1, 2 and 7 all turned to dust in mid air. They didn't collapse from internal demolitions, or thermite or "mini nukes". Or there would have been a HUGE pile of wreckage at least 10 stories high, spread out. There wasn't. Lamont didn't even register any seismic activity of the building coming down. Which is creepy. This was done with a FAR different technology than " demolitions" which is absurd.
So this is why you all have been screeching "ISRAEL!" "ISRAEL!" "ISRAEL!" and down-voting me every time I've said: "....and the CIA"? @Israel-Did-9-11 shill
What did WTC Building 7 have in it? What did the two main towers have in them? I remember reading something that documents proving massive corruption within the US government with major businesses was held in them, but it's been so long, now...
One or two of the floors right were one of the planes hit were occupied by Kroll & Associates. But they were fortunate to have cleared out their entire offices just days before the event, leaving only their computer servers full of evidence of their criminal activities. Recently, the son of the owner produced some super jewey netflix cartoon in which he denigrates 9/11 truth.
As for building 7, aka the (((Solomon))) Brothers building, I think it held offices of intelligence agencies. I know Giuliani's emergency base of operations was in there, which his team did not use that day.
Sorry if that's not all accurate. I'm going by memory too.
I don't know. I've seen the video of the wing appearing to go behind the building and I agree that the other videos of the impact on tower 2 don't look entirely convincing either. But at this point, I think whether or not they were hit by planes is not super important. Have you ever seen any footage of the initial explosions which do not show planes at all? I think it would be a difficult task to hunt down every single recording, silence the person who shot the it, and edit in the planes. What would be much easier is to edit that one clip to make it appear that the wing traveled behind the building to make 911 truthers argue over this detail and not focus on retaliation against the jews who orchestrated the attack.
Then there is this one. Notice they switch between resolutions on the videos. The clearer video shows an explosion with no plane. Most people do not catch it. You can tell everything is fake when you see the clear footage comparatively.
I always thought it was clear that no plane hit the pentagon or went down in Shanksville, but just assumed that planes had actually hit the towers just because that would have been more difficult to cover up. Of course it was not planes that brought the towers down, but I figured they just used the planes as a cover for the demolition. I still think we need to focus on retribution first and then figure out the "how" afterwards.
The NTSB report proved it wasnt fire. The model they used is not the same as the video of the collapse. The building in the model crumpled in on itself and didn't collapse at free fall. They basically gave a model of how a fire could theoretically collapse a building like WTC7 but that model does not reflect the video evidence of how the building fell. Its complete bullshit just like the Pentagon attack.
Oh come on. Planes accidents happen all the time without debris fields. At precise angles. And just happen to hit the part of the building which is about to be audited after showing a huge loss of money.
Anarchy99 ago
1, 2 and 7 all turned to dust in mid air. They didn't collapse from internal demolitions, or thermite or "mini nukes". Or there would have been a HUGE pile of wreckage at least 10 stories high, spread out. There wasn't. Lamont didn't even register any seismic activity of the building coming down. Which is creepy. This was done with a FAR different technology than " demolitions" which is absurd.
somethingsgottagive ago
where is the report?
FcukMerkel ago
Where were all the Enron files, do you remember Enron? Building 7
IIJOSEPHXII ago
Is nobody ever going to explain how 2mm of fuselage and wing aluminium can slice through 54 inches of toughened steel like it was made of paper?
Anarchy99 ago
it can't it was fake plane footage its so obvious. Americans are stooopid
gosso920 ago
Eighteen years later, they determined gravity was to blame.
celestial-skylord ago
Just because they lie doesn't mean anyone believed them.
IIJOSEPHXII ago
"It takes two to lie - one to lie and one to listen." Homer Simpson.
Clubbooradley ago
Unfortunately, plenty of people believed them.
A very simple “woke” test:
Was 9/11 an inside job?
