/3473980/20971013