Many who believe that it was an inside job still won’t say it out loud.
fluhthreeex ago
So this is why you all have been screeching "ISRAEL!" "ISRAEL!" "ISRAEL!" and down-voting me every time I've said: "....and the CIA"? @Israel-Did-9-11 shill
https://voat.co/v/news/3404427/20377176?context=10 - https://archive.fo/UfCOY
https://voat.co/v/news/3395840/20300838?context=10 - https://archive.is/CdEyP
WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago
Why dicktease that news is coming? Just share the news
DABBING_AT_AUSCHWITZ ago
Read Solving 9-11, it definitively shows that Israel committed 9-11.
speedisavirus ago
No it isn't
xExekut3x ago
What did WTC Building 7 have in it? What did the two main towers have in them? I remember reading something that documents proving massive corruption within the US government with major businesses was held in them, but it's been so long, now...
EngelbertHumperdinck ago
One or two of the floors right were one of the planes hit were occupied by Kroll & Associates. But they were fortunate to have cleared out their entire offices just days before the event, leaving only their computer servers full of evidence of their criminal activities. Recently, the son of the owner produced some super jewey netflix cartoon in which he denigrates 9/11 truth.
As for building 7, aka the (((Solomon))) Brothers building, I think it held offices of intelligence agencies. I know Giuliani's emergency base of operations was in there, which his team did not use that day.
Sorry if that's not all accurate. I'm going by memory too.
psioniq ago
I seem to recall that everything concerning the Enron case, was stored in building 7 too.
Anarchy99 ago
There were no planes
EngelbertHumperdinck ago
I don't know. I've seen the video of the wing appearing to go behind the building and I agree that the other videos of the impact on tower 2 don't look entirely convincing either. But at this point, I think whether or not they were hit by planes is not super important. Have you ever seen any footage of the initial explosions which do not show planes at all? I think it would be a difficult task to hunt down every single recording, silence the person who shot the it, and edit in the planes. What would be much easier is to edit that one clip to make it appear that the wing traveled behind the building to make 911 truthers argue over this detail and not focus on retaliation against the jews who orchestrated the attack.
Anarchy99 ago
where is the plane ?
https://youtu.be/vDrbhFxKK-Y
EngelbertHumperdinck ago
Ah, I see. Thanks. I don't remember seeing that one before.
Anarchy99 ago
Then there is this one. Notice they switch between resolutions on the videos. The clearer video shows an explosion with no plane. Most people do not catch it. You can tell everything is fake when you see the clear footage comparatively.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=5Tl__04Xoi0&list=PL94307CC5E95EDF7B
Anarchy99 ago
many hours studying the fake footage
Anarchy99 ago
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VXE_sikjlJ0&feature=youtu.be
Anarchy99 ago
no plane wreckage, anywhere
EngelbertHumperdinck ago
I always thought it was clear that no plane hit the pentagon or went down in Shanksville, but just assumed that planes had actually hit the towers just because that would have been more difficult to cover up. Of course it was not planes that brought the towers down, but I figured they just used the planes as a cover for the demolition. I still think we need to focus on retribution first and then figure out the "how" afterwards.
ArcAngel ago
the only way fire woildve brought down any of these buildings, were if 6 gorrilion jews suddenly spontaniously combust in the buildings..
EngelbertHumperdinck ago
They do burn extra hot.
#BurningKikesMeltSteelBeams
ArcAngel ago
i heard, back at aushwitz, the previously creamated jews fueled the next batch.. thats how they were able to cook 6gorrilion kikes in 3 years! oy vey!
doubleanalbypass ago
oh the media will be all over..
..something else.
undertheshills ago
The NTSB report proved it wasnt fire. The model they used is not the same as the video of the collapse. The building in the model crumpled in on itself and didn't collapse at free fall. They basically gave a model of how a fire could theoretically collapse a building like WTC7 but that model does not reflect the video evidence of how the building fell. Its complete bullshit just like the Pentagon attack.
LexOrandiLexCredendi ago
Oh come on. Planes accidents happen all the time without debris fields. At precise angles. And just happen to hit the part of the building which is about to be audited after showing a huge loss of money.
You and your wacky "conspiracy theories".
Darksideofthemoon87 ago
Only after those sections have been been recently "reinforced"
meowski ago
idk why we need to use photoshopped images on this